The pandemic that shocked managers across the world: The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on leadership behavior

被引:35
作者
Garretsen, Harry [1 ]
Stoker, Janka I. [1 ]
Soudis, Dimitrios [1 ]
Wendt, Hein [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, POB 800, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Korn Ferry, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
COVID-19; Differences-in-differences; Directive leadership; Participative leadership; Threat-rigidity hypothesis; Crisis; Exogenous shocks; Working From Home; THREAT; CULTURE; PERFORMANCE; LEVEL; DIMENSIONS; CONTEXT; STYLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101630
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In March 2020, the COVID-19 virus turned into a pandemic that hit organizations globally. This pandemic qualifies as an exogenous shock. Based on the threat-rigidity hypothesis, we hypothesize that this shock led to an increase in directive leadership behavior. We also argue that this relationship depends on the magnitude of the crisis and on well-learned responses of managers. In our empirical analysis we employ a differences-in- differences design with treatment intensity and focus on the period of the first lockdown, March until June 2020. Using a dataset covering monthly data for almost 27,000 managers across 48 countries and 32 sectors for January 2019 to December 2020, we find support for the threat-rigidity hypothesis. During the first lockdown, directive leadership increased significantly. We also find that this relationship is moderated by COVID- 19 deaths per country, the sectoral working from home potential, and the organizational level of management. Our findings provide new evidence how large exogenous shocks like COVID-19 can impact leadership behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [21] Economic perspectives on leadership: Concepts, causality, and context in leadership research
    Garretsen, Harry
    Stoker, Janka, I
    Weber, Roberto A.
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2020, 31 (03)
  • [22] Gilbert CG, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P741, DOI 10.2307/20159695
  • [23] GLADSTEIN DL, 1985, ACAD MANAGE J, V28, P613, DOI 10.5465/256117
  • [24] Hale T, 2020, Variation in government responses to COVID-19
  • [25] Economic assumptions and economic context: Implications for the study of leadership
    Hiller, Nathan J.
    Piccolo, Ronald F.
    Zaccaro, Stephen J.
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2020, 31 (03)
  • [26] Hlavac Marek, 2022, CRAN
  • [27] Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture
    Hofstede, G
    McCrae, RR
    [J]. CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (01) : 52 - 88
  • [28] Hofstede G., 1991, CULTURES ORG
  • [29] Hofstede Geert, 1980, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00184-5
  • [30] Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE
    House, R
    Javidan, M
    Hanges, P
    Dorfman, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2002, 37 (01) : 3 - 10