Decreased Patellar Fractures and Subluxation With Patellar Component Replacement at Stage-One Spacer

被引:0
|
作者
Rainey, Joshua P. [1 ]
Blackburn, Brenna E. [1 ]
Moore, Zachary J. [1 ]
Archibeck, Michael J. [1 ]
Pelt, Christopher E. [1 ]
Anderson, Lucas A. [1 ]
Gililland, Jeremy M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84018 USA
关键词
periprosthetic joint injection; total knee arthroplasty; revision knee arthroplasty; 2-stage revision; knee spacer; patellar fracture; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; REVISION; RISK; HIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.076
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection is a devastating complication of total knee arthroplasty and is often treated with 2-stage revision. We retrospectively assessed whether replacing the patellar component with articulating stage-one spacers was associated with improved outcomes compared to spacers without patellar component replacement. Methods: A total of 139 patients from a single academic institution were identified who underwent an articulating stage-one revision total knee arthroplasty and had at least 1-year follow-up. Of the 139 patients, 91 underwent patellar component removal without replacement, while 48 had a patellar component replaced at stage-one revision. Patellar fracture and reinfection at any point after stage-one were recorded. Knee range of motion (ROM), patellar thickness, lateral tilt, and lateral displacement were measured at 6-weeks post stage-one. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t-tests were utilized for comparisons. There were no significant demographic differences between groups. Results: Patellar component replacement at stage-one revision was associated with fewer patellar fractures (2.1 versus 12.1%, P = .046), less lateral patellar displacement (1.7 versus 16.0 mm, P <.01), and improved pre to postoperative knee ROM 6 weeks after stage-one (+5.9 versus -11.4 degrees, P = .03). There was no difference in reinfections after stage-2 revision for the replaced or unreplaced patellar groups (15.4 versus 15%, P = 1.000). While the mean time between stage-one and stage-2 was not different (5.2 versus 4.5 months, P = .50), at one-year follow-up, significantly more patients in the patellar component replacement group were satisfied and refused stage-2 revision (45.8 versus 3.3%, P < .001). Conclusions: Replacing the patellar component at stage-one revision is associated with a decreased rate of patellar fracture and lateral patellar subluxation, improved ROM, and possible increased patient satisfaction, as reflected by nearly half of these patients electing to keep their spacer. There was no difference in reinfection rates between the cohorts. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S315 / S320
页数:6
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Causes andmanagement of patellar instability after total knee replacement. Lateralization, subluxation and luxation
    Heller, K. -D.
    ORTHOPADE, 2016, 45 (05): : 399 - 406
  • [2] ALT flap with vascularized fascia lata for one-stage functional patellar tendon reconstruction
    Sapino, G.
    Zaugg, P.
    Cherix, S.
    Borens, O.
    Lo, S. J.
    Raffoul, W.
    di Summa, P. G.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2019, 72 (03) : 467 - 476
  • [3] A case-control study of spontaneous patellar fractures following primary total knee replacement
    Seo, J. G.
    Moon, Y. W.
    Park, S. H.
    Lee, J. H.
    Kang, H. M.
    Kim, S. M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2012, 94B (07): : 908 - 913
  • [4] Periprosthetic hip infection treated with two-stage stage-one Select Spacer-complication rate and restoration of anatomy
    Kipp, Josephine Olsen
    Lamm, Martin
    Soballe, Kjeld
    Jakobsen, Stig Storgaard
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 18 : 138 - 142
  • [5] One-stage reconstruction of skin defect and patellar tendon rupture after total knee arthroplasty - A new technique
    Chiou, HM
    Chang, MC
    Lo, WH
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1997, 12 (05) : 575 - 579