Audiological Outcomes of Weekly vs. Triweekly Cisplatin in Head and Neck Cancer with Cochlear-Sparing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

被引:1
作者
Gamez, Mauricio E. [1 ]
Blakaj, Dukagjin M. [2 ]
Bhateja, Priyanka [3 ]
Custer, Amy [4 ]
Klamer, Brett G. [5 ]
Pan, Jeff [5 ]
Gogineni, Emile [2 ]
Baliga, Sujith [2 ]
Bonomi, Marcelo R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Rochester, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Oncol Rehabil Team, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Ctr Biostat, Dept Biomed Informat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
ototoxicity; audiological outcomes; weekly cisplatin; high-dose cisplatin; head and neck cancer; IMRT; adverse events; LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; RANDOMIZED PHASE-III; HEARING-LOSS; CHEMOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; TRIAL; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; OTOTOXICITY;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16122228
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary: Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is the standard of care for patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck area. Recent data from randomized phase 3 studies showed that weekly cisplatin has the same oncological outcomes as high-dose triweekly cisplatin when combined with definitive radiation. In this study, audiologic data were prospectively collected before, during, and after treatment completion. Standard audiogram evaluation was used in all cases. The primary endpoint was a hearing change grade of >= 3 (CTCAE v5.0) after completion of chemoradiation. The high-dose cisplatin regimen significantly increased the >= grade 3 severe irreversible ototoxicity risk compared to the low-dose weekly regimen, irrespective of cumulative cisplatin dose, even with the use of cochlear-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy. No significant difference in oncologic outcomes was observed between the two schedules. These findings should be validated in a larger prospective multi-institutional study. Cisplatin, one of the most ototoxic anti-neoplastic agents, causes permanent hearing loss in up to 90% of patients. We assessed ototoxicity rates and prospectively collected audiologic outcomes of patients receiving low-dose or high-dose cisplatin with concurrent cochlear-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) receiving definitive or adjuvant cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were analyzed. Cisplatin was administered either in low doses weekly (40 mg/m(2)) for up to seven doses or in high doses triweekly (100 mg/m(2)) for up to three doses. Cochlear-sparing IMRT was delivered in all cases. Audiologic data were prospectively collected before, during, and after treatment completion. The primary endpoint was a hearing change grade of >= 3 after CRT completion. Of the 96 HNSCC patients evaluated, 69 received weekly cisplatin and 58 received definitive CRT. Of patients receiving weekly cisplatin, 13% developed >= G3 ototoxicity vs. 56% of patients who received triweekly cisplatin (p < 0.001). In multivariable modeling, the cisplatin dose schedule remained significant (OR: 8.4, 95%CI: 2.8-27.8, p < 0.001) for risk of severe irreversible ototoxicity. Triweekly cisplatin CRT significantly increased the >= G3 severe irreversible ototoxicity risk compared to low-dose weekly cisplatin, irrespective of the cumulative cisplatin dose, even with the use of cochlear-sparing IMRT. No significant difference in oncologic outcomes was observed between the two schedules.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intensity modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: The standard
    Maingon, P.
    Crehange, G.
    Chamois, J.
    Khoury, C.
    Truc, G.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2011, 15 (6-7): : 473 - 476
  • [22] Weekly Adaptive Radiotherapy vs Standard Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Improving Salivary Function in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial
    Castelli, Joel
    Thariat, Juliette
    Benezery, Karen
    Hasbini, Ali
    Gery, Bernard
    Berger, Antoine
    Liem, Xavier
    Guihard, Sebastien
    Chapet, Sophie
    Thureau, Sebastien
    Auberdiac, Pierre
    Pommier, Pascal
    Ruffier, Amandine
    Perrier, Lionel
    Devillers, Anne
    Campillo-Gimenez, Boris
    de Crevoisier, Renaud
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2023, 9 (08) : 1056 - 1064
  • [23] Severe Oral Mucositis After Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer
    Iovoli, Austin J.
    Turecki, Lauren
    Qiu, Michelle L.
    Khan, Michael
    Smith, Kelsey
    Yu, Han
    Ma, Sung Jun
    Farrugia, Mark K.
    Singh, Anurag K.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (10) : E2337265
  • [24] Comparison of swallowing function after intensity-modulated radiation therapy and conventional radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
    Pauloski, Barbara Roa
    Rademaker, Alfred W.
    Logemann, Jerilyn A.
    Discekici-Harris, Muveddet
    Mittal, Bharat B.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2015, 37 (11): : 1575 - 1582
  • [25] Parotid sparing and quality of life in long-term survivors of locally advanced head and neck cancer after intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Tribius, Silke
    Haladyn, Sven
    Hanken, Henning
    Busch, Chia-Jung
    Krull, Andreas
    Petersen, Cordula
    Bergelt, Corinna
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2021, 197 (03) : 219 - 230
  • [26] Unknown primary head and neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: To what extent the volume should be irradiated
    Lu, Heming
    Yao, Min
    Tan, Huaming
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 45 (06) : 474 - 479
  • [27] Efficacy of concurrent cetuximab vs. 5-fluorouracil/carboplatin or high-dose cisplatin with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for locally-advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNSCC)
    Shapiro, Lauren Q.
    Sherman, Eric J.
    Riaz, Nadeem
    Setton, Jeremy
    Koutcher, Lawrence
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Shi, Weiji
    Fury, Matthew G.
    Wolden, Suzanne L.
    Pfister, David G.
    Morris, Luc
    Lee, Nancy
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 50 (10) : 947 - 955
  • [28] Multi-institutional comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a planning study
    Andrea Holt
    Dirk Van Gestel
    Mark P Arends
    Erik W Korevaar
    Danny Schuring
    Martina C Kunze-Busch
    Rob JW Louwe
    Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij
    Radiation Oncology, 8
  • [29] A Phase 1 Study of Everolimus plus Weekly Cisplatin plus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Head-and-Neck Cancer
    Fury, Matthew G.
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    Sherman, Eric
    Ho, Alan L.
    Rao, Shyam
    Heguy, Adriana
    Shen, Ronglai
    Korte, Susan
    Lisa, Donna
    Ganly, Ian
    Patel, Snehal
    Wong, Richard J.
    Shaha, Ashok
    Shah, Jatin
    Haque, Sofia
    Katabi, Nora
    Pfister, David G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (03): : 479 - 486
  • [30] Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of cochlear-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy in patients with parotid cancer (COSTAR; CRUK/08/004)
    Nutting, Christopher M.
    Morden, James P.
    Beasley, Matthew
    Bhide, Shreerang
    Cook, Audrey
    De Winton, Emma
    Emson, Marie
    Evans, Mererid
    Fresco, Lydia
    Gollins, Simon
    Gujral, Dorothy
    Harrington, Kevin
    Joseph, Mano
    Lemon, Catherine
    Luxon, Linda
    van den Blink, Qurrat
    Mendes, Ruheena
    Miah, Aisha
    Newbold, Kate
    Prestwich, Robin
    Robinson, Martin
    Sanghera, Paul
    Simpson, Joanna
    Sivaramalingam, Muthiah
    Srihari, Narayanan Nair
    Sydenham, Mark
    Wells, Emma
    Witts, Stephanie
    Hall, Emma
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 103 : 249 - 258