Accuracy of navigation guided implant surgery for immediate loading complete arch restorations: Prospective clinical trial

被引:4
作者
Pozzi, Alessandro [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Carosi, Paolo [1 ,5 ]
Laureti, Andrea [5 ]
Mattheos, Nikos [6 ,7 ]
Pimkhaokham, Atiphan [6 ]
Chow, James [8 ]
Arcuri, Lorenzo [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Clin Sci & Translat Med, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbo, MI USA
[3] Sci Augusta Univ, Dept Restorat, Augusta, GA USA
[4] Harvard Sch Dent Med, Dept Restorat Dent & Biomat Sci, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Chem Sci & Technol, Rome, Italy
[6] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Bangkok, Thailand
[7] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Brannemark Osseointegrat Ctr, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[9] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Odontostomatol & Maxillofacial Sci, Rome, Italy
关键词
accuracy; complete-arch; dental implants; dynamic navigation; guided surgery; immediate loading; DYNAMIC NAVIGATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; PLACEMENT; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13360
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess navigation accuracy for complete-arch implant placement with immediate loading of digitally prefabricated provisional. Materials and Methods: Consecutive edentulous and terminal dentition patients requiring at least one complete-arch FDP were treated between December 2020 and January 2022. Accuracy was evaluated by superimposing pre-operative and post-operative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), recording linear (mm) and angular (degrees) deviations. T-tests were performed to investigate the potential effect of the registration algorithm (fiducial-based vs. fiducial-free), type of references for the fiducial-free algorithm (teeth vs. bone screws), site characteristic (healed vs. post-extractive), implant angulation (axial vs. tilted), type of arch (maxilla vs. mandible) on the accuracy with p-value <0.05. Results: Twenty-five patients, 36 complete-arches, and 161 implants were placed. The overall mean angular deviation was 2.19 degrees (SD 1.26 degrees). The global platform and apex mean deviations were 1.17 mm (SD 0.57 mm), and 1.30 mm (SD 0.62 mm). Meaningful global platform (p = 0.0009) and apical (p = 0.0109) deviations were experienced only between healed and post-extraction sites. None of the analyzed variables significantly influenced angular deviation. Minor single-axis deviations were reported for the type of jaw (y-axis at implant platform and apex), registration algorithm (y-axis platform and z-axis deviations), and type of references for the fiducial-free algorithm. No statistically significant differences were found in relation to implant angulation. Conclusions: Within the study limitations navigation was reliable for complete-arch implant placement with immediate loading digitally pre-fabricated FDP. AI-driven surface anatomy identification and calibration protocol made fiducial-free registration as accurate as fiducial-based, teeth and bone screws equal as references. Implant site characteristics were the only statistically significant variable with healed sites reporting higher accuracy compared to post-extractive. Live-tracked navigation surgery enhanced operator performance and accuracy regardless of implant angulation and type of jaw. A mean safety room of about 1 mm and 2 degrees should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:954 / 971
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Accuracy of Two Stereolithographic Guide Systems for Computer-Aided Implant Placement: A Computed Tomography-Based Clinical Comparative Study
    Arisan, Volkan
    Karabuda, Z. Cuneyt
    Ozdemir, Tayfun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2010, 81 (01) : 43 - 51
  • [2] Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial
    Aydemir, Ceyda Aktolun
    Arisan, Volkan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (03) : 255 - 263
  • [3] Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation
    Block, Michael S.
    Emery, Robert W.
    Lank, Kathryn
    Ryan, James
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [4] Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance
    Block, Michael S.
    Emery, Robert W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (02) : 269 - 277
  • [5] Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Flapless Implant Placement by Means of Mucosa-Supported Templates in Complete-Arch Restorations: A Systematic Review
    Carosi, Paolo
    Lorenzi, Claudia
    Lio, Fabrizio
    Cardelli, Pierluigi
    Pinto, Alessandro
    Laureti, Andrea
    Pozzi, Alessandro
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (04)
  • [6] International Organization for Standardization ISO/IEC TR 24028, 2020, INFORM TECHNOLOGY AR
  • [7] Comparison of the accuracy of implant position among freehand implant placement, static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: a non- randomized prospective study
    Jaemsuwan, S.
    Arunjaroensuk, S.
    Kaboosaya, B.
    Subbalekha, K.
    Mattheos, N.
    Pimkhaokham, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 52 (02) : 264 - 271
  • [8] The virtual patient in dental medicine
    Joda, Tim
    Gallucci, German O.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (06) : 725 - 726
  • [9] Systematic Literature Review of Digital Three-Dimensional Superimposition Techniques to Create Virtual Dental Patients
    Joda, Tim
    Braegger, Urs
    Gallucci, German
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (02) : 330 - 337
  • [10] Bruxism and prosthetic treatment: A critical review
    Johansson, Anders
    Omar, Ridwaan
    Carlsson, Gunnar E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2011, 55 (03) : 127 - 136