Transrectal povidone-iodine efficiency in reducing infections occurring after transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate

被引:1
|
作者
Siyez, Ender [1 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Demokrasi Univ, Dept Urol, Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training & Res Hosp, TR-9035150 Buca Izmir, Turkey
关键词
antibiotic prophylaxis; povidone-iodine; prostate; transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; LOCAL TREATMENT; COMPLICATIONS; TRANSPERINEAL; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; DECREASE; SEPSIS; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000027539
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The present study aimed to compare infectious complications in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) with and without povidone-iodine transrectal injection using a gavage syringe. The records of 112 patients, who underwent TRUS-Bx between January 2016 and December 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. The biopsy indication was considered high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and/or suspicious digital rectal prostate examination findings. Patients' ages, underlying diseases, PSA levels, prostate volumes, pathologic results, and infectious complications after the biopsy were investigated. All the patients received 1500 mg of ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice a day) for 5 days, starting from the day before the procedure. Forty-seven (41.96%) patients received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis with povidone-iodine transrectal injection, while 65 (58.03%) only received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. All the patients, who were readmitted to the hospital after the procedure, especially with a temperature of higher than 37.8 degrees C, were detected. For the purposes of the study, the priority was placed on the emergence of the rate of febrile infectious complications. Differences in febrile infectious complications in patients, who received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis with transrectal povidone-iodine, and those, who received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis alone before TRUS-Bx, were studied. Febrile infectious complications developed in 10 cases (15.38%) in patients, who received ciprofloxacin antibiotics prophylaxis alone. In the povidone-iodine rectal disinfection group, there was only 1 case of febrile infectious complication (2%). There was no significant difference by clinicopathologic features, age, PSA level, and cancer detection rate between both groups (P > .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at a significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. There was no significant side effect associated with povidone iodine. In addition to the use of prophylactic antibiotics, transrectal povidone-iodine was useful in reducing the febrile infection complications following TRUS-Bx.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A rare rhabdomyolysis appears after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
    Zhong, Wanmei
    Cen, Junjie
    Chen, Yu
    Chen, Wei
    Luo, Junhang
    Chen, Xu
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 8 (01) : 137 - 139
  • [22] Ciprofloxacin resistance in the faecal carriage of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
    Taylor, Stephen
    Margolick, Joseph
    Abughosh, Zeid
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    Lange, Dirk
    Bowie, William R.
    Bell, Robert
    Roscoe, Diane
    Machan, Lindsay
    Black, Peter
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (06) : 946 - 953
  • [23] The future perspectives in transrectal prostate ultrasound guided biopsy
    Hwang, Sung Il
    Lee, Hak Jong
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2 (04) : 153 - 160
  • [24] Antibiotic prophylaxis in ultrasound guided transrectal prostate biopsy
    Sieber, PR
    Rommel, FM
    Agusta, VE
    Breslin, JA
    Huffnagle, HW
    Harpster, LE
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (06) : 2199 - 2200
  • [25] Povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy are associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications
    Ryu, Ji Won
    Jung, Seung Il
    Ahn, Ji Hoon
    Hwang, Eu Chang
    Yu, Ho Song
    Kang, Taek Won
    Kwon, Dong Deuk
    Park, Kwangsung
    Kim, Jin Woong
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 48 (11) : 1763 - 1770
  • [26] SYSTEMATIC TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY AFTER NEGATIVE DIGITALLY DIRECTED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    LIPPMAN, HR
    GHIATAS, AA
    SAROSDY, MF
    STAMEY, TA
    RESNICK, MI
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) : 827 - 829
  • [27] Ertapenem prophylaxis reduces sepsis after transrectal biopsy of the prostate
    Losco, Giovanni
    Studd, Rod
    Blackmore, Timothy
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 : 69 - 72
  • [28] Ciprofloxacin: single versus multiple doses in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
    Rafiq, Muhammad
    Farag, Fawzy
    Manley, Kate
    Ho, Edwin
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 73 (01) : 91 - 93
  • [29] Infective complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy following a new protocol for antibiotic prophylaxis aimed at reducing hospital-acquired infections
    Madden, Thomas
    Doble, Andrew
    Aliyu, Sani H.
    Neal, David E.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (10) : 1597 - 1602
  • [30] Transrectal ultrasound and biopsy of the prostate
    Lemaître, L
    Villers, A
    Mouton, D
    Puech, P
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2006, 87 (02): : 201 - 209