Navigating natural product-related patents in Australia and beyond

被引:0
作者
Gregg, Claire [1 ]
Caine, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Davies Collison Cave, Level 15,1 Nicholson St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
关键词
innovation; intellectual property; natural products; patents;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The field of natural products chemistry is ripe with innovation that underpins a broad range of industries. Patents are critical to incentivising the investment needed to drive this innovation and there is surprisingly broad scope to protect natural product-related inventions using patents. However, the patent process can be difficult to navigate and recent developments in case law, particularly in the United States (USA), have introduced further complexities into the patent system that undermine innovation in the natural products space. While steps are being taken to address these issues, we outline the requirements for patent eligibility in Australia, the US and Europe, and discuss the different aspects of natural products chemistry that may be considered patentable, to assist readers in navigating the current complexities of seeking patent protection.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 417
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1959, National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents
[2]  
[Anonymous], Australian Patent, Patent No. 2020202064
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Newton v. Am. Debt Servs., Inc.
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Spicer Spicer Pty Ltd. v The CocaCola Company & PureCircle Sdn Bhd
[5]  
[Anonymous], Australian Patent, Patent No. 2012356229
[6]  
[Anonymous], United States Patent, Patent No. [5,955,422, 5955422]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Hood v Bush Pharmacy Pty Ltd
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc
[9]  
[Anonymous], United States Patent, Patent No. 2686750
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Peugh v. United States