Reliability of mandibular range of motion measurements in healthy children

被引:0
|
作者
de Sonnaville, Willemijn F. C. [1 ]
Steenks, Michel H. [1 ]
Verkouteren, Daan R. C. [1 ]
Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A. [2 ]
Wulffraat, Nico M. [3 ]
Rosenberg, Antoine J. W. P. [1 ]
Speksnijder, Caroline M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Special Dent Care, Heidelberglaan 100,POB 85500, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Wilhelmina Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Rheumatol & Immunol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
children; mouth opening; range of motion; reliability; reproducibility; temporomandibular joint; SMALLEST DETECTABLE DIFFERENCE; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1111/joor.13782
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundMandibular range of motion (MROM) variables are widely used to evaluate oral function.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to establish the reliability of MROM variables in healthy children.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, healthy children were examined 2 weeks apart. The following MROM variables were established: active maximum interincisal opening (AMIO), passive maximum interincisal opening (PMIO), protrusion and left and right laterotrusion. The reliability of the MROM measurements was determined by analysing the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC) and limits of agreement (LoA).ResultsA total of 167 healthy children were examined. The ICC indicated good reliability for AMIO (0.885); excellent reliability for PMIO (0.925); and moderate reliability for protrusion (0.578), laterotrusion left (0.601) and laterotrusion right (0.634). The SDC was 0.9 mm for AMIO, 0.4 mm for PMIO, 2.2 mm for protrusion, 1.6 mm for laterotrusion left and 1.4 mm for laterotrusion right. The LoA was -5.67 to 5.82 for AMIO, -3.90 to 3.57 for PMIO, -3.89 to 3.55 for protrusion, -2.99 to 2.77 for laterotrusion left, and - 2.71 to 2.77 for laterotrusion right.ConclusionsAMIO and PMIO measurements are both highly reliable in healthy children. The low SDC indicate that AMIO and PMIO are promising longitudinal measurements. Protrusion and laterotrusion measurements had moderate reliability. These results support our clinical recommendation to measure AMIO rather than PMIO, as PMIO is more difficult and more time-consuming to perform than AMIO. Graphical abstract illustrating the reliability of mandibular range of motion in healthy children.image
引用
收藏
页码:1973 / 1980
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RELIABILITY OF MEASUREMENTS OF CERVICAL-SPINE RANGE OF MOTION COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS - COMMENTARY
    RIDDLE, DL
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1991, 71 (02): : 105 - 106
  • [32] Design and validation of an instrument package designed to increase the reliability of ankle range of motion measurements
    Weaver, K. (Joseph.Czerniecki@med.VA.gov), 2001, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (38):
  • [33] Design and validation of an instrument package designed to increase the reliability of ankle range of motion measurements
    Weaver, K
    Price, R
    Czerniecki, J
    Sangeorzan, B
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 38 (05): : 471 - 475
  • [34] RELIABILITY OF GONIOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS AND VISUAL ESTIMATES OF KNEE RANGE OF MOTION OBTAINED IN A CLINICAL SETTING
    WATKINS, MA
    RIDDLE, DL
    LAMB, RL
    PERSONIUS, WJ
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1991, 71 (02): : 90 - 96
  • [35] RANGE-OF-MOTION MEASUREMENTS
    LEA, RD
    GERHARDT, JJ
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1995, 77A (05): : 784 - 798
  • [36] Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants
    Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
    Nicolas Boutin
    Alexandre M Dion
    Carol-Anne Vallée
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 10
  • [37] Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants
    Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick
    Boutin, Nicolas
    Dion, Alexandre M.
    Vallee, Carol-Anne
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 10
  • [38] Reliability and validity of a Coda Motion 3-D Analysis system for measuring cervical range of motion in healthy subjects
    Song, Hui
    Zhai, Xu
    Gao, Zhongyang
    Lu, Teng
    Tian, Qian
    Li, Haopeng
    He, Xijing
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2018, 38 : 56 - 66
  • [39] The passive range of motion of healthy shoulders
    Anetzberger, Hermann
    Lipold, Florian
    Birkenmaier, Christof
    Imhoff, Andreas B.
    Lorenz, Stephan
    OBERE EXTREMITAET-SCHULTER-ELLENBOGEN-HAND-UPPER EXTREMITY-SHOULDER ELBOW HAND, 2013, 8 (04): : 212 - 219
  • [40] Ratio between vertical and horizontal mandibular range of motion
    Dijkstra, PU
    Kropmans, TJB
    Stegenga, B
    De Bont, LGM
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1998, 25 (05) : 353 - 357