Computerized Versus Traditional Approaches for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Analysis of Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index

被引:0
作者
Namireddy, Srikar R. [1 ]
Gill, Saran S. [1 ]
Yaqub, Yousuf [1 ]
Ramkumar, Pratik [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Fac Med, London, England
关键词
Computerized TKA; KSS; Traditional TKA; WOMAC; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/os.14103
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgery for osteoarthritis, with increasing prevalence expected in the near future. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of computerized TKA versus traditional TKA, focusing on postoperative outcomes measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and the Knee Society score (KSS). A search on PubMed and Cochrane databases on November 14, 2023 for retrospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) yielded data on WOMAC and KSS. The search strategy was predefined, and methodological quality of studies was critically appraised. Two researchers extracted data. Unpaired t-testing assessed the mean monthly changes in KSS and WOMAC for computer-aided versus traditional TKA. Review Manager 5.3 was used for data synthesis and analysis. Out of 729 records, five RCTs enrolling 339 patients were eligible and analyzed using a random effects meta-analysis. The mean monthly Delta KSS score differed significantly between the traditional and computerized groups (11.47 +/- 8.76 vs. 9.26 +/- 6.05, respectively; p < 0.01). However, the pooled mean difference estimate showed no significant differences (D = 0.20, 95% CI = -0.53 to 0.93, p = 0.59), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 85%, p < 0.001). The mean monthly Delta WOMAC score also differed significantly (-14.18 +/- 21.54 vs. -18.43 +/- 20.65, respectively; p < 0.05), but again, no significant differences were found in the pooled estimate (D = 0.17, 95% CI = -0.46 to 0.79, p = 0.60), with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 28%, p = 0.24).There is no significant difference in KSS or WOMAC outcomes between traditional and computerized TKA. The study suggests the need for further research with longer follow-up periods, more timepoints, and a broader range of patient outcome measures to fully evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each method.
引用
收藏
页码:1530 / 1537
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Alrajeb, Reda ;
Zarti, Mohammed ;
Shuia, Zakaria ;
Alzobi, Osama ;
Ahmed, Ghalib ;
Elmhiregh, Aissam .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (03) :1333-1343
[2]  
BarberWestin SD., KNEESPECIFIC SCALES
[3]  
Decking R, 2007, ACTA CHIR ORTHOP TR, V74, P171
[4]  
Gill S., PATIENT REPORTED OUT
[5]  
Haritinian Emil G, 2013, Maedica (Bucur), V8, P176
[6]  
Hsu H., 2022, StatPearls
[7]   Does Robotic-assisted TKA Result in Better Outcome Scores or Long-Term Survivorship Than Conventional TKA? A Randomized, Controlled Trial [J].
Kim, Young-Hoo ;
Yoon, Sung-Hwan ;
Park, Jang-Won .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 478 (02) :266-275
[8]   Patient-Specific CT-Based Instrumentation versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on Clinical Outcomes and In-Hospital Data [J].
Kotela, Andrzej ;
Lorkowski, Jacek ;
Kucharzewski, Marek ;
Wilk-Franczuk, Magdalena ;
Sliwinski, Zbigniew ;
Franczuk, Boguslaw ;
Legosz, Pawel ;
Kotela, Ireneusz .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
[9]   Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 [J].
Kurtz, Steven ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Mowat, Fionna ;
Halpern, Michael .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (04) :780-785
[10]   Prevalence Trends of Site-Specific Osteoarthritis From 1990 to 2019: Findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 [J].
Long, Huibin ;
Liu, Qiang ;
Yin, Heyong ;
Wang, Kai ;
Diao, Naicheng ;
Zhang, Yuqing ;
Lin, Jianhao ;
Guo, Ai .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 74 (07) :1172-1183