Efficacy, safety, and advantages of magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection vs conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection: A retrospective paired cohort study

被引:0
作者
Li, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Guifang [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Xinlan [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Feng [3 ]
Lv, Yi [3 ,4 ]
He, Shuixiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ren, Mudan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastroenterol, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Shaanxi Clin Res Ctr Digest Dis, Canc Div, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Natl & Local Joint Engn Res Ctr Precis Surg & Rege, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Magnetic anchor guided; Traction; EARLY GASTRIC-CANCER; S-O CLIP; TRACTION DEVICE; GRAVITY; TRIAL; ESD;
D O I
10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.009
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been recommended as the first -line treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). However, poor visualization of the operative field increases both the procedure time and the risk of complications, especially for large and difficult lesions. We introduced a novel technique, magnetic anchor-guided ESD (MAG-ESD) and compared it with conventional ESD (C-ESD) for the treatment of large EGCs in terms of efficacy, safety, and advantages. Methods: Patients with large EGCs who underwent MAG-ESD or C-ESD at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from March 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The patients in the MAG-ESD cohort were matched to those in the C-ESD cohort using propensity score-based matching. The operation time, submucosal dissection time, complete resection status, magnetic anchor, adverse event rate, and tumor recurrence rate were evaluated. Results: Twenty-two patients who underwent MAG-ESD were ultimately matched to those who underwent C-ESD. The median operation time of MAG-ESD and C-ESD was 43 minutes (IQR, 35.2-49.5) and 50.5 minutes (IQR, 42.0-76.0), respectively, among which the submucosal dissection time was 7.6 minutes (IQR, 5.2-10.4) and 14.8 minutes (IQR, 10.8-19.6), respectively. The operation time of MAG-ESD was shorter than that of CESD, especially the submucosal dissection time ( P < .05). There was a lower incidence of adverse events associated with MAG-ESD ( P < .05) when magnetic anchors were successfully placed and retrieved. Conclusion: MAG-ESD is feasible, effective, safe, and simple for the treatment of large EGCs at different sites and has a high anchor success rate, which could shorten the operation time and reduce the adverse event rate. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 401
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions using the "yo-yo technique" [J].
Baldaque-Silva, F. ;
Vilas-Boas, F. ;
Velosa, M. ;
Macedo, G. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 45 (03) :218-221
[2]   Advanced endoscopic submucosal dissection with magnetic bead-assisted traction based on gravity for a flat colorectal neoplasm with severe fibrosis [J].
Bethge, Johannes ;
Ye, Liansong ;
Ellrichmann, Mark ;
Khan, Naveed ;
Feng, Zhe ;
Schreiber, Stefan ;
Hu, Bing .
ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 50 (08) :824-825
[3]   Magnetic Liver Retraction: an Incision-Less Approach for Less Invasive Bariatric Surgery [J].
Davis, Matthew ;
Davalos, Gerardo ;
Ortega, Camila ;
Chen, Sugong ;
Schimpke, Scott ;
Jain-Spangler, Kunoor ;
Yoo, Jin ;
Seymour, Keri ;
Sudan, Ranjan ;
Portenier, Dana ;
Guerron, Alfredo D. .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 (03) :1068-1073
[4]   Efficacy and safety of an internal magnet traction device for endoscopic submucosal dissection: ex vivo study in a porcine model (with video) [J].
Dobashi, Akira ;
Storm, Andrew C. ;
Song, Louis M. Wong Kee ;
Gostout, Christopher J. ;
Deters, Jodie L. ;
Miller, Charles A. ;
Knipschield, Mary A. ;
Rajan, Elizabeth .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (02) :663-668
[5]   AGA Institute Clinical Practice Update: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States [J].
Draganov, Peter V. ;
Wang, Andrew Y. ;
Othman, Mohamed O. ;
Fukami, Norio .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 17 (01) :16-+
[6]   Double-endoscope assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for treating tumors in rectum and distal colon by expert endoscopists: a feasibility study [J].
Ebigbo, A. ;
Tziatzios, G. ;
Goelder, S. K. ;
Probst, A. ;
Messmann, H. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (12) :1293-1299
[7]  
[樊茜 Fan Qian], 2020, [中华普通外科杂志, Chinese Journal of General Surgery], V35, P49
[8]   Endoscopic mucosal resection with a magnetic traction system: a new strategy to facilitate complete resection [J].
Figueiredo, Mariana ;
Yzet, Clara ;
Lafeuille, Pierre ;
Ponchon, Thierry ;
Jacques, Jeremie ;
Rivory, Jerome ;
Pioche, Mathieu .
ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 54 :E820-E821
[9]   What we want for ESD is a second hand! Traction method [J].
Fukami, Norio .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 78 (02) :274-276
[10]   Prospective clinical trial of magnetic-anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for large early gastric cancer (with videos) [J].
Gotoda, Takuji ;
Oda, Ichiro ;
Tamakawa, Katsunori ;
Ueda, Hirohisa ;
Kobayashi, Toshiaki ;
Kakizoe, Tadao .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (01) :10-15