Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction

被引:0
|
作者
Khan, Adam Z. [1 ]
Vaughan, Alayna K. [2 ]
Aman, Zachary S. [2 ]
Lazarus, Mark D. [2 ]
Williams, Gerald R. [2 ]
Namdari, Surena [2 ]
机构
[1] Southern Calif Permanente Med Grp, 13652 Cantara St,Bldg 2, Panorama City, CA 91402 USA
[2] Rothman Orthopaed, 925 Chestnut St,5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
shoulder; rotator cuff; patient-reported outcomes; patient satisfaction; SIMPLE SHOULDER TEST; ASSESSMENT NUMERIC EVALUATION; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; AMERICAN SHOULDER; ELBOW SURGEONS; SCORES; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; PAIN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13092550
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) serve as metrics to gauge orthopedic treatment efficacy based on anchoring questions that do not account for a patient's satisfaction with their surgical outcome. This study evaluates if reaching MCID, SCB, or PASS values for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Single Alpha Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) correlates with overall patient satisfaction. Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective study of patients who underwent RCR from 2015 to 2019. Pre-operative and 2 year postoperative ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS scores were recorded. Patients underwent a survey to assess: (1) what is your overall satisfaction with your surgical outcome? (scale 1 to 10); (2) if you could go back in time, would you undergo this operation again? (yes/no); (3) for the same condition, would you recommend this operation to a friend or family member? (yes/no). Spearman correlation coefficients were run to assess relationship between reaching MCID, SCB, or PASS and satisfaction. Results: Ninety-two patients were included. Mean preoperative ASES was 51.1 +/- 16.9, SANE was 43.3 +/- 20.9, SST was 5.4 +/- 2.9, and VAS was 4.6 +/- 2.1. Mean 2 year ASES was 83.9 +/- 18.5, SANE was 81.7 +/- 27.0, SST was 9.8 +/- 3.2, and VAS was 1.4 +/- 1.9. Mean patient satisfaction was 9.0 +/- 1.9; 89 (96.7%) patients would undergo surgery again and recommend surgery. Correlation for reaching PASS for SANE and satisfaction was moderate. Correlation coefficients were very weak for all other outcome metrics. Conclusions: Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS in ASES, SANE, SST, or VAS following RCR did not correlate with a patient's overall satisfaction or willingness to undergo surgery again or recommend surgery. Further investigation into the statistical credibility and overall clinical value of MCID, SCB, and PASS is necessary.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Kim, Dong Min
    Kim, Tae Hyung
    Kholinne, Erica
    Park, Jeong Hee
    Shin, Myung Jin
    Kim, Hyojune
    Park, Dongjun
    Jeon, In-Ho
    Koh, Kyoung Hwan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (11) : 2650 - 2659
  • [2] Defining minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit for the visual analog scale pain score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Zeng, Gerald Joseph
    Moorthy, Vikaesh
    Hao, Ying
    Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen
    JOURNAL OF ISAKOS JOINT DISORDERS & ORTHOPAEDIC SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 9 (04) : 592 - 597
  • [3] Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability
    Scanaliato, John P.
    Green, Clare K.
    Sandler, Alexis B.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Hettrich, Carolyn M.
    Parnes, Nata
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (01) : 207 - 214
  • [4] Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Outcome Measures Relating to Shoulder Pathology and Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Su, Favian
    Allahabadi, Sachin
    Bongbong, Dale N.
    Feeley, Brian T.
    Lansdown, Drew A.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 (01) : 27 - 46
  • [5] Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis
    Puzzitiello, Richard N.
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Liu, Joseph N.
    Agarwalla, Avinesh
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Forsythe, Brian
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (04) : 639 - 647
  • [6] Guidelines for Proper Reporting of Clinical Significance, Including Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Maximal Outcome Improvement
    Harris, Joshua D.
    Brand, Jefferson C.
    Cote, Mark
    Waterman, Brian
    Dhawan, Aman
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 39 (02) : 145 - 150
  • [7] Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Outcome Measures Relating to Shoulder Pathology and Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Favian Su
    Sachin Allahabadi
    Dale N. Bongbong
    Brian T. Feeley
    Drew A. Lansdown
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2021, 14 : 27 - 46
  • [8] Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) following surgical knee ligament reconstruction: a systematic review
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Jeyaraman, Madhan
    Schafer, Luise
    Rath, Bjoern
    Huber, Thorsten
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2025, 51 (01)
  • [9] Values derived from patient reported outcomes in spine surgery: a systematic review of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state
    Issa, Tariq Z.
    Lee, Yunsoo
    Henry, Tyler W.
    Trenchfield, Delano
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (10) : 3333 - 3351
  • [10] Values derived from patient reported outcomes in spine surgery: a systematic review of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state
    Tariq Z. Issa
    Yunsoo Lee
    Tyler W. Henry
    Delano Trenchfield
    Gregory D. Schroeder
    Alexander R. Vaccaro
    Christopher K. Kepler
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 3333 - 3351