Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression with Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Meta-Analysis

被引:0
作者
Chen, Yuxian [1 ]
Lin, Wei [1 ]
Lei, Shenglin [2 ]
You, Yawen [3 ]
Zhang, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Ma, Yingfei [1 ]
Wang, Dongping [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Clin Med Sch 1, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Shenzhen Clin Med Sch, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Clin Med Sch 5, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Lumbar degenerative diseases; Meta-analysis; Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression; Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression; DISC HERNIATION; DISKECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; COMPLICATIONS; STENOSIS; FUSION; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.093
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
- OBJECTIVE: Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression (UBED) offers the advantages of minimal tissue damage, operational flexibility, and clear visualization, positioning it as an innovative and minimally invasive endoscopic technique. Nevertheless, the clinical evidence supporting the use of UBED in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases is limited and conflicting. - METHODS: As of October 1, 2023, a comprehensive search was conducted across databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify all published studies on minimally invasive UBED for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Data pertaining to patient demographics, fluoroscopy time, operative duration, intraoperative hemorrhage, hospitalization length, visual analog scale (VAS) score for back and leg pain, MacNab criteria, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complication rates were extracted. The NewcastleOttawa scale was utilized to assess the quality.- RESULTS: Twelve articles were included, involving 816 patients. The back VAS score (95% confidence interval [CI]:-0.09-0.07, P = 0.75), MacNab criteria (95% CI: 0.522.3, P = 0.82), fluoroscopy time (95% CI:-7.03 to-0.4, P = 0.08), and the incidence of complications (95% CI: 0.51.73, P = 0.82) were not significantly different, while the leg VAS score (95% CI: 0.01-0.18, P = 0.03), ODI score (95% CI:-1.03 to-0.09, P = 0.02), operation time (95% CI: 5.7620.62, P = 0.0005), hospitalization length (95% CI: 0.41 2.76, P = 0.008), and intraoperative hemorrhage (95% CI: 21.92-72.44, P = 0.0003) were significantly different. - CONCLUSIONS: UBED offers superiority in ODI, flexibility, and visual field clarity. Conversely, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression presents advantages in terms of operation duration, blood loss, hospitalization length, and leg VAS score. These factors should be thoroughly considered when selecting a surgical approach.
引用
收藏
页码:E383 / E398
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar spinal canal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Wen, Bingtao
    Zhang, Xifeng
    Zhang, Lin
    Huang, Peng
    Zheng, Guoquan
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (50) : e5186
  • [22] Efficacy and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Liang, Jiachang
    Lian, Lirong
    Liang, Shaotian
    Zhao, Haibo
    Shu, Gao
    Chao, Jiwei
    Yuan, Chao
    Zhai, Mingyu
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 159 : E91 - E102
  • [23] Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis
    He, Yanxing
    Cheng, Qianyue
    She, Jiang
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [24] Decompression Alone Versus Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Zihao
    Xie, Peigen
    Feng, Feng
    Chhantyal, Kishor
    Yang, Yang
    Rong, Limin
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 111 : E158 - E170
  • [25] Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression
    Ruetten, Sebastian
    Komp, Martin
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 31 (01) : 25 - +
  • [26] Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective study
    Arunakul, Rattalerk
    Anumas, Suthiya
    Pattharanitima, Pattharawin
    Susrivaraput, Chananyu
    Pholsawatchai, Waroot
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [27] Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy compared with microscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Chuntao
    Ju, Fei
    Li, Wenyi
    Gao, Shangju
    Cao, Can
    Li, Changren
    He, Liang
    Ma, Xu
    Li, Meng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (50) : E27970
  • [28] Percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Ahn, Yong
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2014, 11 (06) : 605 - 616
  • [29] Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Xu
    Li, Wenyi
    Gao, Shangju
    Cao, Can
    Li, Chuntao
    He, Liang
    Li, Meng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (39) : E30412
  • [30] Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Hao
    Song, Yifan
    Li, Yiming
    Zhou, Hengcai
    Fu, Yufei
    Li, Jie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)