DNA shape features improve prediction of CRISPR/Cas9 activity

被引:3
|
作者
Vora, Dhvani Sandip [1 ]
Bhandari, Sakshi Manoj [2 ]
Sundar, Durai [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Biochem Engn & Biotechnol, New Delhi 110016, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Math, New Delhi 110016, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Sch Artificial Intelligence, New Delhi 110016, India
关键词
CRISPR/Cas9; Off-target; DNA shape; Neural networks; LIME; Permutation importance; OFF-TARGET CLEAVAGE; UNBIASED DETECTION; BINDING; CRISPR-CAS9; CAS9; SEQ; SPECIFICITY; DESIGN; RNA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.04.012
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology has transformed basic and translational research in biology and medicine. However, the advances are hindered by off -target effects and a paucity in the knowledge of the mechanism of the Cas9 protein. Machine learning models have been proposed for the prediction of Cas9 activity at unintended sites, yet feature engineering plays a major role in the outcome of the predictors. This study evaluates the improvement in the performance of similar predictors upon inclusion of epigenetic and DNA shape feature groups in the conventionally used sequence -based Cas9 target and off -target datasets. The approach involved the utilization of neural networks trained on a diverse range of parameters, allowing us to systematically assess the performance increase for the meticulously designed datasets- (i) sequence only, (ii) sequence and epigenetic features, and (iii) sequence, epigenetic and DNA shape feature datasets. The addition of DNA shape information significantly improved predictive performance, evaluated by Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. The evaluation of individual feature importance by permutation and LIMEbased methods also indicates that not only sequence features like mismatches and nucleotide composition, but also base pairing parameters like opening and stretch, that are indicative of distortion in the DNA -RNA hybrid in the presence of mismatches, influence model outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 126
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CRISPR/Cas9 Immune System as a Tool for Genome Engineering
    Hryhorowicz, Magdalena
    Lipianki, Daniel
    Zeyland, Joanna
    Slomski, Ryszard
    ARCHIVUM IMMUNOLOGIAE ET THERAPIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, 2017, 65 (03) : 233 - 240
  • [32] sgRNA Scorer 2.0: A Species-Independent Model To Predict CRISPR/Cas9 Activity
    Chari, Raj
    Yeo, Nan Cher
    Chavez, Alejandro
    Church, George M.
    ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY, 2017, 6 (05): : 902 - 904
  • [33] C-RNNCrispr: Prediction of CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA activity using convolutional and recurrent neural networks
    Zhang, Guishan
    Dai, Zhiming
    Dai, Xianhua
    COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 18 : 344 - 354
  • [34] Structure of Geobacillus stearothermophilus Cas9: Insights into the Catalytic Process and Thermostability of CRISPR-Cas9
    Shen, Panpan
    Zhang, Lilan
    Liu, Beibei
    Li, Xian
    Wang, Caihong
    Min, Jian
    Huang, Jian-Wen
    Chen, Chun-Chi
    Guo, Rey-Ting
    ACS CATALYSIS, 2024, 14 (17): : 13227 - 13235
  • [35] Patterns of CRISPR/Cas9 activity in plants, animals and microbes
    Bortesi, Luisa
    Zhu, Changfu
    Zischewski, Julia
    Perez, Lucia
    Bassie, Ludovic
    Nadi, Riad
    Forni, Giobbe
    Lade, Sarah Boyd
    Soto, Erika
    Jin, Xin
    Medina, Vicente
    Villorbina, Gemma
    Munoz, Pilar
    Farre, Gemma
    Fischer, Rainer
    Twyman, Richard M.
    Capell, Teresa
    Christou, Paul
    Schillberg, Stefan
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 14 (12) : 2203 - 2216
  • [36] A systematic mapping study on machine learning techniques for the prediction of CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA target cleavage
    Dimauro, Giovanni
    Barletta, Vita S.
    Catacchio, Claudia R.
    Colizzi, Lucio
    Maglietta, Rosalia
    Ventura, Mario
    COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 20 : 5813 - 5823
  • [37] Modulating CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing activity by small molecules
    Chen, Siwei
    Chen, Deng
    Liu, Bin
    Haisma, Hidde J.
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2022, 27 (04) : 951 - 966
  • [38] CRISPR/Cas9 Off-targets: Computational Analysis of Causes, Prediction, Detection, and Overcoming Strategies
    Roy, Roshan Kumar
    Debashree, Ipsita
    Srivastava, Sonal
    Rishi, Narayan
    Srivastava, Ashish
    CURRENT BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 17 (02) : 119 - 132
  • [39] Molecular biology at the cutting edge: A review on CRISPR/CAS9 gene editing for undergraduates
    Thurtle-Schmidt, Deborah M.
    Lo, Te-Wen
    BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2018, 46 (02) : 195 - 205
  • [40] CRISPR/Cas9 as a Mutagenic Factor
    Shumega, Andrey R.
    Pavlov, Youri I.
    Chirinskaite, Angelina V.
    Rubel, Aleksandr A.
    Inge-Vechtomov, Sergey G.
    Stepchenkova, Elena I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2024, 25 (02)