Bioelectrical Impedance Phase Angle Value and Prolongations of PR and Corrected QT Intervals in Patients Undergoing Dialysis

被引:0
作者
Shibata, Masanori [1 ,2 ]
Asai, Kazuaki [1 ,2 ]
Nagai, Kojiro [3 ]
Taniguchi, Shinkichi [4 ]
机构
[1] Japan Assoc Clin Engineers, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Koujukai Rehabil Hosp, Dept Hemodialysis, Kita, Nagoya, Japan
[3] Shizuoka Prefectural Gen Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Shizuoka, Japan
[4] Wakayama Med Univ, Dept Dermatol, Wakayama, Japan
关键词
Hemodialysis; Bioelectrical impedance analysis; Phase angle value; PR interval; Corrected QT interval; BODY-COMPOSITION; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; OUTCOMES; ASSOCIATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1159/000538305
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Phase angle value, derived from bioelectrical impedance analysis, represents the body cell mass and nutritional status of patients undergoing hemodialysis. Although the phase angle value has clinical significance in these patients, its relationship with electrocardiogram (ECG), another clinically relevant bioelectrical examination, has not yet been well clarified. Methods: Two hundred and twenty-four patients undergoing dialysis (80 females and 144 males; mean +/- SD, 72.2 +/- 12.0 years old; 117 diabetic and 107 nondiabetic patients) were studied retrospectively. Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis was performed immediately after the end of dialysis therapy. The phase shift was geometrically converted into a phase angle value. The ECG was recorded simultaneously, and the upper limits of the PR interval, QRS width, and corrected QT interval (QTc) were set at 0.20, 0.12, and 0.44 s, respectively. The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), a representative nutritional index, was also determined. In addition, we examined the incidence of cardiac events, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, cardiac revascularization procedure, cardiac arrhythmia, and cardiac death, or all-cause death. Results: Of 224 patients undergoing dialysis, the prolongation of the PR interval, QRS width, and QTc was found in 30.7, 17.4, and 62.1%, respectively. The prevalence of QTc prolongation was higher in females and diabetic patients than in males and nondiabetic patients. An inverse relationship between phase angle value and QTc was observed only in males and nondiabetic patients. The relationships of GNRI both with phase angle value and QTc were stronger in males and nondiabetic patients. In addition, PR interval was inversely correlated with a phase angle value only in nondiabetic patients. No significant correlation was found between phase angle value and QRS width. Five-year survival probability for the composite endpoints was significantly worse in patients with lower phase angle values. QTc prolongation was associated with survival in males and nondiabetic patients. Prolonged PR was associated with survival in nondiabetic patients. Discussion: Relationships between phase angle value and ECG findings were demonstrated in patients undergoing dialysis, especially in males and nondiabetic patients. Although the phase angle value has been considered as an index for evaluating nutritional status, another clinical application of phase angle value in predicting cardiac complications seems to be useful.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 226
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[41]   Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Derived-Phase Angle as a Pragmatic Tool to Detect Protein Energy Wasting among Multi-Ethnic Hemodialysis Patients [J].
Lim, Cordelia-Kheng-May ;
Lim, Jun-Hao ;
Ibrahim, Imliya ;
Chan, Yoke-Mun ;
Zakaria, Nor Fadhlina ;
Yahya, Rosnawati ;
Daud, Zulfitri Azuan Mat .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (10)
[42]   Phase angle and extracellular water-to-total body water ratio estimated by bioelectrical impedance analysis are associated with levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit in patients with diabetes [J].
Hori, Taiki ;
Nakamura, Shingen ;
Yamagami, Hiroki ;
Yasui, Saya ;
Hosoki, Minae ;
Hara, Tomoyo ;
Mitsui, Yukari ;
Masuda, Shiho ;
Kurahashi, Kiyoe ;
Yoshida, Sumiko ;
Harada, Takeshi ;
Kuroda, Akio ;
Otoda, Toshiki ;
Yuasa, Tomoyuki ;
Endo, Itsuro ;
Matsuhisa, Munehide ;
Abe, Masahiro ;
Aihara, Ken-ichi .
HELIYON, 2023, 9 (04)
[43]   Bioelectrical impedance phase angle and subjective global assessment in detecting malnutrition among newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients [J].
Teresa Małecka-Massalska ;
Radoslaw Mlak ;
Agata Smolen ;
Kamal Morshed .
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2016, 273 :1299-1305
[44]   Bioelectrical impedance phase angle and subjective global assessment in detecting malnutrition among newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients [J].
Malecka-Massalska, Teresa ;
Mlak, Radoslaw ;
Smolen, Agata ;
Morshed, Kamal .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 273 (05) :1299-1305
[45]   Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis-derived phase angle predicts survival in patients with systemic immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis [J].
Caccialanza, Riccardo ;
Cereda, Emanuele ;
Klersy, Catherine ;
Milani, Paolo ;
Cappello, Silvia ;
Martinelli, Valentina ;
Turri, Annalisa ;
Basset, Marco ;
Borioli, Valeria ;
Nuvolone, Mario ;
Caraccia, Marilisa ;
Lavatelli, Francesca ;
Masi, Sara ;
Lobascio, Federica ;
Foli, Andrea ;
Merlini, Giampaolo ;
Palladini, Giovanni .
AMYLOID-JOURNAL OF PROTEIN FOLDING DISORDERS, 2020, 27 (03) :168-173
[46]   The combination of phase angle and age has a good diagnostic value for sarcopenia in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients [J].
Chen, Ye ;
Wu, Jinlan ;
Ran, Lei ;
Yu, Dan ;
Chen, Xi ;
Liu, Maodong .
FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2022, 9
[47]   Bioelectrical impedance analysis-derived phase angle as a determinant of protein-energy wasting and frailty in maintenance hemodialysis patients: retrospective cohort study [J].
Masakazu Saitoh ;
Masumi Ogawa ;
Hisae Kondo ;
Kiichi Suga ;
Tetsuya Takahashi ;
Haruki Itoh ;
Yoichiro Tabata .
BMC Nephrology, 21
[48]   Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis remains an independent predictive marker in HIV-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral treatment [J].
Schwenk, A ;
Beisenherz, A ;
Römer, K ;
Kremer, G ;
Salzberger, B ;
Elia, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2000, 72 (02) :496-501