Localization for surface microseismic monitoring based on arrival time correction and VFOM

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Chunlu [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Zeyan [1 ,2 ]
He, Renjie [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Linhang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jiang [3 ]
Zhou, Xiaohua [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Zubin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Coll Instrumentat & Elect Engn, Changchun, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Key Lab Geoexplorat Instrumentat, Minist Educ, Changchun, Peoples R China
[3] CNPC Bohai Drilling Engn Co Ltd, Tianjin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
unconventional resources; hydraulic fracturing; VFOM; microseismic event location; VELOCITY MODEL; INVERSION; EVENT; EXPLORATION; RESOURCES; STACKING; PICKING;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6501/ad545d
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Unconventional resources have emerged as the primary source to meet the escalating demand for energy consumption, with hydraulic fracturing standing out as an effective means of boosting production. The utilization of microseismic monitoring is crucial for acquiring real-time or semi-real-time extension information of the fracture network to guide the fracturing process. The precise positioning of microseismic events is a fundamental aspect of microseismic monitoring. Traditional methods relying on (relative) arrival time significantly impact positioning accuracy due to picking errors. While waveform-based methods offer high accuracy, they require precise velocity models and are time-consuming. To overcome challenges associated with arrival time pickup and velocity accuracy, we introduce a virtual field optimization method (VFOM) based on arrival time correction. Initially, an equivalent velocity model is established, and the arrival time difference resulting from the model transformation of the master event is calculated to correct the observed arrival time of the target event. Subsequently, we match detector pairs, establish hyperboloids based on the corrected arrival time difference, and employ the intersection point of all hyperboloids as the positioning result. After that, we use the location results of the master event to enhance the accuracy of the target event. Finally, we apply the proposed method to both synthetic test and field datasets, demonstrating a significant improvement in the positioning accuracy and stability provided by the novel method. The robustness against arrival time error renders it a suitable choice for surface monitoring applications where signal quality is compromised. Furthermore, the simplified velocity model significantly diminishes the computational requirements in the positioning process, enhancing its efficiency, and consequently holds vast potential for application in real-time monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An arrival time picker for microseismic rock fracturing waveforms and its quality control for automatic localization in tunnels
    Zhang, Wei
    Feng, Xia-Ting
    Bi, Xin
    Yao, Zhi-Bin
    Xiao, Ya-Xun
    Hu, Lei
    Niu, Wen-Jing
    Feng, Guang-Liang
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2021, 135
  • [2] Semi-Picking: A semi-supervised arrival time picking for microseismic monitoring based on the TransUGA network combined with SimMatch
    Wang, Qianfang
    Sheng, Guanqun
    Tang, Xingong
    Xie, Kai
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 240 (01) : 502 - 534
  • [3] Estimation of the Relative Arrival Time of Microseismic Events Based on Phase-Only Correlation
    Wang, Peng
    Chang, Xu
    Zhou, Xiyan
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (10)
  • [4] Coal mine microseismic velocity model inversion based on first arrival time difference
    Cong, Sen
    Wang, Yun-hong
    Cheng, Jian-Yuan
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 12 (01)
  • [5] Coal mine microseismic velocity model inversion based on first arrival time difference
    Sen Cong
    Yun-hong Wang
    Jian-Yuan Cheng
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2019, 12
  • [6] Array Processing in Microseismic Monitoring Detection, enhancement, and localization of induced seismicity
    McClellan, James. H.
    Eisner, Leo
    Liu, Entao
    Iqbal, Naveed
    Al-Shuhail, Abdullatif A.
    Kaka, Sanlinn I.
    IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2018, 35 (02) : 99 - 111
  • [7] Velocity model calibration for surface microseismic monitoring based on a 3D gently inclined layered equivalent model
    Wang, Chunlu
    Wei, Yanfei
    Sun, Feng
    Zhou, Xiaohua
    Jiang, Haiyu
    Chen, Zubin
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 20 (06) : 1117 - 1126
  • [8] A Novel Polarity Correction Method Developed on Cross Correlation Analysis for Downhole Migration-Based Location of Microseismic Events
    Mao, Qinghui
    Azeem, Tahir
    Gui, Zhixian
    Wang, Peng
    Zhong, Yu
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (08)
  • [9] Tilted TI models in surface microseismic monitoring
    Grechka, Vladimir
    GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 80 (06) : WC11 - WC23
  • [10] Determining S-Wave Arrival Times for Microseismic Monitoring in Tunnels Based on Instantaneous Phase Difference of Sensors
    Xiao, Yaxun
    Chen, Shujie
    Liu, Liu
    Feng, Guangliang
    Zhou, Junbo
    Hou, Dongbo
    Li, Shaojun
    Guo, Jianing
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2024, 57 (03) : 1781 - 1797