Deep learning image segmentation approaches for malignant bone lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Rich, Joseph M. [1 ]
Bhardwaj, Lokesh N. [1 ]
Shah, Aman [2 ]
Gangal, Krish [3 ]
Rapaka, Mohitha S. [4 ]
Oberai, Assad A. [5 ,6 ]
Fields, Brandon K. K. [7 ]
Matcuk Jr, George R. [8 ]
Duddalwar, Vinay A. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Appl Biostat & Epidemiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Irvington High Sch, Bridge UnderGrad Sci Summer Res Program, Fremont, CA USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Biol, Austin, TX USA
[5] Univ Southern Calif, Viterbi Sch Engn, Dept Aerosp, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Univ Southern Calif, Viterbi Sch Engn, Mech Engn Dept, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[9] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[10] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Radiol, USC Radi Lab, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY | 2023年 / 3卷
关键词
bone cancer; CT; deep learning; image segmentation; MRI; PET/CT; OSTEOSARCOMA SEGMENTATION; NEURAL-NETWORK; CT; CLASSIFICATION; RADIOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/fradi.2023.1241651
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction Image segmentation is an important process for quantifying characteristics of malignant bone lesions, but this task is challenging and laborious for radiologists. Deep learning has shown promise in automating image segmentation in radiology, including for malignant bone lesions. The purpose of this review is to investigate deep learning-based image segmentation methods for malignant bone lesions on Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and Positron-Emission Tomography/CT (PET/CT).Method The literature search of deep learning-based image segmentation of malignant bony lesions on CT and MRI was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases following the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A total of 41 original articles published between February 2017 and March 2023 were included in the review.Results The majority of papers studied MRI, followed by CT, PET/CT, and PET/MRI. There was relatively even distribution of papers studying primary vs. secondary malignancies, as well as utilizing 3-dimensional vs. 2-dimensional data. Many papers utilize custom built models as a modification or variation of U-Net. The most common metric for evaluation was the dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Most models achieved a DSC above 0.6, with medians for all imaging modalities between 0.85-0.9.Discussion Deep learning methods show promising ability to segment malignant osseous lesions on CT, MRI, and PET/CT. Some strategies which are commonly applied to help improve performance include data augmentation, utilization of large public datasets, preprocessing including denoising and cropping, and U-Net architecture modification. Future directions include overcoming dataset and annotation homogeneity and generalizing for clinical applicability.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A review of deep learning approaches for multimodal image segmentation of liver cancer
    Wu, Chaopeng
    Chen, Qiyao
    Wang, Haoyu
    Guan, Yu
    Mian, Zhangyang
    Huang, Cong
    Ruan, Changli
    Song, Qibin
    Jiang, Hao
    Pan, Jinghui
    Li, Xiangpan
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024,
  • [32] A review of deep learning and Generative Adversarial Networks applications in medical image analysis
    Sindhura, D. N.
    Pai, Radhika M.
    Bhat, Shyamasunder N.
    Pai, Manohara M. M.
    MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS, 2024, 30 (03)
  • [33] Deep-learning models for image-based gynecological cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta- analysis
    Taddese, Asefa Adimasu
    Tilahun, Binyam Chakilu
    Awoke, Tadesse
    Atnafu, Asmamaw
    Mamuye, Adane
    Mengiste, Shegaw Anagaw
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 13
  • [34] A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial neural network, machine learning, deep learning, and ensemble learning approaches in field of geotechnical engineering
    Yaghoubi E.
    Yaghoubi E.
    Khamees A.
    Vakili A.H.
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2024, 36 (21) : 12655 - 12699
  • [35] Deep-learning CT reconstruction in clinical scans of the abdomen: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mostafa A. Shehata
    Abdelrahman M. Saad
    Serageldin Kamel
    Nir Stanietzky
    Alicia M. Roman-Colon
    Ajaykumar C. Morani
    Khaled M. Elsayes
    Corey T. Jensen
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 2724 - 2756
  • [36] Deep learning versus ophthalmologists for screening for glaucoma on fundus examination: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buisson, Mathieu
    Navel, Valentin
    Labbe, Antoine
    Watson, Stephanie L.
    Baker, Julien S.
    Murtagh, Patrick
    Chiambaretta, Frederic
    Dutheil, Frederic
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 49 (09) : 1027 - 1038
  • [37] A review of deep learning approaches in clinical and healthcare systems based on medical image analysis
    Helaly, Hadeer A.
    Badawy, Mahmoud
    Haikal, Amira Y.
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 83 (12) : 36039 - 36080
  • [38] Bone age assessment with various machine learning techniques: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Dallora, Ana Luiza
    Anderberg, Peter
    Kvist, Ola
    Mendes, Emilia
    Ruiz, Sandra Diaz
    Berglund, Johan Sanmartin
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (07):
  • [39] Deep learning for acute rib fracture detection in CT data: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lopez-Melia, Manel
    Magnin, Virginie
    Marchand-Maillet, Stephane
    Grabherr, Silke
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 97 (1155) : 535 - 543
  • [40] Deep Learning Models Used in the Diagnostic Workup of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis
    Bodmer, Nicolas S.
    Christensen, Dylan G.
    Bachmann, Lucas M.
    Faes, Livia
    Sanak, Frantisek
    Iselin, Katja
    Kaufmann, Claude
    Thiel, Michael A.
    Baenninger, Philipp B.
    CORNEA, 2024, 43 (07) : 916 - 931