The pandemic that shocked managers across the world: The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on leadership behavior

被引:35
作者
Garretsen, Harry [1 ]
Stoker, Janka I. [1 ]
Soudis, Dimitrios [1 ]
Wendt, Hein [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, POB 800, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Korn Ferry, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
COVID-19; Differences-in-differences; Directive leadership; Participative leadership; Threat-rigidity hypothesis; Crisis; Exogenous shocks; Working From Home; THREAT; CULTURE; PERFORMANCE; LEVEL; DIMENSIONS; CONTEXT; STYLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101630
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In March 2020, the COVID-19 virus turned into a pandemic that hit organizations globally. This pandemic qualifies as an exogenous shock. Based on the threat-rigidity hypothesis, we hypothesize that this shock led to an increase in directive leadership behavior. We also argue that this relationship depends on the magnitude of the crisis and on well-learned responses of managers. In our empirical analysis we employ a differences-in- differences design with treatment intensity and focus on the period of the first lockdown, March until June 2020. Using a dataset covering monthly data for almost 27,000 managers across 48 countries and 32 sectors for January 2019 to December 2020, we find support for the threat-rigidity hypothesis. During the first lockdown, directive leadership increased significantly. We also find that this relationship is moderated by COVID- 19 deaths per country, the sectoral working from home potential, and the organizational level of management. Our findings provide new evidence how large exogenous shocks like COVID-19 can impact leadership behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Walking New Avenues in Management Research Methods and Theories: Bridging Micro and Macro Domains
    Aguinis, Herman
    Boyd, Brian K.
    Pierce, Charles A.
    Short, Jeremy C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2011, 37 (02) : 395 - 403
  • [2] Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
  • [3] Antonakis J., 2014, The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations, V1, P93, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199755615.013.007
  • [4] On Ignoring the Random Effects Assumption in Multilevel Models: Review, Critique, and Recommendations
    Antonakis, John
    Bastardoz, Nicolas
    Roenkkoe, Mikko
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2021, 24 (02) : 443 - 483
  • [5] The Leadership Quarterly: State of the journal
    Antonakis, John
    Banks, George C.
    Bastardoz, Nicolas
    Cole, Michael S.
    Day, David V.
    Eagly, Alice H.
    Epitropaki, Olga
    Foti, Roseanne R.
    Gardner, William L.
    Haslam, S. Alexander
    Hogg, Michael A.
    Kark, Ronit
    Lowe, Kevin B.
    Podsakoff, Philip M.
    Spain, Seth M.
    Stoker, Janka I.
    Van Quaquebeke, Niels
    van Vugt, Mark
    Vera, Dusya
    Weber, Roberto
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2019, 30 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [6] On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications
    Antonakis, John
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2017, 28 (01) : 5 - 21
  • [7] On making causal claims: A review and recommendations
    Antonakis, John
    Bendahan, Samuel
    Jacquart, Philippe
    Lalive, Rafael
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2010, 21 (06) : 1086 - 1120
  • [8] ARE SCORES ON HOFSTEDE'S DIMENSIONS OF NATIONAL CULTURE STABLE OVER TIME? A COHORT ANALYSIS
    Beugelsdijk, Sjoerd
    Maseland, Robbert
    van Hoorn, Andre
    [J]. GLOBAL STRATEGY JOURNAL, 2015, 5 (03) : 223 - 240
  • [9] Back to Basics with Mixed-Effects Models: Nine Take-Away Points
    Bliese, Paul D.
    Maltarich, Mark A.
    Hendricks, Jonathan L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 33 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [10] When the Boss Is Away: Manager-Worker Separation and Worker Performance in a Multisite Software Maintenance Organization
    Bonet, Rocio
    Salvador, Fabrizio
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2017, 28 (02) : 244 - 261