An Indigenous Strengths-based Theoretical Framework

被引:4
作者
Prehn, Jacob [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Social Sci, Social Work, Hobart, TAS, Australia
关键词
Aboriginal; Torres Strait Islander; First Nations; Strengths Perspective; Strengths-based Approach; Deficits; Self-empowerment; Tasmania; Australia; Indigenous Peoples; Self-determination; Social Work Practice; Colonisation; HEALTH; WELL; REPRESENTATION; PERSPECTIVES; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1080/0312407X.2024.2340464
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This article explores the inadequate recognition and integration of the strengths of Indigenous1 people in direct practice, policy development, and research. To address this concern, I present an Indigenous strengths-based theoretical framework designed to recognise and illuminate the diverse strengths inherent in Indigenous people and communities. The ongoing structure of colonisation often presents challenges for practitioners, policymakers, researchers, and others collaborating with Indigenous people to adopt a strengths-based approach. Unfortunately, well-intentioned collaborators, especially non-Indigenous allies, often succumb to deficit-based thinking and simplistic binary comparative analysis. This article draws inspiration from Dennis Saleebey's (2023) six-step, strengths-based approach, integrating it with a micro, meso, and macro framework and Indigenous Standpoint Theory. The result is an Indigenous strengths-based theoretical framework that embraces a strengths-based approach within the context of Indigenous cultures and world views. This framework fosters the identification and development of Indigenous strengths in a respectful and culturally safe manner.IMPLICATIONSA strengths-based approach must supersede the deficit discourse that continues to be a defining feature of how social workers, allied health professionals, researchers, and policymakers interact with Indigenous Australians.This article draws inspiration from Saleebey's (2023. The strengths perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions. In Social work (pp. 230-235). Routledge) six-step approach to a strengths perspective, combined with a systems theory framework and an Indigenous standpoint, and can assist in (re)defining Indigenous strength-based practice.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 158
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [11] Brough M., 2004, Health Promotion Journal of Australia, V15, P215, DOI DOI 10.1071/HE04215
  • [12] Strengths-based case management: Individuals' perspectives on strengths and the case manager relationship
    Brun, C
    Rapp, RC
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK, 2001, 46 (03) : 278 - 288
  • [13] Beyond deficit: 'strengths-based approaches' in Indigenous health research
    Bryant, Joanne
    Bolt, Reuben
    Botfield, Jessica R.
    Martin, Kacey
    Doyle, Michael
    Murphy, Dean
    Graham, Simon
    Newman, Christy E.
    Bell, Stephen
    Treloar, Carla
    Browne, Annette J.
    Aggleton, Peter
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2021, 43 (06) : 1405 - 1421
  • [14] Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men and parenting: a scoping review
    Canuto, Kootsy
    Harfield, Stephen G.
    Canuto, Karla J.
    Brown, Alex
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2020, 26 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [15] "I feel more comfortable speaking to a male": Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men's discourse on utilizing primary health care services
    Canuto, Kootsy
    Wittert, Gary
    Harfield, Stephen
    Brown, Alex
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2018, 17
  • [16] Carson B., 2007, SOCIAL DETERMINANTS
  • [17] Closing the Gap, 2022, National agreement on closing the gap
  • [18] Collard L., 2016, QUOP MAAMAN ABORIGIN
  • [19] Comer L., 2008, Closing the Gaps - Lessons from New Zealand (presentation to Ministerial Council for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs)
  • [20] Closing the Gap: Examining how the problem of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander disadvantage is represented in policy
    Dawson, Jessica
    Augoustinos, Martha
    Sjoberg, David
    Canuto, Kootsy
    Glover, Karen
    Rumbold, Alice
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2021, 56 (04) : 522 - 538