Integrating life cycle sustainability assessment in power flow optimization

被引:1
|
作者
Hallste, Teresa [1 ]
Guerrero, Jose M. [2 ]
Reina, Pablo [1 ]
Conde, Eduardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid UPM, Dept Energia & Combustibles, ETS Ingn Minas & Energia, Calle Rios Rosas 21, Madrid 28003, Spain
[2] Univ Pais Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UPV, Escuela Ingn Bilbao, Elect Engn Dept, Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo 1, Bilbao 48013, Spain
来源
关键词
Electricity production; Energy transition; Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment; Multi-objective optimization; Optimal Power Flow; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.segan.2024.101412
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The electric power network management is an important field of improving to achieve sustainability. Optimal Power Flows (OPFs) allow the efficient operation of the system. However, OPF algorithms only consider the operation stage of the power plants involved in the power system, neglecting the rest of stages of its life cycle. To evaluate the total effects of the power generation mix, this work develops a methodology to perform a MultiObjective OPF (MOOPF) with impact variables in electrical systems that integrate different generation technologies. These variables result from the application of a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA), consisting in environmental, economic, and social indexes with "cradle-to-grave" dimensions. To achieve this objective, the MOOPF is carried out operating a MATLAB algorithm over the IEEE57 bus system. It uses the epsilon-constraint method subject to the imposition of two or three impact variables. To examine the applications of this work, several simulations are performed optimizing different impact variables. Two different Spanish electricity scenarios are considered: the 2019 generation, and the 2030 objective generation proposed by the Spanish National Energy and Climate Plan. This tool broadens the scope of MOOPF assessment that can be used in a decision-making process. It allows to identify important environmental, economic, and social affections derived from system designs and limits. The study proves that the application of LCSA with MOOPF obtains realistic results making sustainability solutions technically viable. Additionally, different benefits and drawbacks, linked to the studied scenarios and grid disposition, are compared when conducting the proposed methodology for hourly generation management.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Framework for integrating animal welfare into life cycle sustainability assessment
    Scherer, Laura
    Tomasik, Brian
    Rueda, Oscar
    Pfister, Stephan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (07): : 1476 - 1490
  • [2] Framework for integrating animal welfare into life cycle sustainability assessment
    Laura Scherer
    Brian Tomasik
    Oscar Rueda
    Stephan Pfister
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 1476 - 1490
  • [3] Integrating life cycle assessment into supply chain optimization
    Hulagu, Selin
    Dullaert, Wout
    Eruguz, A. Sena
    Heijungs, Reinout
    Inghels, Dirk
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [4] Integrating urban metabolism and life cycle assessment to analyse urban sustainability
    Maranghi, Simone
    Parisi, Maria Laura
    Facchini, Angelo
    Rubino, Alessandro
    Kordas, Olga
    Basosi, Riccardo
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 112 (112)
  • [5] Life cycle sustainability assessment and circularity of geothermal power plants
    Li, Jingyi
    Tarpani, Raphael Ricardo Zepon
    Stamford, Laurence
    Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 35 : 141 - 156
  • [6] Integrating Digital Twin and Blockchain for dynamic building Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment
    Figueiredo, Karoline
    Hammad, Ahmed W. A.
    Pierott, Rodrigo
    Tam, Vivian W. Y.
    Haddad, Assed
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 97
  • [7] Life cycle sustainability assessment
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (04): : 373 - 376
  • [8] Life cycle sustainability assessment
    Alessandra Zamagni
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 373 - 376
  • [9] Sustainability Evaluation and Optimization on the Modern Agro-Pastoral Circular System Integrating Emergy Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment
    Shen, Yuan
    Shi, Linlin
    Tao, Yueyue
    Wang, Haihou
    Lu, Changying
    Li, Siyuan
    Shen, Mingxing
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [10] Sustainable technology transition in bus fleet management: Integrating life cycle sustainability assessment and multi-objective optimization
    Elagouz, Noura
    Onat, Nuri C.
    Kucukvar, Murat
    Kharbeche, Mohamed
    Kutty, Adeeb A.
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2025, 212