Effect of the atomic structure of complexions on the active disconnection mode during shear-coupled grain boundary motion

被引:4
作者
Pemma, Swetha [1 ]
Janisch, Rebecca [2 ]
Dehm, Gerhard [1 ]
Brink, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Eisenforsch GmbH, Max Planck Str 1, D-40237 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Interdisciplinary Ctr Adv Mat Simulat ICAMS, D-44780 Bochum, Germany
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS | 2024年 / 8卷 / 06期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
ELASTIC BAND METHOD; MEDIATED PLASTICITY; NANOCRYSTALLINE ALUMINUM; PHASE-TRANSFORMATION; SYMMETRIC TILT; MIGRATION; DEFORMATION; DISLOCATION; TRANSITIONS; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.063602
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The migration of grain boundaries leads to grain growth in polycrystals and is one mechanism of grainboundary-mediated plasticity, especially in nanocrystalline metals. This migration is due to the movement of dislocationlike defects, called disconnections, which couple to externally applied shear stresses. While this has been studied in detail in recent years, the active disconnection mode was typically associated with specific macroscopic grain boundary parameters. We know, however, that varying microscopic degrees of freedom can lead to different atomic structures without changing the macroscopic parameters. These structures can transition into each other and are called complexions. Here, we investigate [111] symmetric tilt boundaries in fcc metals, where two complexions-dubbed domino and pearl-were observed before. We compare these two complexions for two different misorientations: In E19b [111] (178) boundaries, both complexions exhibit the same disconnection mode. The critical stress for nucleation and propagation of disconnections is nevertheless different for domino and pearl. At low temperatures, the Peierls-like barrier for disconnection propagation dominates, while at higher temperatures the nucleation is the limiting factor. For E7 [111] (145) boundaries, we observed a larger difference. The domino and pearl complexions migrate in different directions under the same boundary conditions. While both migration directions are possible crystallographically, an analysis of the complexions' structural motifs and the disconnection core structures reveals that the choice of disconnection mode and therefore migration direction is directly due to the atomic structure of the grain boundary.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] Mechanically enhanced grain boundary structural phase transformation in Cu
    Aramfard, Mohammad
    Deng, Chuang
    [J]. ACTA MATERIALIA, 2018, 146 : 304 - 313
  • [2] Measuring anisotropy in Young's modulus of copper using microcantilever testing
    Armstrong, David E. J.
    Wilkinson, Angus J.
    Roberts, Steve G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2009, 24 (11) : 3268 - 3276
  • [3] BOUNDARY DEFECTS, AND ATOMISTIC ASPECTS OF BOUNDARY SLIDING AND DIFFUSIONAL CREEP
    ASHBY, MF
    [J]. SURFACE SCIENCE, 1972, 31 (01) : 498 - &
  • [4] Bollmann W., 1970, Crystal Defects and Crystalline Interfaces, P143
  • [5] Universality of grain boundary phases in fcc metals: Case study on high-angle [111] symmetric tilt grain boundaries
    Brink, Tobias
    Langenohl, Lena
    Bishara, Hanna
    Dehm, Gerhard
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2023, 107 (05)
  • [6] Coupling grain boundary motion to shear deformation
    Cahn, John W.
    Mishin, Yuri
    Suzuki, Akira
    [J]. ACTA MATERIALIA, 2006, 54 (19) : 4953 - 4975
  • [7] TRANSITIONS AND PHASE-EQUILIBRIA AMONG GRAIN-BOUNDARY STRUCTURES
    CAHN, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE, 1982, 43 (NC-6): : 199 - 213
  • [8] A unified approach to motion of grain boundaries, relative tangential translation along grain boundaries, and grain rotation
    Cahn, JW
    Taylor, JE
    [J]. ACTA MATERIALIA, 2004, 52 (16) : 4887 - 4898
  • [9] Grain-boundary shear-migration coupling. II. Geometrical model for general boundaries
    Caillard, D.
    Mompiou, F.
    Legros, M.
    [J]. ACTA MATERIALIA, 2009, 57 (08) : 2390 - 2402
  • [10] Grain Boundary Complexion Transitions
    Cantwell, Patrick R.
    Frolov, Timofey
    Rupert, Timothy J.
    Krause, Amanda R.
    Marvel, Christopher J.
    Rohrer, Gregory S.
    Rickman, Jeffrey M.
    Harmer, Martin P.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, VOL 50, 2020, 2020, 50 : 465 - 492