Perspectives on telehealth implementation in Australia: An exploratory qualitative study with practice managers and general practitioners

被引:1
作者
Savira, Feby [1 ,2 ]
Sanigorski, Andrew [2 ]
Narama, Kevin Mc [4 ]
Hensher, Martin [4 ]
Peeters, Anna [5 ]
Manias, Elizabeth [3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Inst Hlth Transformat, Sch Hlth & Social Dev, Deakin Hlth Econ, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Inst Hlth Transformat, Global Obes Ctr, Sch Hlth & Social Dev, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[3] Deakin Univ, Sch Med, Deakin Rural Hlth, Warrnambool, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[5] Deakin Univ, Inst Hlth Transformat, Sch Hlth & Social Dev, Burwood, Vic, Australia
[6] Deakin Univ, Inst Hlth Transformat, Ctr Qual & Patient Safety Res, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Burwood, Vic, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Clayton, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Telehealth; Primary care; General practice; COVID-19; Implementation; Qualitative;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105473
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background: There is a lack of understanding regarding the impact of telehealth on clinical delivery and the feasibility of sustained implementation by health services. The COVID-19 pandemic provided an ideal opportunity to identify factors related to the implementation of telehealth. This study assessed factors that influenced telehealth implementation during COVID-19 in the Western region of Victoria, Australia, from the perspectives of practice managers and general practitioners (GPs). Methods: Employing a qualitative approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 GPs and 11 practice managers across metropolitan and rural settings in the Western region of Victoria, Australia. Interviews were conducted between December 2021 to June 2022, which included periods during and beyond the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Themes were synthesised using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, which comprised five domains: innovation, inner setting, outer setting, individuals and implementation process. An additional domain related to billing and finances was added. Results: The innovation domain revealed that telehealth was identified by both stakeholder groups as a critical tool for improving healthcare access for vulnerable patients. GPs highlighted the role of telehealth in follow-up care and the need for extended telephone consultation services. For the implementation process, both stakeholder groups identified a shift in attitudes among GPs from reluctance to acceptance of telehealth. In terms of outer setting, constant changes in regulations posed challenges to administrative staff. Practice managers faced difficulties in acquiring information on changes, but those with robust professional networks were well supported. Initial loss of incentive funding and government-imposed billing methods posed hurdles for clinics. Both stakeholder groups highlighted the need for education around videoconference and a standardised telehealth platform. Conclusion: Evolving telehealth regulations during the emergence of COVID-19 posed financial, operational and administrative challenges to primary care clinics. To ensure sustainability, policymakers should improve stakeholder communication, set interoperability standards, and ensure sustainable funding for telehealth.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
ABS, 2016, 0.55.001-Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA)
[2]  
ABS, 2023, Experince of Telehealth Services
[3]  
ABS, 2016, South-West Coast (Western Victoria) - 2016 Census All persons QuickStats
[4]  
ABS, 2022, Patient Experiences - Experience of telehealth services
[5]   Patient satisfaction and acceptability with telehealth at specialist medical outpatient clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia [J].
Adams, Lucinda ;
Lester, Susan ;
Hoon, Elizabeth ;
van Der Haak, Heather ;
Proudman, Charlotte ;
Hall, Cindy ;
Whittle, Samuel ;
Proudman, Susanna ;
Hill, Catherine L. .
INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2021, 51 (07) :1028-1037
[6]  
Andino JJ, 2021, UROL PRACT, V8, P53, DOI [10.1097/upj.0000000000000149, 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000149]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, COVID-19 Temporary MBS Telehealth Services
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2022, MODIFIED MONASH MODE
[9]   A comparison study between metropolitan and rural hospital-based telehealth activity to inform adoption and expansion [J].
Banbury, Annie ;
Smith, Anthony C. ;
Mehrotra, Ateev ;
Page, Matthew ;
Caffery, Liam J. .
JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2023, 29 (07) :540-551
[10]  
Beheshti Leila, 2022, Perspect Health Inf Manag, V19, p1n