Comparison of Multiparametric MRI and the Combination of PSMA Plus MRI for the Intraprostatic Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Torri, Giovanni Brondani [1 ]
Pereira, Pedro Antune [2 ]
Wiethan, Camila Piovesan [1 ]
Mesquita, Yasmin [3 ]
Mirshahvalad, Seyed Ali [2 ]
Veit-Haibach, Patrick [2 ]
Ghai, Sangeet [2 ]
Metser, Ur [2 ]
Altmayer, Stephan [4 ]
Dias, Adriano Basso [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Hosp Univ Santa Maria, Dept Radiol & Diagnost Imaging, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Toronto, Univ Med Imaging Toronto, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Fed Rio De Janeiro, Div Med, Macae, RJ, Brazil
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
MRI; prostate-specific membrane antigen; PET; prostatic cancer; meta-analysis; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; GA-68-PSMA PET/CT; ACCURACY; PET/MRI; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1097/RLU.0000000000005265
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeThe aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and the combination of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET plus MRI (PSMA + MRI) for detecting intraprostatic clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).Patients and MethodsRelevant databases were searched through November 2023. Only studies directly comparing mpMRI and PSMA + MRI (PET/MRI or PET/CT + mpMRI) were included. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for each approach.ResultsA total of 19 studies were included. On a patient-level analysis, PSMA + MRI had higher sensitivity (9 studies) than mpMRI for csPCa detection (96% [95% confidence interval (CI): 92%, 98%] vs 89% [95% CI: 81%, 94%]; P = 0.04). The patient-level specificity (4 studies) of PSMA + MRI was 55% (95% CI: 31%-76%) compared with 50% (95% CI: 44%-57%) of mpMRI (P = 0.67). Region-level sensitivity (10 studies) was 85% (95% CI: 74%-92%) for PSMA + MRI and 71% (95% CI: 58%-82%) for mpMRI (P = 0.09), whereas specificity (4 studies) was 87% (95% CI: 76%-94%) and 90% (95% CI: 82%-95%), respectively (P = 0.59). Lesion-level sensitivity and specificity were similar between modalities with pooled data from less than 4 studies.ConclusionsPSMA + MRI had superior pooled sensitivity and similar specificity for the detection of csPCa compared with mpMRI in this meta-analysis of head-to-head studies.
引用
收藏
页码:e375 / e382
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for the detection of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Zhou, Chuanchi
    Tang, Yongxiang
    Deng, Zhihe
    Yang, Jinhui
    Zhou, Ming
    Wang, Long
    Hu, Shuo
    EJNMMI RESEARCH, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [2] Prostate MRI and PSMA-PET in the Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Cereser, Lorenzo
    Evangelista, Laura
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Girometti, Rossano
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (16)
  • [3] Comparison of PSMA-ligand PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in the pelvis
    Afshar-Oromieh, Ali
    Vollnberg, Bernd
    Alberts, Ian
    Baehler, Alexandrine
    Sachpekidis, Christos
    Dijkstra, Lotte
    Haupt, Fabian
    Boxler, Silvan
    Gross, Tobias
    Holland-Letz, Tim
    Thalmann, George
    Heverhagen, Johannes
    Rominger, Axel
    Haermae, Kirsi
    Maurer, Martin H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (11) : 2289 - 2297
  • [4] Comparison of PET/MRI with multiparametric MRI in diagnosis of primary prostate cancer: A meta-analysis
    Li, Mou
    Huang, Zixing
    Yu, Haopeng
    Wang, Yi
    Zhang, Yongchang
    Song, Bin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 113 : 225 - 231
  • [5] Comparison of PSMA-ligand PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in the pelvis
    Ali Afshar-Oromieh
    Bernd Vollnberg
    Ian Alberts
    Alexandrine Bähler
    Christos Sachpekidis
    Lotte Dijkstra
    Fabian Haupt
    Silvan Boxler
    Tobias Gross
    Tim Holland-Letz
    George Thalmann
    Johannes Heverhagen
    Axel Rominger
    Kirsi Härmä
    Martin H. Maurer
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2019, 46 : 2289 - 2297
  • [6] Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of pretreatment patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
    Ma, Jianglei
    Yang, Qinqin
    Ye, Xiaofei
    Xu, Weidong
    Chang, Yifan
    Chen, Rui
    Wang, Ye
    Luo, Mengting
    Lou, Yihaoyun
    Yang, Xuming
    Li, Duocai
    Xu, Yusi
    He, Wei
    Cai, Minglei
    Cao, Wanli
    Ju, Guanqun
    Yin, Lei
    Wang, Junkai
    Ren, Jizhong
    Ma, Zifang
    Zuo, Changjing
    Ren, Shancheng
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (6) : 4017 - 4037
  • [7] Role of multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: update
    Rosi, Giovanni
    Indino, Elena Lucia
    Salvo, Vincenzo
    Colarieti, Anna
    Fierro, Davide
    Scialpi, Michele
    Panebianco, Valeria
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2016, 83 (02) : 61 - 67
  • [8] Multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer - a generational change
    Thompson, Les C.
    Pokorny, Morgan R.
    AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2015, 44 (08) : 597 - 602
  • [9] Multiparametric MRI and MRI/TRUS Fusion Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Kesch, Claudia
    Dieffenbacher, Svenja
    Bonekamp, David
    Hadaschik, Boris Alexander
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    MOLECULAR & DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER: CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES, 2019, 1126 : 87 - 98
  • [10] Multiparametric MRI identifies and stratifies prostate cancer lesions: Implications for targeting intraprostatic targets
    Anderson, Erik S.
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Mesko, Shane
    Banerjee, Robyn
    Wang, Pin-Chieh
    Demanes, D. Jeffrey
    Kupelian, Patrick
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2014, 13 (03) : 292 - 298