Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction

被引:0
作者
Khan, Adam Z. [1 ]
Vaughan, Alayna K. [2 ]
Aman, Zachary S. [2 ]
Lazarus, Mark D. [2 ]
Williams, Gerald R. [2 ]
Namdari, Surena [2 ]
机构
[1] Southern Calif Permanente Med Grp, 13652 Cantara St,Bldg 2, Panorama City, CA 91402 USA
[2] Rothman Orthopaed, 925 Chestnut St,5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
shoulder; rotator cuff; patient-reported outcomes; patient satisfaction; SIMPLE SHOULDER TEST; ASSESSMENT NUMERIC EVALUATION; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; AMERICAN SHOULDER; ELBOW SURGEONS; SCORES; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; PAIN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13092550
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) serve as metrics to gauge orthopedic treatment efficacy based on anchoring questions that do not account for a patient's satisfaction with their surgical outcome. This study evaluates if reaching MCID, SCB, or PASS values for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Single Alpha Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) correlates with overall patient satisfaction. Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective study of patients who underwent RCR from 2015 to 2019. Pre-operative and 2 year postoperative ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS scores were recorded. Patients underwent a survey to assess: (1) what is your overall satisfaction with your surgical outcome? (scale 1 to 10); (2) if you could go back in time, would you undergo this operation again? (yes/no); (3) for the same condition, would you recommend this operation to a friend or family member? (yes/no). Spearman correlation coefficients were run to assess relationship between reaching MCID, SCB, or PASS and satisfaction. Results: Ninety-two patients were included. Mean preoperative ASES was 51.1 +/- 16.9, SANE was 43.3 +/- 20.9, SST was 5.4 +/- 2.9, and VAS was 4.6 +/- 2.1. Mean 2 year ASES was 83.9 +/- 18.5, SANE was 81.7 +/- 27.0, SST was 9.8 +/- 3.2, and VAS was 1.4 +/- 1.9. Mean patient satisfaction was 9.0 +/- 1.9; 89 (96.7%) patients would undergo surgery again and recommend surgery. Correlation for reaching PASS for SANE and satisfaction was moderate. Correlation coefficients were very weak for all other outcome metrics. Conclusions: Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS in ASES, SANE, SST, or VAS following RCR did not correlate with a patient's overall satisfaction or willingness to undergo surgery again or recommend surgery. Further investigation into the statistical credibility and overall clinical value of MCID, SCB, and PASS is necessary.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Establishing minimum clinically important difference for patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Nie, James W.
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    MacGregor, Keith R.
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    Zheng, Eileen
    Singh, Kern
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2023, 165 (02) : 325 - 334
  • [42] Patient acceptable symptom state and minimal clinically important difference for patient-reported outcomes in systemic sclerosis: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing personalized physical therapy to usual care
    Daste, Camille
    Rannou, Francois
    Mouthon, Luc
    Sanchez, Katherine
    Roren, Alexandra
    Tiffreau, Vincent
    Hachulla, Eric
    Thoumie, Philippe
    Cabane, Jean
    Chatelus, Emmanuel
    Sibilia, Jean
    Poiraudeau, Serge
    Nguyen, Christelle
    SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2019, 48 (04) : 694 - 700
  • [43] Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Ogura, Yoji
    Ogura, Koichi
    Kobayashi, Yoshiomi
    Kitagawa, Takahiro
    Yonezawa, Yoshiro
    Takahashi, Yoshiyuki
    Yoshida, Kodai
    Yasuda, Akimasa
    Shinozaki, Yoshio
    Ogawa, Jun
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 196
  • [44] Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Patel, Dil V.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Yom, Kelly H.
    Kudaravalli, Krishna T.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 13 (03) : 262 - 269
  • [45] Do patient-reported outcome measures correlate with clinical follow-up after arthroscopic treatment of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint?
    Bengtsson, Martin
    Fransson, Philip
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 122 (04) : E21 - E26
  • [46] Commentary: Statistical significance and clinical significance - A call to consider patient reported outcome measures, effect size, confidence interval and minimal clinically important difference (MCID)
    Fleischmann, Michael
    Vaughan, Brett
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2019, 23 (04) : 690 - 694
  • [47] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important changes of common patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures of physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis
    Mostafaee, Neda
    Pirayeh, Nahid
    Fakoor, Mohammad
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 40 (11) : 2661 - 2669
  • [48] A tiered system using substantial clinical benefit and patient acceptable symptomatic state scores to evaluate 2-year outcomes of hip arthroscopy with the Hip Outcome Score
    Martin, RobRoy L.
    Kivlan, Benjamin R.
    Christoforetti, John J.
    Wolff, Andrew B.
    Nho, Shane J.
    Salvo, John P.
    Van Thiel, Geoff
    Matsuda, Dean
    Carreira, Dominic S.
    JOURNAL OF HIP PRESERVATION SURGERY, 2020, 7 (01): : 62 - 69
  • [49] Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for common outcome instruments in patients with a closed humeral shaft fracture - analysis of the FISH randomised clinical trial data
    Ibounig, Thomas
    Juurakko, Joona
    Lahdeoja, Tuomas
    Sumrein, Bakir O.
    Jarvinen, Teppo L. N.
    Paavola, Mika
    Ardern, Clare L.
    Karjalainen, Teemu
    Taimela, Simo
    Ramo, Lasse
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [50] Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Yom, Kelly H.
    Kudaravalli, Krishna T.
    Lopez, Gregory D.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (01): : E92 - E97