Maximum consensus model with individual tolerance and mixed DEA prospect cross-efficiency for multi-attribute group decision-making

被引:3
|
作者
Chen, Huayou [1 ]
Shao, Longlong [1 ]
Zhou, Ligang [2 ]
Liu, Jinpei [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ, Sch Big Data & Stat, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ, Sch Math Sci, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Univ, Sch Business, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
[4] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi -attribute group decision -making; Individual tolerance; Consensus reaching process; DEA cross -efficiency; Prospect theory; Selection process; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; MINIMUM ADJUSTMENT; SOCIAL NETWORK; COST; INFORMATION; MAGDM;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111572
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Experts are mostly not completely rational, and they generally exhibit different psychological attitudes and behaviors in multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM), which may lead to actual decisions deviating from the results obtained by traditional objective methods. Therefore, it is reasonable and necessary to capture individual tolerance and risk attitudes of experts when dealing with MAGDM problems. To achieve this intention, we design a MAGDM method that combines the maximum consensus model with individual tolerance and mixed DEA prospect cross-efficiency. In the consensus reaching process (CRP), we devise a maximum consensus model with individual tolerance, which can achieve a high consensus level with limited expert tolerance. In the selection process, we first define the prospect aggressive and benevolent cross-efficiency functions. Then, a mixed DEA prospect cross-efficiency ranking method is proposed, which reflects the attitudes of DMs (decision-makers) towards losses and gains. Moreover, this method avoids DMs' hesitation and trouble in choosing between aggressive and benevolent DEA models. Subsequently, the algorithm and framework for the MAGDM method based on individual tolerance and risk attitude are proposed. Finally, the applicability of our method can be validated by an illustrative example. Sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis are supplied to indicate the rationality and superiority of our developed method.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on Trust Relationship and DEA Regret Cross-Efficiency
    Liu, Jinpei
    Shao, Longlong
    Jin, Feifei
    Tao, Zhifu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 71 : 824 - 836
  • [2] The classification-based consensus in multi-attribute group decision-making
    Chen, Xin
    Xu, Weijun
    Liang, Haiming
    Dong, Yucheng
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2020, 71 (09) : 1375 - 1389
  • [3] Heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making based on a fuzzy data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency model
    Huang, Yang
    Wang, Meiqiang
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 238
  • [4] A consensus model for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making with several attribute sets
    Gao, Yang
    Li, Dong-sheng
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 125 : 69 - 80
  • [5] A multi-stage hybrid consensus reaching model for multi-attribute large group decision-making: Integrating cardinal consensus and ordinal consensus
    Zhong, Xiangyu
    Xu, Xuanhua
    Yin, Xuanpeng
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 158
  • [6] Bounded rationality consensus reaching process with prospect theory and preventing individual weight manipulation for multi-attribute group decision making
    Jin, Feifei
    Lin, Hui
    Zhou, Ligang
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2024, 112
  • [7] Consensus model for probabilistic linguistic multi-attribute group decision-making based on incomplete social trust networks
    Kang, Kaiying
    Xie, Jialiang
    Liu, Xiaohui
    Qiu, Jianxiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND CYBERNETICS, 2024, 17 (04) : 844 - 868
  • [8] Multi-attribute group decision-making considering opinion dynamics
    Li, Yupeng
    Liu, Meng
    Cao, Jin
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Zhang, Na
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 184
  • [9] Consensus reaching with two-stage minimum adjustments in multi-attribute group decision making: A method based on preference-approval structure and prospect theory
    Long, Jie
    Liang, Haiming
    Gao, Lei
    Guo, Zhaoxia
    Dong, Yucheng
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 158
  • [10] A non-threshold consensus model based on the minimum cost and maximum consensus-increasing for multi-attribute large group decision-making
    Zhong, Xiangyu
    Xu, Xuanhua
    Pan, Bin
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2022, 77 : 90 - 106