Clinical-Prostate cancer Variation in management of lymph node positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy within a statewide quality improvement consortium

被引:0
作者
Triner, Daniel [1 ]
Daignault-Newton, Stephanie [1 ]
Singhal, Udit [1 ,2 ]
Sessine, Michael [3 ]
Dess, Robert T. [4 ]
Caram, Megan E., V [5 ]
Borza, Tudor [1 ]
Ginsburg, Kevin B. [3 ]
Lane, Brian R. [6 ]
Morgan, Todd M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Michigan Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Michigan Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Corewell Hlth, Div Urol, Grand Rapids, MI USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Lymph node metastases; Adjuvant therapy; Pelvic lymph node dissection; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; OUTCOMES; METASTASIS; DISSECTION; RECURRENCE; IMMEDIATE; PATTERNS; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.03.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Patients with lymph node positive (pN+) disease found at the time of radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer (CaP) are at high risk of disease persistence and progression. Contemporary management trends of pN+ CaP are not well described. Materials and methods: Patients in the Michigan Urologic Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2012 and 2023 with cN0/pN+ disease were identified. The primary outcome was to evaluate patient and practice -level factors associated with time to secondary post -RP treatment. Secondary outcomes included practicelevel variation in management of pN+ CaP and rates of secondary treatment modality. To assess factors associated with secondary treatment, a Cox proportional hazards model of a 60 -day landmark analysis was performed. Results: We identified 666 patients with pN+ disease. Overall, 66% underwent secondary treatment within 12 months post -RP. About 19% of patients with detectable post -RP PSA did not receive treatment. Of patients receiving secondary treatment after 60 -days post -RP, 34% received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, 27% received radiation (RT) alone, 36% received combination, and 4% received other systemic therapies. In the multivariable model, pathologic grade group (GG)3 (HR 1.5; 95%CI: 1.05 - 2.14), GG4-5 (HR 1.65; 95%CI: 1.16 - 2.34), positive margins (HR 1.46; 95%CI: 1.13 - 1.88), and detectable postoperative PSA >= 0.1 ng/ml (HR 3.46; 95%CI: 2.61 - 4.59) were significantly associated with secondary post -RP treatment. There was wide variation in adjusted practice -level 12 -month secondary treatment utilization (28% - 79%). Conclusions: The majority pN+ patients receive treatment within 12 months post -RP which was associated with high -risk pathological features and post -RP PSA. Variation in management of pN+ disease highlights the uncertainty regarding the optimal management. Understanding which patients will benefit from secondary treatment, and which type, will be critical to minimize variation in care. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:220e1 / 220e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [11] Association between Lymph Node Counts and Oncological Outcomes in Lymph Node Positive Prostate Cancer
    Mandel, Philipp
    Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
    Bogdan, Katharina
    Boehm, Katharina
    Budaeus, Lars
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Tilki, Derya
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2017, 3 (2-3): : 248 - 255
  • [12] Management of Patients with Node-positive Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review
    Marra, Giancarlo
    Valerio, Massimo
    Heidegger, Isabel
    Tsaur, Igor
    Mathieu, Romain
    Ceci, Francesco
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Kretschmer, Alexander
    Thibault, Constance
    Ost, Piet
    Tilki, Derya
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Moschini, Marco
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Gontero, Paolo
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (05): : 565 - 581
  • [13] Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy
    Messing, Edward M.
    Manola, Judith
    Yao, Jorge
    Kiernan, Maureen
    Crawford, David
    Wilding, George
    di'SantAgnese, P. Anthony
    Trump, Donald
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2006, 7 (06) : 472 - 479
  • [14] Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer
    Messing, EM
    Manola, J
    Sarosdy, M
    Wilding, G
    Crawford, ED
    Trump, D
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (24) : 1781 - 1788
  • [15] Risk Stratification of pN plus Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy from a Large Single Institutional Series with Long-Term Followup
    Moschini, Marco
    Sharma, Vidit
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Frank, Igor
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Tollefson, Matthew K.
    Kwon, Eugene D.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (06) : 1773 - 1778
  • [16] Natural History of Clinical Recurrence Patterns of Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
    Moschini, Marco
    Sharma, Vidit
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Quevedo, J. Fernando
    Davis, Brian J.
    Kwona, Eugene
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 135 - 142
  • [17] Clinical-Prostate cancer Oncologic outcomes of patients with lymph node invasion at prostatectomy and post-prostatectomy biochemical persistence
    Perera, Marlon
    Lebdai, Souhil
    Tin, Amy L.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Benfante, Nicole
    Beech, Benjamin B.
    Alvim, Ricardo G.
    Touijer, Adam S.
    Jenjitranant, Pocharapong
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Laudone, Vincent P.
    Eastham, James A.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Touijer, Karim A.
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 41 (02) : 105.e19 - 105.e23
  • [18] Survival Outcomes of Men with Lymph Node-positive Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Different Postoperative Management Strategies
    Touijer, Karim A.
    Karnes, Robert Jeffery
    Passoni, Niccolo
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Assel, Melissa
    Fossati, Nicola
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Eastham, James A.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Vickers, Andrew
    Cozzarini, Cesare
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (06) : 890 - 896
  • [19] Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Lymph Node Metastasis Treated with Radical Prostatectomy Without Adjuvant Androgen-deprivation Therapy
    Touijer, Karim A.
    Mazzola, Clarisse R.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [20] Role of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Node-Positive Prostate Cancer
    Wong, Yu-Ning
    Freedland, Stephen
    Egleston, Brian
    Hudes, Gary
    Schwartz, J. Sanford
    Armstrong, Katrina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (01) : 100 - 105