Farmers' evolving attitudes on environmental conditionality in the CAP: a farm level examination of temporal shifts

被引:1
作者
Mccormack, Michele [1 ]
Buckley, Cathal [2 ]
Lynch, Bridget [3 ]
机构
[1] Teagasc, Agr Catchments Programme, Mellows Campus, Athenry H65 R718, Co Galway, Ireland
[2] Teagasc, Agr Econ & Natl Farm Survey Dept, Athenry, Co Galway, Ireland
[3] Teagasc, Agr Catchments Programme, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Ireland
关键词
Cross compliance; Common agricultural policy; Command and control; CROSS-COMPLIANCE; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; MOTIVATION; BEHAVIOR; ADOPTION; SCHEMES;
D O I
10.1007/s13412-024-00941-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Given the anticipated shift in the allocation of resources under the common agricultural policy (CAP) toward increasing positive environmental outcomes, this study explores farmer attitudes toward the current principle of connecting direct payments to environmental conditionality, known as cross compliance. Furthermore, we explore whether there have been changes in farmer attitudes toward cross compliance over time by posing identical questions to farmers in both 2010 and 2018. A supplementary survey was designed and administered in conjunction with the core EU Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) to assess farmers' attitudes to linking CAP payments to environmental conditionality. The findings of a generalized ordered logit model indicate a high level of support among farmers for linking direct payments to good agricultural practices and cross compliance standards. Factors influencing farmers' acceptance of cross compliance can be categorized into several domains, including farm and farmer characteristics, social and institutional attributes, and economic factors. Notably, the level of subsidy dependency emerges as a highly significant factor, with farmers who rely more heavily on direct payments being more inclined to disagree with cross compliance requirements.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], Off J Eur Union L, V328, P27
  • [2] Bareli MG, 2020, Research Handbook on the politics of EU Law
  • [3] Do differential payments for agri-environment schemes affect the environmental benefits? A case study in the North-Eastern Italy
    Bartolini, Fabio
    Vergamini, Daniele
    Longhitano, Davide
    Povellato, Andrea
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 107
  • [4] Modelling the Linkages between Cross-Compliance and Agri-Environmental Schemes Under Asymmetric Information
    Bartolini, Fabio
    Gallerani, Vittorio
    Raggi, Meri
    Viaggi, Davide
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 63 (02) : 310 - 330
  • [5] Explaining farmers' conservation behaviour: Why do farmers behave the way they do?
    Beedell, JDC
    Rehman, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1999, 57 (03) : 165 - 176
  • [6] Strengths and Weaknesses of Cross-compliance in the CAP
    Bennett, Harriet
    Osterburg, Bernhard
    Nitsch, Heike
    Kristensen, Lone
    Primdahl, Jorgen
    Verschuur, Gerwin
    [J]. EUROCHOICES, 2006, 5 (02) : 50 - 57
  • [7] Implementation of the EU Nitrates Directive in the Republic of Ireland - A view from the farm
    Buckley, Cathal
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 78 : 29 - 36
  • [8] Technology heterogeneity and policy change in farm-level efficiency analysis: an application to the Irish beef sector
    Cillero, Maria Martinez
    Thorne, Fiona
    Wallace, Michael
    Breen, James
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 46 (02) : 193 - 214
  • [9] Darren Sinclair., 1997, LAW POL, V19, P529, DOI [DOI 10.1111/1467-9930.00037, 10.1111/1467-9930.00037]
  • [10] Farmers' preferences for new environmental policy instruments: Determining the acceptability of cross compliance for biodiversity benefits
    Davies, Ben B.
    Hodge, Ian D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (03) : 393 - 414