Transrectal povidone-iodine efficiency in reducing infections occurring after transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate

被引:1
|
作者
Siyez, Ender [1 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Demokrasi Univ, Dept Urol, Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training & Res Hosp, TR-9035150 Buca Izmir, Turkey
关键词
antibiotic prophylaxis; povidone-iodine; prostate; transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; LOCAL TREATMENT; COMPLICATIONS; TRANSPERINEAL; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; DECREASE; SEPSIS; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000027539
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The present study aimed to compare infectious complications in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) with and without povidone-iodine transrectal injection using a gavage syringe. The records of 112 patients, who underwent TRUS-Bx between January 2016 and December 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. The biopsy indication was considered high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and/or suspicious digital rectal prostate examination findings. Patients' ages, underlying diseases, PSA levels, prostate volumes, pathologic results, and infectious complications after the biopsy were investigated. All the patients received 1500 mg of ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice a day) for 5 days, starting from the day before the procedure. Forty-seven (41.96%) patients received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis with povidone-iodine transrectal injection, while 65 (58.03%) only received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. All the patients, who were readmitted to the hospital after the procedure, especially with a temperature of higher than 37.8 degrees C, were detected. For the purposes of the study, the priority was placed on the emergence of the rate of febrile infectious complications. Differences in febrile infectious complications in patients, who received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis with transrectal povidone-iodine, and those, who received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis alone before TRUS-Bx, were studied. Febrile infectious complications developed in 10 cases (15.38%) in patients, who received ciprofloxacin antibiotics prophylaxis alone. In the povidone-iodine rectal disinfection group, there was only 1 case of febrile infectious complication (2%). There was no significant difference by clinicopathologic features, age, PSA level, and cancer detection rate between both groups (P > .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at a significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. There was no significant side effect associated with povidone iodine. In addition to the use of prophylactic antibiotics, transrectal povidone-iodine was useful in reducing the febrile infection complications following TRUS-Bx.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prevention of infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: comparison of povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, and formalin disinfection
    Basaranoglu, Mert
    Nebioglu, Ali
    Bozlu, Murat
    Gokce, Ali
    Akbay, Erdem
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025, 43 (01)
  • [2] A Prospective Randomized Trial of Povidone-Iodine Prophylactic Cleansing of the Rectum Before Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    AbuGhosh, Zeid
    Margolick, Joseph
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    Taylor, Stephen A.
    Afshar, Kourosh
    Bell, Robert
    Lange, Dirk
    Bowie, William R.
    Roscoe, Diane
    Machan, Lindsay
    Black, Peter C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04) : 1326 - 1331
  • [3] Decrease in Infection Rate Following Use of Povidone-Iodine During Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy of the Prostate: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Ghafoori, Mahyar
    Shakiba, Madjid
    Seifmanesh, Hamidreza
    Hoseini, Kamal
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 9 (02) : 67 - 70
  • [4] Does Washing the Biopsy Needle with Povidone-Iodine Have an Effect on Infection Rates after Transrectal Prostate Needle Biopsy?
    Koc, Gokhan
    Un, Sitki
    Filiz, Devrim Nihat
    Akbay, Kaan
    Yilmaz, Yuksel
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 85 (02) : 147 - 151
  • [5] Reducing the risk of infection for transrectal prostate biopsy with povidone-iodine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pu, Chunxiao
    Bai, Yunjin
    Yuan, Haichao
    Li, Jinhong
    Tang, Yin
    Wang, Jia
    Wei, Qiang
    Han, Ping
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 46 (09) : 1691 - 1698
  • [6] A prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine suppository before transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy
    Ryu, Hoyoung
    Song, Sang Hun
    Lee, Sang Eun
    Song, Kyoung-Ho
    Lee, Sangchul
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (12)
  • [7] Effect of intrarectal povidone-iodine in the incidence of infectious complications after transrectal prostatic biopsy
    Gil-Vernet Sedo, Jose Maria
    Alvarez-Vijande Garcia, Ricardo
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2012, 65 (04): : 463 - 466
  • [8] Effectiveness of Intrarectal Povidone-iodine Cleansing Plus Formalin Disinfection of the Needle Tip in Decreasing Infectious Complications After Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Pontes-Junior, Jose
    Freire, Tiago Magalhaes
    Pugliesi, Felipe Guimaraes
    Costa, Felipe Machado de Moura
    De Souza, Vinicius Meneguette Gomes
    Galucci, Fabio Pescarmona
    Albertini, Aline
    Couto, Adriano Borba
    Murta, Claudio Bovolenta
    Guglielmetti, Giuliano Betoni
    Nahas, William C.
    Junior, Adalberto Andriolo
    Neto, Alcides Mosconi
    Claro, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 208 (06) : 1194 - 1202
  • [9] Nationwide Population Based Study of Infections after Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Lundstrom, Karl-Johan
    Drevin, Linda
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Garmo, Hans
    Loeb, Stacy
    Stattin, Par
    Bill-Axelson, Anna
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (04) : 1116 - 1122
  • [10] Variability of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy prophylactic measures
    Hillelsohn, Joel H.
    Duty, Brian
    Blute, Michael L., Jr.
    Okhunov, Zhamshid
    Kashan, Mahyar
    Moldwin, Robert
    Ashley, Richard N.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (06) : 6573 - 6577