Life cycle impact and economic assessment of decentralized strategies to treat source-separated wastewater

被引:1
作者
Thomas, Benjamin D. [1 ,2 ]
Marks, Annaliese [1 ]
Smerigan, Blake [1 ]
Aburto-Vazquez, Gustavo [1 ]
Uludag-Demirer, Sibel [1 ]
Dusenbury, James S. [2 ]
Liao, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Anaerob Digest Res & Educ Ctr ADREC, Biosyst & Agr Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] US ARMY DEVCOM Ground Vehicle Syst Ctr GVSC, Fuel & Water Equipment Branch, Selfridge, ND USA
关键词
Blackwater; Graywater; Mass and energy balance; Economic assessment; Life cycle impact assessment; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; REMOVAL; FATE; PHARMACEUTICALS; DEGRADATION; PERFORMANCE; CHLOROFORM; EFFLUENT; ACETONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105550
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Decentralized wastewater treatment and recycling strategies have the potential to address the water scarcity issues facing a large percentage of the population. Compared to centralized wastewater treatment facilities, decentralized wastewater treatment with source separation is a potential solution to cost-effective wastewater treatment. This study performed a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment and techno-economic analysis comparison on five treatment scenarios for two source-separated wastewaters (blackwater and graywater). The treatment scenarios were composed of different combinations of three currently available and scalable technologies: activated sludge, anaerobic digestion (AD), and membrane filtration. Activated sludge is utilized to treat source-separated wastewater. Anaerobic digestion is applied to convert the sludge to biogas for energy generation. The membrane filtration including ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis further polish the treated wastewater for discharge or recycling. The results elucidated that Treatment B utilizing activated sludge and membrane filtration to treat blackwater and graywater separately, and then applying anaerobic digestion to reduce the activated sludge amount and generate methane energy had overall better environmental and technoeconomic performances among the studied treatment scenarios. Treatment B had a water recovery efficiency of 99.9 % with a minimum net energy demand of 4.2 kWh-e/m3 recycled water, as well as lower treatment cost. As for the pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) removal and EcoToxicity, Treatment B shows a comparable performance. The study demonstrated that synergistic combination of activated sludge, AD, and membrane technologies on source-separated wastewaters can create an environmentally friendly, technically sound, and economically feasible decentralized solution to treat wastewater. Meanwhile, the study also indicated that biological treatments are critical to remove PPCPs in the wastewater and alleviate their environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of life cycle toxicity assessment methods for municipal wastewater treatment with the inclusion of direct emissions of metals, PPCPs and EDCs
    Rashid, Siti Safirah
    Liu, Yong-Qiang
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 756
  • [22] From Life Cycle Costing to Economic Life Cycle AssessmentIntroducing an Economic Impact Pathway
    Neugebauer, Sabrina
    Forin, Silvia
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (05)
  • [23] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Advanced Wastewater Treatment Processes for Removal of Chemicals of Emerging Concern
    Rahman, Sheikh M.
    Eckelman, Matthew J.
    Onnis-Hayden, Annalisa
    Gu, April Z.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (19) : 11346 - 11358
  • [24] Constructed wetlands for winery wastewater treatment: A comparative Life Cycle Assessment
    Flores, Laura
    Garcia, Joan
    Pena, Rocio
    Garfi, Marianna
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 659 : 1567 - 1576
  • [25] Treatment of laundry wastewater by different processes: Optimization and life cycle assessment
    Melian, Elisenda Pulido
    Santiago, Dunia E.
    Leon, Elena
    Reboso, Jenifer Vaswani
    Herrera-Melian, Jose Alberto
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (02):
  • [26] Life cycle and economic assessment of enhanced ecological floating beds applied water purification
    Yao, Xiaochen
    Zheng, Guodi
    Cao, Yun
    Yu, Bao
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (36) : 49574 - 49587
  • [27] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of two advanced treatment steps for wastewater micropollutants: How to determine whole-system environmental benefits?
    Risch, Eva
    Jaumaux, Louis
    Maeseele, Camille
    Choubert, Jean-Marc
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 805
  • [28] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of nanotechnology-based wastewater treatment: Status, challenges and future prospectives
    Pandit, Shally
    Yadav, Nisha
    Sharma, Pragati
    Prakash, Anand
    Kuila, Arindam
    JOURNAL OF THE TAIWAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2025, 166
  • [29] Evaluating source separation wastewater systems using traditional life cycle assessment and the planetary boundaries approach
    Lima, Priscila de Morais
    Ferrer, Gertri
    Kjerstadius, Hamse
    Ryberg, Morten
    Mcconville, Jennifer Rae
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 422
  • [30] Environmental Impact Assessment of Heat and Power Cogeneration in Tehran Wastewater Treatment Plant Based on the Life Cycle Assessment
    Rahmati, Mohammad
    Rasouli, Majid
    Haji Agha Alizadeh, Hossein
    Ataeiyan, Behnam
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2024, 2024