Optimal minimum MU for intensity-modulated proton therapy with pencil-beam scanning proton beams

被引:2
作者
Yi, Byongyong [1 ,2 ]
Mossahebi, Sina [1 ,2 ]
Jatczak, Jenna [2 ]
Mundis, Michelle [2 ]
Houser, Thomas [2 ]
Alicia, David [2 ]
Han, Dong [3 ]
Gonzalez, Rosette [2 ]
Olis, Stephen [2 ]
Zakhary, Mark [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Maryland Proton Treatment Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] New York Proton Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
intensity-modulated proton therapy; minimum monitor unit; proton pencil-beam scanning; treatment time; MONITOR UNIT CONSTRAINTS; PLAN; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14435
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: A higher minimum monitor unit (minMU) for pencil-beam scanning proton beams in intensity-modulated proton therapy is preferred for more efficient delivery. However, plan quality may be compromised when the minMU is too large. This study aimed to identify the optimal minMU (OminMU) to improve plan delivery efficiency while maintaining high plan quality. Purpose: A higher minimum monitor unit (minMU) for pencil-beam scanning proton beams in intensity-modulated proton therapy is preferred for more efficient delivery. However, plan quality may be compromised when the minMU is too large. This study aimed to identify the optimal minMU (OminMU) to improve plan delivery efficiency while maintaining high plan quality. Methods: We utilized clinical plans including six anatomic sites (brain, head and neck, breast, lung, abdomen, and prostate) from 23 patients previously treated with the Varian ProBeam system. The minMU of each plan was increased from the current clinical minMU of 1.1 to 3-24 MU depending on the daily prescribed dose (DPD). The dosimetric parameters of the plans were evaluated for consistency against a 1.1-minMU plan for target coverage as well as organs-at-risk dose sparing. DPD/minMU was defined as the ratio of DPD to minMU (cGy/MU) to find the OminMU by ensuring that dosimetric parameters did not differ by >1% compared to those of the 1.1-minMU plan. Results: All plans up to 5 minMU showed no significant dose differences compared to the 1.1-minMU plan. Plan qualities remained acceptable when DPD/minMU >= 35 cGy/MU. This suggests that the 35 cGy/MU criterion can be used as the OminMU, which implies that 5 MU is the OminMU for a conventional fraction dose of 180 cGy. Treatment times were decreased by an average of 32% (max 56%, min 7%) and by an average of 1.6 min when the minMU was increased from 1.1 to OminMU. Conclusion: A clinical guideline for OminMU has been established. The minMU can be increased by 1 MU for every 35 cGy of DPD without compromising plan quality for most cases analyzed in this study. Significant treatment time reduction of up to 56% was observed when the suggested OminMU is used.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Selecting Optimal Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Plan Parameters to Reduce Dose Discrepancy between Discrete Spot Plan and Continuous Scanning: A Proof-of-Concept Study [J].
Liang, Xiaoying ;
Beltran, Chris J. ;
Liu, Chunbo ;
Park, Chunjoo ;
Lu, Bo ;
Yaddanapudi, Sridhar ;
Tan, Jun ;
Furutani, Keith M. .
CANCERS, 2023, 15 (16)
[12]   A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system [J].
Lin, Liyong ;
Huang, Sheng ;
Kang, Minglei ;
Hiltunen, Petri ;
Vanderstraeten, Reynald ;
Lindberg, Jari ;
Siljamaki, Sami ;
Wareing, Todd ;
Davis, Ian ;
Barnett, Allen ;
McGhee, John ;
Simone, Charles B., II ;
Solberg, Timothy D. ;
McDonough, James E. ;
Ainsley, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (02) :44-49
[13]   Minimum-MU and sparse-energy-layer (MMSEL) constrained inverse optimization method for efficiently deliverable PBS plans [J].
Lin, Yuting ;
Clasie, Benjamin ;
Liu, Tian ;
McDonald, Mark ;
Langen, Katja M. ;
Gao, Hao .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (20)
[14]   A Greedy reassignment algorithm for the PBS minimum monitor unit constraint [J].
Lin, Yuting ;
Kooy, Hanne ;
Craft, David ;
Depauw, Nicolas ;
Flanz, Jacob ;
Clasie, Benjamin .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (12) :4665-4678
[15]   An Integrated Physical Optimization Framework for Proton Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy FLASH Treatment Planning Allows Dose, Dose Rate, and Linear Energy Transfer Optimization Using Patient-Specific Ridge Filters [J].
Liu R. ;
Charyyev S. ;
Wahl N. ;
Liu W. ;
Kang M. ;
Zhou J. ;
Yang X. ;
Baltazar F. ;
Palkowitsch M. ;
Higgins K. ;
Dynan W. ;
Bradley J. ;
Lin L. .
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 2023, 116 (04) :949-959
[16]   Efficient Interplay Effect Mitigation for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning by Spot-Adapted Layered Repainting Evenly Spread out Over the Full Breathing Cycle [J].
Poulsen, Per Rugaard ;
Eley, John ;
Langner, Ulrich ;
Simone, Charles B., II ;
Langen, Katja .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 100 (01) :226-234
[17]   Plan quality effects of maximum monitor unit constraints in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for central nervous system and skull base tumors [J].
Rao, Avani Dholakia ;
Sun, Kai ;
Zhu, Mingyao ;
Mossahebi, Sina ;
Sabouri, Pouya ;
Houser, Thomas ;
Jatczak, Jenna ;
Zakhary, Mark ;
Regine, William F. ;
Miller, Robert C. ;
Bentzen, Soren ;
Mishra, Mark, V .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 160 :18-24
[18]  
RaySearch LaboratoriesLaboratorie, 2021, RAYSTATION 11B RAYPH
[19]   Robust optimization in IMPT using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum MU constraint [J].
Shan, Jie ;
An, Yu ;
Bues, Martin ;
Schild, Steven E. ;
Liu, Wei .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (01) :460-469
[20]   Technical Note: Using experimentally determined proton spot scanning timing parameters to accurately model beam delivery time [J].
Shen, Jiajian ;
Tryggestad, Erik ;
Younkin, James E. ;
Keole, Sameer R. ;
Furutani, Keith M. ;
Kang, Yixiu ;
Herman, Michael G. ;
Bues, Martin .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (10) :5081-5088