Life cycle impact and economic assessment of decentralized strategies to treat source-separated wastewater

被引:1
作者
Thomas, Benjamin D. [1 ,2 ]
Marks, Annaliese [1 ]
Smerigan, Blake [1 ]
Aburto-Vazquez, Gustavo [1 ]
Uludag-Demirer, Sibel [1 ]
Dusenbury, James S. [2 ]
Liao, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Anaerob Digest Res & Educ Ctr ADREC, Biosyst & Agr Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] US ARMY DEVCOM Ground Vehicle Syst Ctr GVSC, Fuel & Water Equipment Branch, Selfridge, ND USA
关键词
Blackwater; Graywater; Mass and energy balance; Economic assessment; Life cycle impact assessment; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; REMOVAL; FATE; PHARMACEUTICALS; DEGRADATION; PERFORMANCE; CHLOROFORM; EFFLUENT; ACETONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105550
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Decentralized wastewater treatment and recycling strategies have the potential to address the water scarcity issues facing a large percentage of the population. Compared to centralized wastewater treatment facilities, decentralized wastewater treatment with source separation is a potential solution to cost-effective wastewater treatment. This study performed a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment and techno-economic analysis comparison on five treatment scenarios for two source-separated wastewaters (blackwater and graywater). The treatment scenarios were composed of different combinations of three currently available and scalable technologies: activated sludge, anaerobic digestion (AD), and membrane filtration. Activated sludge is utilized to treat source-separated wastewater. Anaerobic digestion is applied to convert the sludge to biogas for energy generation. The membrane filtration including ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis further polish the treated wastewater for discharge or recycling. The results elucidated that Treatment B utilizing activated sludge and membrane filtration to treat blackwater and graywater separately, and then applying anaerobic digestion to reduce the activated sludge amount and generate methane energy had overall better environmental and technoeconomic performances among the studied treatment scenarios. Treatment B had a water recovery efficiency of 99.9 % with a minimum net energy demand of 4.2 kWh-e/m3 recycled water, as well as lower treatment cost. As for the pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) removal and EcoToxicity, Treatment B shows a comparable performance. The study demonstrated that synergistic combination of activated sludge, AD, and membrane technologies on source-separated wastewaters can create an environmentally friendly, technically sound, and economically feasible decentralized solution to treat wastewater. Meanwhile, the study also indicated that biological treatments are critical to remove PPCPs in the wastewater and alleviate their environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life Cycle and Economic Analyses of the Removal of Pesticides and Pharmaceuticals from Municipal Wastewater by Anodic Oxidation
    Surra, Elena
    Correia, Manuela
    Figueiredo, Sonia
    Silva, Jaime Gabriel
    Vieira, Joana
    Jorge, Sandra
    Pazos, Marta
    Sanroman, Maria Angeles
    Lapa, Nuno
    Delerue-Matos, Cristina
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [42] Sustainable strategies for reducing environmental impact in concrete block manufacturing: a comprehensive life cycle assessment
    Ashokan, Anbuchezian
    Jaganathan, Sivakumar
    Rajendran, Silambarasan
    Dhairiyasamy, Ratchagaraja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2024, 21 (01) : 187 - 204
  • [43] Ranking potential impacts of priority and emerging pollutants in urban wastewater through life cycle impact assessment
    Munoz, Ivan
    Gomez, M. Jose
    Molina-Diaz, Antonio
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    Fernandez-Alba, Amadeo R.
    Garcia-Calvo, Eloy
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2008, 74 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [44] Life cycle assessment of introducing an anaerobic digester in a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Spain
    Blanco, David
    Collado, Sergio
    Laca, Adriana
    Diaz, Mario
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 73 (04) : 835 - 842
  • [45] Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment in developing countries: A review
    Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro
    Tarpani, Raphael Ricardo Zepon
    WATER RESEARCH, 2019, 153 : 63 - 79
  • [46] Economic modelling and indicators in life cycle sustainability assessment
    Wood, Richard
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (09) : 1710 - 1721
  • [47] Scale-up modelling and life cycle assessment of electrochemical oxidation in wastewater treatment
    Feijoo, Sara
    Estevez, Sofia
    Kamali, Mohammadreza
    Dewil, Raf
    Moreira, Maria Teresa
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 455
  • [48] Quantification of environmental impacts of domestic wastewater treatment using life cycle assessment: A review
    Sabeen, Ali Hussein
    Noor, Zainura Zainon
    Ngadi, Norzita
    Almuraisy, Sager
    Raheem, Ademola Bolanle
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 190 : 221 - 233
  • [49] Life cycle assessment and economic analysis of the electric motorcycle in the city of Barcelona and the impact on air pollution
    Carranza, Gerson
    Do Nascimiento, Martzel
    Fanals, Josep
    Febrer, Josep
    Valderrama, Cesar
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 821
  • [50] Economic modelling and indicators in life cycle sustainability assessment
    Richard Wood
    Edgar G. Hertwich
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1710 - 1721