Forests for Health Promotion: Future Developments of Salutogenic Properties in Managed Boreal Forests

被引:0
|
作者
Stoltz, Jonathan [1 ]
Burgas, Daniel [2 ,3 ]
Potterf, Maria [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Duflot, Remi [2 ,3 ]
Eyvindson, Kyle [5 ]
Probst, Birgit M. [6 ,7 ]
Torano-Caicoya, Astor [8 ]
Monkkonen, Mikko [2 ,3 ]
Gyllin, Mats [1 ]
Grahn, Patrik [1 ]
Snall, Tord [9 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept People & Soc, POB 190, S-23422 Lomma, Sweden
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, POB 35, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland
[3] Univ Jyvaskyla, Sch Resource Wisdom, POB 35, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Life Sci Syst, Hans Carl Von Carlowitz Pl 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[5] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Environm Sci & Nat Resource Management, POB 5003 NMBU, N-1433 As, Norway
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Forest & Environm Policy, TUM Sch Management, Hans Carl Von Carlowitz Pl 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[7] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Life Sci, Dept Life Sci Syst, Urban Prod Ecosyst, Hans Carl Von Carlowitz Pl 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[8] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Forest Growth & Yield Sci, Sch Life Sci Weihenstephan, Hans Carl Von Carlowitz Pl 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[9] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, SLU Swedish Species Informat Ctr, Box 7007, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
FORESTS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 06期
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
forest planning; perceived sensory dimensions; health; well-being; psychological restoration; cultural ecosystem services; recreation; PREFERENCES; QUALITIES; REHABILITATION; CHOICE;
D O I
10.3390/f15060969
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Visits to forests can improve human health and well-being through various mechanisms. They can support the immune system, promote physical activity, and restore stress and attention fatigue. Questions remain about how perceived qualities in forests important to support such salutogenic, i.e., health-promoting, benefits can be represented in forest simulation tools to allow quantitative analyses, e.g., long-term projections or trade-off analyses with other forest functions, such as biodiversity conservation, wood production, etc. Questions also remain about how different forest management regimes might impact such perceived qualities in forests. Here, we defined three types of salutogenic forest characteristics (SFCs), referred to as Deep, Spacious, and Mixed forest characteristics, respectively. We did so by using the perceived sensory dimension (PSD) model, which describes and interrelates more fundamental perceived qualities of recreational outdoor environments that are important to support people's health and well-being. We identified proxy variables for the selected PSD models in boreal forest stands and compared the effect of five different management regimes on both individual PSD models and the derived SFCs when projecting a forest landscape 100 years into the future. Our results suggest combinations of protection (set-aside) and variations of continuous cover forestry as the most promising strategies to achieve these salutogenic properties in the long-term future. Depending on the SFC in focus and the specific management regime used, between 20% and 50% of the landscape could support associated properties in the long term (100 years). This might impact how forests should be managed when salutogenic outcomes are considered alongside, e.g., wood production and other forest contributions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The use of diversity indices to assess the diversity of vegetation in managed boreal forests
    Pitkänen, S
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 112 (1-2) : 121 - 137
  • [22] Past and future of wildfires in Northern Hemisphere's boreal forests
    Velasco Hererra, Victor M.
    Soon, Willie
    Perez-Moreno, Cesar
    Herrera, Graciela Velasco
    Martell-Dubois, Raul
    Rosique-de la Cruz, Laura
    Fedorov, Valery M.
    Cerdeira-Estrada, Sergio
    Bongelli, Eric
    Zuniga, Emmanuel
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 504
  • [23] Past and future of wildfires in Northern Hemisphere's boreal forests
    Velasco Hererra, Victor M.
    Soon, Willie
    Pérez-Moreno, César
    Velasco Herrera, Graciela
    Martell-Dubois, Raúl
    Rosique-de la Cruz, Laura
    Fedorov, Valery M.
    Cerdeira-Estrada, Sergio
    Bongelli, Eric
    Zúñiga, Emmanuel
    Forest Ecology and Management, 2022, 504
  • [24] Leaving dead wood for insects in boreal forests -: Suggestions for the future
    Ehnström, B
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2001, : 91 - 98
  • [25] Empirical models of albedo transitions in managed boreal forests: analysis of performance and transportability
    Bright, Ryan M.
    Anton-Fernandez, Clara
    Astrup, Rasmus
    Stromman, Anders H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2015, 45 (02) : 195 - 206
  • [26] Sensitivity of managed boreal forests in Finland to climate change, with implications for adaptive management
    Kellomaki, Seppo
    Peltola, Heli
    Nuutinen, Tuula
    Korhonen, Kari T.
    Strandman, Harri
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 363 (1501) : 2341 - 2351
  • [27] The Conservation Potential of Brook-side Key Habitats in Managed Boreal Forests
    Selonen, Ville A. O.
    Mussaari, Maija
    Toivanen, Tero
    Kotiaho, Janne S.
    SILVA FENNICA, 2011, 45 (05) : 1041 - 1052
  • [28] Spatial pattern in the occurrence of the lichen Lobaria pulmonaria in managed and virgin boreal forests
    Gu, WD
    Kuusinen, M
    Konttinen, T
    Hanski, I
    ECOGRAPHY, 2001, 24 (02) : 139 - 150
  • [29] Hygroscopic and CCN properties of aerosol particles in boreal forests
    Hämeri, K
    Väkevä, M
    Aalto, PP
    Kulmala, M
    Swietlicki, E
    Zhou, J
    Seidl, W
    Becker, E
    O'Dowd, CD
    TELLUS SERIES B-CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL METEOROLOGY, 2001, 53 (04): : 359 - 379
  • [30] Net climate impacts of forest biomass production and utilization in managed boreal forests
    Kilpelainen, Antti
    Torssonen, Piritta
    Strandman, Harri
    Kellomaki, Seppo
    Asikainen, Antti
    Peltola, Heli
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (02): : 307 - 316