Volatility dynamics of agricultural futures markets under uncertainties

被引:3
作者
Dutta, Anupam [1 ]
Uddin, Gazi Salah [2 ]
Sheng, Lin Wen [3 ]
Park, Donghyun [4 ]
Zhu, Xuening [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vaasa, Sch Accounting & Finance, Vaasa, Finland
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Shanghai Univ, SILC Business Sch, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Asian Dev Bank, Mandaluyong, Philippines
[5] Fudan Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Agricultural futures markets; Realized volatility; Crude oil volatility; Geopolitical risk; Economic policy uncertainty; VIX; CRUDE-OIL PRICES; REALIZED VOLATILITY; STOCK-MARKET; IMPLIED VOLATILITY; FOOD-PRICES; MODEL; IMPACT; SPILLOVERS; FORECAST; BIOFUELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107754
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to examine the effect of various uncertainty measures on the realized volatility of agricultural futures markets. In doing so, we use a range of uncertainty indicators in our analysis to investigate whether news-based uncertainty measures (e.g., geopolitical risk and economic policy uncertainty) have better predictive contents than the market-based uncertainty measures (e.g., crude oil volatility index, the US equity market VIX and exchange rate VIX). This comparison is important given that employing both measures has some specific benefits. Methodologically, we consider the application of the LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) method as well as the heterogenous autoregressive (HAR) process. The in-sample estimates indicate that among the various news-based and market-based risk measures the latter provide better forecasts for the realized volatility of agricultural futures markets. The out-of-sample forecasts also confirm the same with the LASSO method outperforming the HAR process.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Adam P., 2016, INT J ENERGY EC POL, V6, P266
[2]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[3]   Roughing it up: Including jump components in the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of return volatility [J].
Andersen, Torben G. ;
Bollerslev, Tim ;
Diebold, Francis X. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2007, 89 (04) :701-720
[4]   A reduced form framework for modeling volatility of speculative prices based on realized variation measures [J].
Andersen, Torben G. ;
Bollerslev, Tim ;
Huang, Xin .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2011, 160 (01) :176-189
[5]   Geopolitical risks and the oil-stock nexus over 1899-2016 [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Kollias, Christos ;
Papadamou, Stephanos .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 23 :165-173
[6]   Do oil price increases cause higher food prices? [J].
Baumeister, Christiane ;
Kilian, Lutz .
ECONOMIC POLICY, 2014, 29 (80) :691-747
[7]   Periodic autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity [J].
Bollerslev, T ;
Ghysels, E .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1996, 14 (02) :139-151
[8]   The role of implied volatility in forecasting future realized volatility and jumps in foreign exchange, stock, and bond markets [J].
Busch, Thomas ;
Christensen, Bent Jesper ;
Nielsen, Morten Orregaard .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2011, 160 (01) :48-57
[9]   How economic policy uncertainty affects asymmetric spillovers in food and oil prices: Evidence from wavelet analysis [J].
Cao, Yan ;
Cheng, Sheng ;
Li, Xinran .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 86
[10]   Forecasting the realized variance of oil-price returns using machine learning: Is there a role for US state-level uncertainty? [J].
Cepni, Oguzhan ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Pienaar, Daniel ;
Pierdzioch, Christian .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 114