Life cycle impact and economic assessment of decentralized strategies to treat source-separated wastewater

被引:1
作者
Thomas, Benjamin D. [1 ,2 ]
Marks, Annaliese [1 ]
Smerigan, Blake [1 ]
Aburto-Vazquez, Gustavo [1 ]
Uludag-Demirer, Sibel [1 ]
Dusenbury, James S. [2 ]
Liao, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Anaerob Digest Res & Educ Ctr ADREC, Biosyst & Agr Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] US ARMY DEVCOM Ground Vehicle Syst Ctr GVSC, Fuel & Water Equipment Branch, Selfridge, ND USA
关键词
Blackwater; Graywater; Mass and energy balance; Economic assessment; Life cycle impact assessment; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; REMOVAL; FATE; PHARMACEUTICALS; DEGRADATION; PERFORMANCE; CHLOROFORM; EFFLUENT; ACETONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105550
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Decentralized wastewater treatment and recycling strategies have the potential to address the water scarcity issues facing a large percentage of the population. Compared to centralized wastewater treatment facilities, decentralized wastewater treatment with source separation is a potential solution to cost-effective wastewater treatment. This study performed a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment and techno-economic analysis comparison on five treatment scenarios for two source-separated wastewaters (blackwater and graywater). The treatment scenarios were composed of different combinations of three currently available and scalable technologies: activated sludge, anaerobic digestion (AD), and membrane filtration. Activated sludge is utilized to treat source-separated wastewater. Anaerobic digestion is applied to convert the sludge to biogas for energy generation. The membrane filtration including ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis further polish the treated wastewater for discharge or recycling. The results elucidated that Treatment B utilizing activated sludge and membrane filtration to treat blackwater and graywater separately, and then applying anaerobic digestion to reduce the activated sludge amount and generate methane energy had overall better environmental and technoeconomic performances among the studied treatment scenarios. Treatment B had a water recovery efficiency of 99.9 % with a minimum net energy demand of 4.2 kWh-e/m3 recycled water, as well as lower treatment cost. As for the pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) removal and EcoToxicity, Treatment B shows a comparable performance. The study demonstrated that synergistic combination of activated sludge, AD, and membrane technologies on source-separated wastewaters can create an environmentally friendly, technically sound, and economically feasible decentralized solution to treat wastewater. Meanwhile, the study also indicated that biological treatments are critical to remove PPCPs in the wastewater and alleviate their environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle and techno-economic assessment of source-separated wastewater-integrated microalgae biofuel production plant: A nutrient organization approach
    Li, Peiyao
    Luo, Yiqing
    Yuan, Xigang
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 344
  • [2] Life cycle and economic assessment of source-separated MSW collection with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: a case study in China
    Dong, Jun
    Ni, Mingjiang
    Chi, Yong
    Zou, Daoan
    Fu, Chao
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2013, 20 (08) : 5512 - 5524
  • [3] Life cycle and economic assessment of source-separated MSW collection with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: a case study in China
    Jun Dong
    Mingjiang Ni
    Yong Chi
    Daoan Zou
    Chao Fu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20 : 5512 - 5524
  • [4] Life-Cycle Cost and Environmental Assessment of Decentralized Nitrogen Recovery Using Ion Exchange from Source-Separated Urine through Spatial Modeling
    Kavvada, Olga
    Tarpeh, William A.
    Horvath, Arpad
    Nelson, Kara L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (21) : 12061 - 12071
  • [5] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of slaughterhouse wastewater treatment
    Teo, Chuan Jiet
    Karkou, Efthalia
    Vlad, Ozana
    Vyrkou, Antonia
    Savvakis, Nikolaos
    Arampatzis, George
    Angelis-Dimakis, Athanasios
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2023, 200 : 550 - 565
  • [6] Life-cycle assessment of decentralized solutions for wastewater treatment in small communities
    Lourenco, N.
    Nunes, L. M.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 84 (08) : 1954 - 1968
  • [7] Impact of organic polyelectrolytes on coagulation of source-separated black water
    Kozminykh, Pavlo
    Heistad, Arve
    Ratnaweera, Harsha C.
    Todt, Daniel
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 37 (14) : 1723 - 1732
  • [8] Source-Separated Industrial Wastewater Is a Candidate for Biogas Production through Anaerobic Digestion
    Elliott, Jake A. K.
    Krohn, Christian
    Ball, Andrew S.
    FERMENTATION-BASEL, 2024, 10 (03):
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment options for small and decentralized communities
    Machado, A. P.
    Urbano, L.
    Brito, A. G.
    Janknecht, P.
    Salas, J. J.
    Nogueira, R.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 56 (03) : 15 - 22
  • [10] Is it better to remove pharmaceuticals in decentralized or conventional wastewater treatment plants? A life cycle assessment comparison
    Igos, Elorri
    Benetto, Enrico
    Venditti, Silvia
    Kohler, Christian
    Cornelissen, Alex
    Moeller, Ruth
    Biwer, Arno
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 438 : 533 - 540