Integrating life cycle sustainability assessment in power flow optimization

被引:1
|
作者
Hallste, Teresa [1 ]
Guerrero, Jose M. [2 ]
Reina, Pablo [1 ]
Conde, Eduardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid UPM, Dept Energia & Combustibles, ETS Ingn Minas & Energia, Calle Rios Rosas 21, Madrid 28003, Spain
[2] Univ Pais Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UPV, Escuela Ingn Bilbao, Elect Engn Dept, Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo 1, Bilbao 48013, Spain
来源
关键词
Electricity production; Energy transition; Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment; Multi-objective optimization; Optimal Power Flow; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.segan.2024.101412
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The electric power network management is an important field of improving to achieve sustainability. Optimal Power Flows (OPFs) allow the efficient operation of the system. However, OPF algorithms only consider the operation stage of the power plants involved in the power system, neglecting the rest of stages of its life cycle. To evaluate the total effects of the power generation mix, this work develops a methodology to perform a MultiObjective OPF (MOOPF) with impact variables in electrical systems that integrate different generation technologies. These variables result from the application of a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA), consisting in environmental, economic, and social indexes with "cradle-to-grave" dimensions. To achieve this objective, the MOOPF is carried out operating a MATLAB algorithm over the IEEE57 bus system. It uses the epsilon-constraint method subject to the imposition of two or three impact variables. To examine the applications of this work, several simulations are performed optimizing different impact variables. Two different Spanish electricity scenarios are considered: the 2019 generation, and the 2030 objective generation proposed by the Spanish National Energy and Climate Plan. This tool broadens the scope of MOOPF assessment that can be used in a decision-making process. It allows to identify important environmental, economic, and social affections derived from system designs and limits. The study proves that the application of LCSA with MOOPF obtains realistic results making sustainability solutions technically viable. Additionally, different benefits and drawbacks, linked to the studied scenarios and grid disposition, are compared when conducting the proposed methodology for hourly generation management.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Sonia Valdivia
    Jana Gerta Backes
    Marzia Traverso
    Guido Sonnemann
    Stefano Cucurachi
    Jeroen B. Guinée
    Thomas Schaubroeck
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    Noemie Leroy-Parmentier
    Cássia Ugaya
    Claudia Peña
    Alessandra Zamagni
    Atsushi Inaba
    Milena Amaral
    Markus Berger
    Jolanta Dvarioniene
    Tatiana Vakhitova
    Catherine Benoit-Norris
    Martina Prox
    Rajendra Foolmaun
    Mark Goedkoop
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1900 - 1905
  • [42] Life cycle sustainability assessment method for concrete
    Choi, Wonyoung
    Tae, Sungho
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [43] Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment
    Martinez-Blanco, Julia
    Lehmann, Annekatrin
    Munoz, Pere
    Anton, Assumpcio
    Traverso, Marzia
    Rieradevall, Joan
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 69 : 34 - 48
  • [44] Geotraceability and life cycle assessment in environmental life cycle management: towards sustainability
    Ometto, Aldo
    Batistella, Mateus
    Guelere Filho, Americo
    Chuzel, Gerard
    Viau, Alain
    COMPLEX SYSTEMS CONCURRENT ENGINEERING: COLLABORATION, TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2007, : 673 - +
  • [45] Retrosynthetic Life Cycle Assessment: A Short Perspective on the Sustainability of Integrating Thermoplastics and Artificial Intelligence Into Composite Systems
    Yaghoubi, Vahid
    Kumru, Baris
    ADVANCED SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS, 2024, 8 (05)
  • [46] Integrated Sustainability Assessment: Exergy, Emergy, Life Cycle Assessment
    Cano-Londono, Natalia
    Heriberto, Cabezas
    Krisztian, Baracza
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 3
  • [47] Integrating life cycle assessment and health risk assessment of direct and indirect exposure (case study: A combined cycle power plant)
    Motahari, Azam
    Dana, Tooraj
    Kargari, Nargess
    Monavari, Seyed Masoud
    Fard, Neamatollah Jaafarzadeh Haghighi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 436
  • [48] Evaluating the Sustainability SWOT as a streamlined tool for life cycle sustainability assessment
    Hanna-Leena Pesonen
    Susanna Horn
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1780 - 1792
  • [49] Evaluating the Sustainability SWOT as a streamlined tool for life cycle sustainability assessment
    Pesonen, Hanna-Leena
    Horn, Susanna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (09): : 1780 - 1792
  • [50] A new lightweight design method integrating shape optimization with life cycle assessment for extrusion dies
    He, Yan
    Huang, Tao
    Wang, Yan
    Nie, Yi
    Li, YuFeng
    Wang, Yulin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 150 : 47 - 57