EXPLORING THE EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN FUNCTION STRUCTURE MODELING BEHAVIORS

被引:0
作者
Patel, Apurva [1 ]
Summers, Joshua D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Mech Engn, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Mech Engn, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2021 INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, IDETC-CIE2021, VOL 6 | 2021年
关键词
function modeling; individual differences; SYSTEMATIZING QUOTIENT; IDENTIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; EMPATHY; AUTISM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper presents an exploratory study conducted to understand the role of individual differences between designers in the function modeling process and with respect to final models. An input-process-output framework of function modeling is proposed to systematically approach this theory building and discovery research study. Four measures of individual differences are identified of interest. These include the systemizing quotient, goal orientation, risk propensity, and concept design thinking style. Each metric is composed of multiple items that can be assessed through survey instruments. A previously developed protocol study is used to capture function modeling behaviors and a final function structure model. Data collected from the survey instruments and protocol study is processed to generate input, process, and output measures. A regression-based analysis is used to identify correlations in three groups: input-process, input-output, and process-output. Potential correlations of interest are identified within each group. Implications of these correlations are discussed from a function structure modeling perspective and hypotheses for future research are identified based on the patterns observed in this study. Three testable hypotheses are proposed for future investigation: (1) Goal orientation has no effect on activity distribution in the function modeling process, (2) Thinking style has no effect on the function modeling process, and (3) Risk propensity has no effect on element distribution in the function modeling process. Finally, an anticipated experiment is outlined to investigate one of the potential relationships discovered in this study.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Comparing learning outcomes in physical and simulated learning environments [J].
Alfred, Myrtede ;
Neyens, David M. ;
Gramopadhye, Anand K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2018, 68 :110-117
[2]   Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners [J].
Atman, Cynthia J. ;
Adams, Robin S. ;
Cardella, Monica E. ;
Turns, Jennifer ;
Mosborg, Susan ;
Saleem, Jason .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 96 (04) :359-379
[3]  
Autrey M. J. L., 2016, 2016 ASEE ANN C EXP
[4]   The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences [J].
Baron-Cohen, S ;
Richler, J ;
Bisarya, D ;
Gurunathan, N ;
Wheelwright, S .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 358 (1430) :361-374
[5]   Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation [J].
Button, SB ;
Mathieu, JE ;
Zajac, DM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (01) :26-48
[6]   Where next for design research? Understanding research impact and theory building [J].
Cash, Philip .
DESIGN STUDIES, 2020, 68 :113-141
[7]  
Chickarello D, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 7
[8]  
Chou S., 2020, Exploring Designer Context' in Engineering Design: The Relationship Between Self, Environment, and Design Methods
[9]  
Christiaans H.H.C.M., 1992, Design Theory and Methodology, V42, P131
[10]  
Chyung S.Y., 2010, The Journal of Effective Teaching, V10, P22