Numerical Investigation of Seismic Behaviour for a Flexible Cantilever Retaining Wall with Cohesive Backfill

被引:0
作者
El Yamouni, Bouraida [1 ]
El Khannoussi, Fadoua [2 ]
Khamlichi, Abdellatif [1 ]
机构
[1] Abdelmalek Essaadi Univ, Natl Sch Appl Sci Tetouan, Lab ICST, Res Team 3M, Tetouan, Morocco
[2] Abdelmalek Essaadi Univ, Natl Sch Appl Sci Tetouan, Lab ICST, Res Team AMSCG, Tetouan, Morocco
关键词
Flexible retaining wall; Seismic response; Dynamic earth pressure; Cohesive soil; Analytical methods; Finite element method; SOIL;
D O I
10.4028/p-Z3wyLG
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the seismic design of flexible cantilever walls retaining cohesive backfill soil, it is a common practice to neglect the cohesion effect. Dynamic lateral earth pressure is typically evaluated based on approaches primarily intended for cohesionless soils or through analytical pseudo-static methods. Nevertheless, both experimental and theoretical evidence have demonstrated significant effects due to soil cohesion that are not accounted for by these methods. This study involved finite element modelling (FE) of a flexible cantilever wall with a height of 5.4m, supporting homogeneous cohesive backfill under initial static and seismic loadings. The calculated active earth thrust was then compared with values obtained experimentally and through conventional analytical methods. The obtained results indicate that the presence of soil cohesion significantly reduces seismic demands on flexible cantilever retaining walls, resulting in a substantial reduction of seismic active earth pressures and total seismic thrust by up to 50% and 52%, respectively. It also enhances the overall stability of the system by shifting the point of application of seismic thrust toward the base of the wall, thereby increasing the safety margin. In addition, it significantly decreases the wall displacement at the stem top, with reductions of up to 104% compared to the case involving cohesionless backfill. It was observed that the conventional methods recommended by some seismic regulations largely underestimate seismic active pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 142
页数:18
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [11] Kitsis VG., 2022, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., V160, P8
  • [12] Investigation of seismic response of cantilever retaining walls: Limit analysis vs shaking table testing
    Kloukinas, Panos
    di Santolo, Anna Scotto
    Penna, Augusto
    Dietz, Matthew
    Evangelista, Aldo
    Simonelli, Armando Lucio
    Taylor, Colin
    Mylonakis, George
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2015, 77 : 432 - 445
  • [13] Lew M., 2010, P EARTH RET C, V3
  • [14] Mononobe N., 1929, P WORLD ENG C, V9, P179, DOI DOI 10.1142/S1793431108000256
  • [15] 1 g Shaking table model tests on seismic active earth pressure acting on retaining wall with cohesive backfill soil
    Nakajima, Susumu
    Ozaki, Takumi
    Sanagawa, Taisuke
    [J]. SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2021, 61 (05) : 1251 - 1272
  • [16] Okabe S, 1924, J Japan Soc Civ Eng, V10, P1277
  • [17] The effect of backfill cohesion on seismic response of cantilever retaining walls using fully dynamic analysis
    Osouli, Abdolreza
    Zamiran, Siavash
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2017, 89 : 143 - 152
  • [18] Prakash S., 1966, P 3 S EARTHQUAKE ENG, V1, P277
  • [19] Prakashi S., 1981, P INT C RECENT ADV G, VIII, P1
  • [20] Prashant A., 2022, J. Earthq. Eng., V27, P1