Comparison of Multiparametric MRI and the Combination of PSMA Plus MRI for the Intraprostatic Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Torri, Giovanni Brondani [1 ]
Pereira, Pedro Antune [2 ]
Wiethan, Camila Piovesan [1 ]
Mesquita, Yasmin [3 ]
Mirshahvalad, Seyed Ali [2 ]
Veit-Haibach, Patrick [2 ]
Ghai, Sangeet [2 ]
Metser, Ur [2 ]
Altmayer, Stephan [4 ]
Dias, Adriano Basso [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Hosp Univ Santa Maria, Dept Radiol & Diagnost Imaging, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Toronto, Univ Med Imaging Toronto, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Fed Rio De Janeiro, Div Med, Macae, RJ, Brazil
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
MRI; prostate-specific membrane antigen; PET; prostatic cancer; meta-analysis; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; GA-68-PSMA PET/CT; ACCURACY; PET/MRI; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1097/RLU.0000000000005265
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeThe aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and the combination of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET plus MRI (PSMA + MRI) for detecting intraprostatic clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).Patients and MethodsRelevant databases were searched through November 2023. Only studies directly comparing mpMRI and PSMA + MRI (PET/MRI or PET/CT + mpMRI) were included. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for each approach.ResultsA total of 19 studies were included. On a patient-level analysis, PSMA + MRI had higher sensitivity (9 studies) than mpMRI for csPCa detection (96% [95% confidence interval (CI): 92%, 98%] vs 89% [95% CI: 81%, 94%]; P = 0.04). The patient-level specificity (4 studies) of PSMA + MRI was 55% (95% CI: 31%-76%) compared with 50% (95% CI: 44%-57%) of mpMRI (P = 0.67). Region-level sensitivity (10 studies) was 85% (95% CI: 74%-92%) for PSMA + MRI and 71% (95% CI: 58%-82%) for mpMRI (P = 0.09), whereas specificity (4 studies) was 87% (95% CI: 76%-94%) and 90% (95% CI: 82%-95%), respectively (P = 0.59). Lesion-level sensitivity and specificity were similar between modalities with pooled data from less than 4 studies.ConclusionsPSMA + MRI had superior pooled sensitivity and similar specificity for the detection of csPCa compared with mpMRI in this meta-analysis of head-to-head studies.
引用
收藏
页码:e375 / e382
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Could Biparametric MRI Replace Multiparametric MRI in the Management of Prostate Cancer?
    Iacob, Roxana
    Stoicescu, Emil-Robert
    Cerbu, Simona
    Manolescu, Diana-Luminita
    Bardan, Razvan
    Cumpanas, Alin
    LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [42] PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET: a better choice than multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis?
    Zhang, Xiao
    Son, Mai Hong
    Ha, Le Ngoc
    Lan, Xiaoli
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 12 (06): : 195 - 200
  • [43] Can We Improve the Preoperative Prediction of Prostate Cancer Recurrence With Multiparametric MRI?
    Capogrosso, Paolo
    Vertosick, Emily A.
    Benfante, Nicole E.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Eastham, James A.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (04) : E745 - E750
  • [44] Conventional imaging and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance (MRI, MRS, DWI, MRP) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Panebianco, V.
    Sciarra, A.
    Marcantonio, A.
    Forte, V.
    Biondi, T.
    Laghi, A.
    Catalano, C.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 56 (04) : 331 - 342
  • [45] 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI versus multiparametric MRI in men referred for prostate biopsy: primary tumour localization and interreader agreement
    Ferraro, Daniela A.
    Hoetker, Andreas M.
    Becker, Anton S.
    Mebert, Iliana
    Laudicella, Riccardo
    Baltensperger, Anka
    Rupp, Niels J.
    Rueschoff, Jan H.
    Mueller, Julian
    Mortezavi, Ashkan
    Sapienza, Marcelo T.
    Eberli, Daniel
    Donati, Olivio F.
    Burger, Irene A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HYBRID IMAGING, 2022, 6 (01):
  • [46] Reproducibility and Accuracy of the PRIMARY Score on PSMA PET and of PI-RADS on Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Within a Real-World Database
    Emmett, Louise
    Papa, Nathan
    Counter, William
    Calais, Jeremie
    Barbato, Francesco
    Burger, Irene
    Eiber, Matthias
    Roberts, Matthew J.
    Agrawal, Shikha
    Franklin, Anthony
    Xue, Alan
    Rasiah, Krishan
    John, Nikeith
    Moon, Daniel
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Yaxley, John
    Stricker, Phillip
    Wong, Keith
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Gianduzzo, Troy
    Kua, Boon
    Ho, Bao
    Nguyen, Andrew
    Liu, Victor
    Lee, Jonathan
    Hsiao, Edward
    Sutherland, Tom
    Perry, Elisa
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Hope, Thomas A.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 65 (01) : 94 - 99
  • [47] Head-to-Head Comparison Between Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Woo, Sungmin
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Kim, Sang Youn
    Cho, Jeong Yeon
    Kim, Seung Hyup
    Moon, Min Hoan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (05) : W226 - W241
  • [48] 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET: Better at Detecting Prostate Cancer than Multiparametric MRI?
    Civelek, A. Cahid
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 738 - 739
  • [49] The dose distribution in dominant intraprostatic tumour lesions defined by multiparametric MRI and PSMA PET/CT correlates with the outcome in patients treated with primary radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Zamboglou, Constantinos
    Klein, Christina Marie
    Thomann, Benedikt
    Fassbender, Thomas Franz
    Rischke, Hans C.
    Kirste, Simon
    Henne, Karl
    Volegova-Neher, Natalja
    Bock, Michael
    Langer, Mathias
    Meyer, Philipp T.
    Baltas, Dimos
    Grosu, Anca L.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13
  • [50] Comparison of PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and pelvic multiparametric MRI for lesion detection in the pelvis in patients with prostate cancer
    Nguyen, Trinh
    Bhosale, Priya R.
    Xu, Guofan
    Pan, Tinsu
    Wei, Peng
    Lu, Yang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 12 (06): : 166 - 179