A systematic literature review on risk perception of Artificial Narrow Intelligence

被引:1
作者
Krieger, Jonas Benjamin [1 ,6 ]
Bouder, Frederic [2 ]
Wibral, Matthias [3 ]
Almeida, Rui Jorge [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] United Nations Univ UNU MERIT, Sch Business & Econ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Stavanger, Dept Safety Econ & Planning, Stavanger, Norway
[3] Univ Maastricht, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Microecon & Publ Econ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Maastricht, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Data Analyt & Digitalisat, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Maastricht, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Quantitat Econometr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht Econ & Social Res Inst Innovat & Techno, unu MeriT, Boschstr 24, NL-6211 AX Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Risk Perception; Risk; Artificial Intelligence; AI; Artificial Narrow Intelligence; ANI; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; PERCEIVED RISK; TRUST; ANTHROPOMORPHISM; ACCEPTANCE; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; SERVICES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1080/13669877.2024.2350725
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has captured global attention recently, prompting the need to understand how associated risks are perceived. This paper attempts to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of the topic, focusing especially on the most problematic area of Artificial Narrow Intelligence. Utilising a systematic literature review, we examined 64 studies focusing on both statistical and qualitative aspects of AI risk perceptions. This research shows that current publications focus on Asia and North America, with the number of publications increasing significantly over the last three years. Research focuses primarily on three domains: Health, consumer behaviour and finance. This study has identified key factors that influence AI risk perceptions, including familiarity, trust and privacy, while also recognising confounding variables such as gender and political orientation. Still, one crucial shortcoming in existing literature emerges: While numerous studies examine how AI risk perceptions are conceived, there is a lack of systematic research on the formation of these perceptions.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 130 条
  • [51] Hitchcock J.L., 2001, RISK HLTH SAFETY ENV, V12, P179
  • [52] Experiencing power over AI: The fit effect of perceived power and desire for power on consumers' choice for voice shopping
    Hu, Peng
    Lu, Yaobin
    Wang, Bin
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2022, 128
  • [53] Hutson Matthew., 2019, Science
  • [54] IBM Cloud Education, 2021, What Is Artificial Intelligence (AI)?
  • [55] The songlines of risk
    Jasanoff, S
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 1999, 8 (02) : 135 - 152
  • [56] Johnson Branden B., 1996, Final Report
  • [57] Political conservatism as motivated social cognition
    Jost, JT
    Glaser, J
    Kruglanski, AW
    Sulloway, FJ
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 129 (03) : 339 - 375
  • [58] Measuring Cigarette Smoking Risk Perceptions
    Kaufman, Annette R.
    Twesten, Jenny E.
    Suls, Jerry
    McCaul, Kevin D.
    Ostroff, Jamie S.
    Ferrer, Rebecca A.
    Brewer, Noel T.
    Cameron, Linda D.
    Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie
    Hay, Jennifer L.
    Park, Elyse R.
    Peters, Ellen
    Strong, David R.
    Waters, Erika A.
    Weinstein, Neil D.
    Windschitl, Paul D.
    Klein, William M. P.
    [J]. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (11) : 1937 - 1945
  • [59] Gaming with Mr. Slot or Gaming the Slot Machine? Power, Anthropomorphism, and Risk Perception
    Kim, Sara
    McGill, Ann L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2011, 38 (01) : 94 - 107
  • [60] Eliza in the uncanny valley: anthropomorphizing consumer robots increases their perceived warmth but decreases liking
    Kim, Seo Young
    Schmitt, Bernd H.
    Thalmann, Nadia M.
    [J]. MARKETING LETTERS, 2019, 30 (01) : 1 - 12