Audiological Outcomes of Weekly vs. Triweekly Cisplatin in Head and Neck Cancer with Cochlear-Sparing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

被引:1
作者
Gamez, Mauricio E. [1 ]
Blakaj, Dukagjin M. [2 ]
Bhateja, Priyanka [3 ]
Custer, Amy [4 ]
Klamer, Brett G. [5 ]
Pan, Jeff [5 ]
Gogineni, Emile [2 ]
Baliga, Sujith [2 ]
Bonomi, Marcelo R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Rochester, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Oncol Rehabil Team, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Ctr Biostat, Dept Biomed Informat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
ototoxicity; audiological outcomes; weekly cisplatin; high-dose cisplatin; head and neck cancer; IMRT; adverse events; LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; RANDOMIZED PHASE-III; HEARING-LOSS; CHEMOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; TRIAL; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; OTOTOXICITY;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16122228
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary: Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is the standard of care for patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck area. Recent data from randomized phase 3 studies showed that weekly cisplatin has the same oncological outcomes as high-dose triweekly cisplatin when combined with definitive radiation. In this study, audiologic data were prospectively collected before, during, and after treatment completion. Standard audiogram evaluation was used in all cases. The primary endpoint was a hearing change grade of >= 3 (CTCAE v5.0) after completion of chemoradiation. The high-dose cisplatin regimen significantly increased the >= grade 3 severe irreversible ototoxicity risk compared to the low-dose weekly regimen, irrespective of cumulative cisplatin dose, even with the use of cochlear-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy. No significant difference in oncologic outcomes was observed between the two schedules. These findings should be validated in a larger prospective multi-institutional study. Cisplatin, one of the most ototoxic anti-neoplastic agents, causes permanent hearing loss in up to 90% of patients. We assessed ototoxicity rates and prospectively collected audiologic outcomes of patients receiving low-dose or high-dose cisplatin with concurrent cochlear-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) receiving definitive or adjuvant cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were analyzed. Cisplatin was administered either in low doses weekly (40 mg/m(2)) for up to seven doses or in high doses triweekly (100 mg/m(2)) for up to three doses. Cochlear-sparing IMRT was delivered in all cases. Audiologic data were prospectively collected before, during, and after treatment completion. The primary endpoint was a hearing change grade of >= 3 after CRT completion. Of the 96 HNSCC patients evaluated, 69 received weekly cisplatin and 58 received definitive CRT. Of patients receiving weekly cisplatin, 13% developed >= G3 ototoxicity vs. 56% of patients who received triweekly cisplatin (p < 0.001). In multivariable modeling, the cisplatin dose schedule remained significant (OR: 8.4, 95%CI: 2.8-27.8, p < 0.001) for risk of severe irreversible ototoxicity. Triweekly cisplatin CRT significantly increased the >= G3 severe irreversible ototoxicity risk compared to low-dose weekly cisplatin, irrespective of the cumulative cisplatin dose, even with the use of cochlear-sparing IMRT. No significant difference in oncologic outcomes was observed between the two schedules.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intensity modulated radiation therapy and oral mucosa sparing in Head and neck cancer patients: A systematic review on behalf of Italian Association of Radiation Oncology - Head and neck working group
    De Sanctis, V.
    Merlotti, A.
    De Felice, F.
    Trignani, M.
    Dell'Oca, I.
    Lastrucci, L.
    Molteni, M.
    Frakulli, R.
    Bunkheila, F.
    Bacigalupo, A.
    Paiar, F.
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2019, 139 : 24 - 30
  • [32] Unilateral and bilateral neck SIB for head and neck cancer patients Intensity-modulated proton therapy, tomotherapy, and RapidArc
    Stromberger, Carmen
    Cozzi, Luca
    Budach, Volker
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Ghadjar, Pirus
    Wlodarczyk, Waldemar
    Jamil, Basil
    Raguse, Jan D.
    Boettcher, Arne
    Marnitz, Simone
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2016, 192 (04) : 232 - 239
  • [33] Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of cochlear-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy in patients with parotid cancer (COSTAR; CRUK/08/004)
    Nutting, Christopher M.
    Morden, James P.
    Beasley, Matthew
    Bhide, Shreerang
    Cook, Audrey
    De Winton, Emma
    Emson, Marie
    Evans, Mererid
    Fresco, Lydia
    Gollins, Simon
    Gujral, Dorothy
    Harrington, Kevin
    Joseph, Mano
    Lemon, Catherine
    Luxon, Linda
    van den Blink, Qurrat
    Mendes, Ruheena
    Miah, Aisha
    Newbold, Kate
    Prestwich, Robin
    Robinson, Martin
    Sanghera, Paul
    Simpson, Joanna
    Sivaramalingam, Muthiah
    Srihari, Narayanan Nair
    Sydenham, Mark
    Wells, Emma
    Witts, Stephanie
    Hall, Emma
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 103 : 249 - 258
  • [34] Comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy alone vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy in elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients (aged >65 years)
    Mi, Jing-Lin
    Meng, Yi-Liang
    Wu, Hong-liang
    Cao, Yi-Lin
    Zhang, Bin
    Pan, Yu-Fei
    Zhou, Yuan-Yuan
    Fan, Jin-Fang
    Liao, Shu-Fang
    Qin, Xiao-Li
    Yao, Da-Cheng
    Jiang, Wei
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2020, 196 (03) : 270 - 279
  • [35] Comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer based on radiobiological modelling
    Nguyen, My-Lien
    Afrin, Kazi T.
    Newbury, Patrick
    Henson, Christina
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2023, 22
  • [36] The effect of intravenous contrast on intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose calculations for head and neck cancer
    Liauw, SL
    Amdur, RJ
    Mendenhall, WM
    Palta, J
    Kim, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 28 (05): : 456 - 459
  • [37] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marta, Gustavo Nader
    Silva, Valter
    Carvalho, Heloisa de Andrade
    de Arruda, Fernando Freire
    Hanna, Samir Abdallah
    Gadia, Rafael
    Fernandes da Silva, Joao Luis
    Miranda Correa, Sebastiao Francisco
    Cintra Vita Abreu, Carlos Eduardo
    Riera, Rachel
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 110 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [38] Patterns of Care and Outcomes Associated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy for Older Patients With Head-and-Neck Cancer
    Yu, James B.
    Soulos, Pamela R.
    Sharma, Richa
    Makarov, Danil V.
    Decker, Roy H.
    Smith, Benjamin D.
    Desai, Rani A.
    Cramer, Laura D.
    Gross, Cary P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (01): : E101 - E107
  • [39] Comparing the oncologic outcomes of proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Chang, Chia-Lun
    Lin, Kuan-Chou
    Chen, Wan-Ming
    Shia, Ben-Chang
    Wu, Szu-Yuan
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190
  • [40] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with Concurrent Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Toxicities and Efficacy
    Vlacich, Gregory
    Diaz, Roberto
    Thorpe, Steven W.
    Murphy, Barbara A.
    Kirby, Fwyndee
    Sinard, Robert J.
    Shakhtour, Bashar
    Shyr, Yu
    Murphy, Patrick
    Netterville, James L.
    Yarbrough, Wendell G.
    Cmelak, Anthony J.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2012, 17 (05) : 673 - 681