A systematic literature review on risk perception of Artificial Narrow Intelligence

被引:1
作者
Krieger, Jonas Benjamin [1 ,6 ]
Bouder, Frederic [2 ]
Wibral, Matthias [3 ]
Almeida, Rui Jorge [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] United Nations Univ UNU MERIT, Sch Business & Econ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Stavanger, Dept Safety Econ & Planning, Stavanger, Norway
[3] Univ Maastricht, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Microecon & Publ Econ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Maastricht, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Data Analyt & Digitalisat, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Maastricht, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Quantitat Econometr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht Econ & Social Res Inst Innovat & Techno, unu MeriT, Boschstr 24, NL-6211 AX Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Risk Perception; Risk; Artificial Intelligence; AI; Artificial Narrow Intelligence; ANI; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; PERCEIVED RISK; TRUST; ANTHROPOMORPHISM; ACCEPTANCE; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; SERVICES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1080/13669877.2024.2350725
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has captured global attention recently, prompting the need to understand how associated risks are perceived. This paper attempts to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of the topic, focusing especially on the most problematic area of Artificial Narrow Intelligence. Utilising a systematic literature review, we examined 64 studies focusing on both statistical and qualitative aspects of AI risk perceptions. This research shows that current publications focus on Asia and North America, with the number of publications increasing significantly over the last three years. Research focuses primarily on three domains: Health, consumer behaviour and finance. This study has identified key factors that influence AI risk perceptions, including familiarity, trust and privacy, while also recognising confounding variables such as gender and political orientation. Still, one crucial shortcoming in existing literature emerges: While numerous studies examine how AI risk perceptions are conceived, there is a lack of systematic research on the formation of these perceptions.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 130 条
  • [1] Psychological barriers to Internet usage among older adults in the UK
    Adams, N
    Stubbs, D
    Woods, V
    [J]. MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND THE INTERNET IN MEDICINE, 2005, 30 (01): : 3 - 17
  • [2] Al-Gasawneh J., 2022, Uncertain Supply Chain Management, V10, P1427, DOI DOI 10.5267/J.USCM.2022
  • [3] Al-Gasawneh J., 2022, International Journal of Data and Network Science, V6, P743, DOI DOI 10.5267/J.IJDNS.2022.3.007
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1978, An introduction to artificial intelligence: Can computers think? San Francisco
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1998, Computational intelligence: a logical approach, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICT.2016.7500442
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2019, Exec. Order No. 13859-Maintaining American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2021, National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020
  • [8] In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence
    Araujo, Theo
    Helberger, Natali
    Kruikemeier, Sanne
    de Vreese, Claes H.
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 (03) : 611 - 623
  • [9] Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
  • [10] Okay Google, Good to Talk to You ... Examining the Determinants Affecting Users' Behavioral Intention for Adopting Voice Assistants: Does Technology Self-Efficacy Matter?
    Ashrafi, Dewan Mehrab
    Easmin, Rubina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2023, 20 (02)