Sexual Orientation-Specific Policies Are Associated With Prenatal Care Use in the First Trimester Among Sexual Minority Women: Results From a Prospective Cohort Study

被引:0
作者
Everett, Bethany G. [1 ]
Bergman, Zoe [1 ]
Charlton, Brittany M. [2 ,3 ]
Barcelona, Veronica [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Sociol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Populat Med, Cambridge, MA USA
[3] Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Prenatal care; Sexual orientation; Policy; Health status disparity; HEALTH-CARE; SAME-SEX; STRUCTURAL STIGMA; DISPARITIES; ACCESS; EXPERIENCES; INDIVIDUALS; INSURANCE; COVERAGE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1093/abm/kaae037
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background Previous research has shown sexual minority women (SMW) are more likely to report multiple maternal and infant health outcomes compared to heterosexual women and that these outcomes are moderated by the policy environment. Little is known, however, about prenatal care use disparities or the social determinants of prenatal care use for SMW.Purpose To examine the relationship between sexual orientation-specific policies that confer legal protections (e.g., hate crime protections, housing discrimination, same-sex marriage) and prenatal care use among women using a prospective, population-based data set.Methods Using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health and logistic regression, we link measures of state policies to the use of prenatal care in the first trimester among women who had live births. The use of prospective data allows us to adjust for covariates associated with preconception care use prior to pregnancy (n = 586 singleton births to SMW; n = 4,539 singleton births to heterosexual women).Results Sexual orientation-specific policies that conferred protections were associated with increased use of prenatal care among pregnancies reported by SMW (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.16, 2.96). In fact, in states with zero protections, we found no differences in prenatal care use by sexual minority status; however, in states with two or more protective policies, SMW were more likely to access prenatal care in the first trimester than heterosexual women. There was no relationship between sexual orientation-specific policy environments and prenatal care use among pregnancies reported by heterosexual women.Conclusions Recent research has documented that SMW are more likely to have adverse perinatal and obstetrical outcomes than their heterosexual peers. These findings suggest that Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual-specific policy protections may facilitate the use of prenatal care among SMW, a potentially important pathway to improve reproductive health among this population. Previous studies have found that sexual minority women (SMW) are more likely to report adverse infant outcomes, particularly for women who do not live in states with anti-discrimination policies against lesiban, gay, bisexual, transgnder, or queer (LGBTQ) populations. This is the first to examine sexual orientation disparities in prenatal care use using a nationally representative, prospective data set. Additionally, we examined whether prenatal care use varied by the number of state-level policies that protect against discrimination based on sexual orientation. Our results show high rates of prenatal care use in the first trimester across all sexual orientations, however, in states with states with two or more policies that prevent discrimination by sexual orientation, sexual minority women were more likely to access prenatal care in the first trimester than heterosexual women. These findings suggest that more inclusive state-level environments promote healthcare-seeking behaviors during pregnancy for sexual minority women.
引用
收藏
页码:594 / 602
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Access to Obstetric Care in the United States from the National Health Interview Survey
    Anderson, Jamie E.
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 29 (02) : 141 - 147
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, Obstet Gynecol, V116, P240, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e8b0a9
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2024, Mapping attacks on LGBTQ rights in U.S. state legislatures in 2024
  • [4] Separate and unequal: The effect of unequal access to employment-based health insurance on same-sex and unmarried different-sex couples
    Ash, Michael A.
    Badgett, M. V. Lee
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2006, 24 (04) : 582 - 599
  • [5] Time of Pregnancy Recognition and Prenatal Care Use: A Population-based Study in the United States
    Ayoola, Adejoke B.
    Nettleman, Mary D.
    Stommel, Manfred
    Canady, Renee B.
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2010, 37 (01): : 37 - 43
  • [6] A Systematic Review of the Discrimination Against Sexual and Gender Minority in Health Care Settings
    Balik, Cemile Hurrem Ayhan
    Bilgin, Hiilya
    Uluman, Ozgu Tekin
    Sukut, Ozge
    Yilmaz, Sevil
    Buzlu, Sevim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 2020, 50 (01): : 44 - 61
  • [7] Bartelt E, 2017, J BISEXUALITY, V17, P378, DOI 10.1080/15299716.2017.1384947
  • [8] An Interdisciplinary Approach to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Clinical Competence, Professional Training, and Ethical Care: Introduction to the Special Issue
    Bidell, Markus P.
    Stepleman, Lara M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY, 2017, 64 (10) : 1305 - 1329
  • [9] Social determinants of health and disparities in prenatal care utilization during the Great Recession period 2005-2010
    Blakeney, Erin L.
    Herting, Jerald R.
    Bekemeier, Betty
    Zierler, Brenda K.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [10] Disparities in Health Insurance Coverage, Access, and Outcomes for Individuals in Same-Sex Versus Different-Sex Relationships, 2000-2007
    Buchmueller, Thomas
    Carpenter, Christopher S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 100 (03) : 489 - 495