Approaches for Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)/Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) in brain metastases using different radiotherapy modalities (Feasibility study)

被引:1
作者
Tawfik, Zyad A. [1 ,2 ]
Farid, Mohamed El-Azab [2 ]
El Shahat, Khaled M. [3 ]
Hussein, Ahmed A. [2 ]
Al Etreby, Mostafa [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Inaya Med Coll, Radiol Sci Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Assiut Univ, Phys Dept, Fac Sci, Assiut, Egypt
[3] Al Azhar Univ, Radiat Oncol Dept, Fac Med, Cairo, Egypt
[4] Dr Soliman Fakeeh Hosp DSFH, Oncol Dept, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[5] Cairo Univ Hosp, Oncol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
SRS; SRT; linac-based SRS; brain metastases; Rapid Arc; IMRT; 3DCRT; VOLUMETRIC-MODULATED ARC; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; GAMMA-KNIFE; RAPIDARC; IMRT; QUALITY; 3DCRT; FIELD;
D O I
10.3233/XST-230275
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: SRS and SRT are precise treatments for brain metastases, delivering high doses while minimizing doses to nearby organs. Modern linear accelerators enable the precise delivery of SRS/SRT using different modalities like threedimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and Rapid Arc (RA). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare dosimetric differences and evaluate the effectiveness of 3DCRT, IMRT, and Rapid Arc techniques in SRS/SRT for brain metastases. METHODS: 10 patients with brain metastases, 3 patients assigned for SRT, and 7 patients for SRS. For each patient, 3 treatment plans were generated using the Eclipse treatment planning system using different treatment modalities. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed among the three techniques in the homogeneity index (HI), maximum D2%, and minimum D98% doses for the target, with a p > 0.05. The RA demonstrated a better conformity index of 1.14 +/- 0.25 than both IMRT 1.21 +/- 0.26 and 3DCRT 1.37 +/- 0.31. 3DCRT and IMRT had lower Gradient Index values compared to RA, suggesting that they achieved a better dose gradient than RA. The mean treatment time decreased by 26.2% and 10.3% for 3DCRT and RA, respectively, compared to IMRT. In organs at risk, 3DCRT had lower maximum doses than IMRT and RA, but some differences were not statistically significant. However, in the brain stem and brain tissues, RA exhibited lower maximum doses compared to IMRT and 3DCRT. Additionally, RA and IMRT had lower V15Gy, V12Gy, and V9Gy values compared to 3DCRT. CONCLUSION: While 3D-CRT delivered lower doses to organs at risk, RA and IMRT provided better conformity and target coverage. RA effectively controlled the maximum dose and irradiated volume of normal brain tissue. Overall, these findings indicate that 3DCRT, RA, and IMRT are suitable for treating brain metastases in SRS/SRT due to their improved dose conformity and target coverage while minimizing dose to healthy tissues.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 781
页数:17
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Volumetric-modulated arc therapy with RapidArc (R): An evaluation of treatment delivery efficiency [J].
Amendola, Beatriz E. ;
Amendola, Marco ;
Perez, Naipy ;
Iglesias, Alejandro ;
Wu, Xiaodong .
REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2013, 18 (06) :383-386
[2]  
Ammar H., 2014, International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology, V2, DOI [10.14319/ijcto.0204.2, DOI 10.14319/IJCTO.0204.2]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Journal of the ICRU, V10, DOI DOI 10.1093/JICRU/NDQ002
[4]   A comparative study of RapidArc and intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan quality for cervical cancer treatment [J].
Atiq, Atia ;
Atiq, Maria ;
Iqbal, Khalid ;
Sial, Manzar A. ;
Altaf, Saima ;
Shamsi, Quratul Ain ;
Buzdar, Saeed A. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 55 (01) :74-79
[5]   Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy vs. stereotactic conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of meningioma located predominantly in the skull base [J].
Baumert, BG ;
Norton, IA ;
Davis, JB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (02) :580-592
[6]   Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery compared with whole brain radiotherapy for resected metastatic brain disease (NCCTG N107C/CEC.3): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial [J].
Brown, Paul D. ;
Ballman, Karla V. ;
Cerhan, Jane H. ;
Anderson, S. Keith ;
Carrero, Xiomara W. ;
Whitton, Anthony C. ;
Greenspoon, Jeffrey ;
Parney, Ian F. ;
Laack, Nadia N. I. ;
Ashman, Jonathan B. ;
Bahary, Jean-Paul ;
Hadjipanayis, Costas G. ;
Urbanic, James J. ;
Barker, Fred G., II ;
Farace, Elana ;
Khuntia, Deepak ;
Giannini, Caterina ;
Buckner, Jan C. ;
Galanis, Evanthia ;
Roberge, David .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (08) :1049-1060
[7]   Dosimetric justification for the use of volumetric modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer-A systematic review of the literature [J].
Buciuman, Nikolett ;
Marcu, Loredana G. .
LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 6 (05) :999-1007
[8]  
By Chi Huang, 2012, Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases Using Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy: Comparison with Conventional Dynamic Conformal Arc and Static Beam Stereotactic Radiosurgery
[9]   A comparison of three stereotactic radiotherapy techniques; arcs vs. noncoplanar fixed fields vs. intensity modulation [J].
Cardinale, RM ;
Benedict, SH ;
Wu, QW ;
Zwicker, RD ;
Gaballa, HE ;
Mohan, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02) :431-436
[10]   Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a review with a physics perspective [J].
Cho, Byungchul .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 36 (01) :1-10