Bayesian Structure Learning for Climate Model Evaluation

被引:0
作者
OKane, Terence J. [1 ]
Harries, Dylan [2 ]
Collier, Mark A. [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Environm, Battery Point, Tas, Australia
[2] South Australian Hlth & Med Res Inst SAHMRI, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] CSIRO Environm, Aspendale, Vic, Australia
关键词
Bayesian inference; climate modeling; bias estimation; NCEP-NCAR REANALYSES; SOUTHERN-HEMISPHERE; GEOPOTENTIAL HEIGHT; ATMOSPHERIC TELECONNECTIONS; GRAPHICAL MODELS; CIRCULATION; OSCILLATION; TEMPERATURE; NETWORKS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1029/2023MS004034
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A Bayesian structure learning approach is employed to compare and contrast interactions between the major climate teleconnections over the recent past as revealed in reanalyses and climate model simulations from leading Meteorological Centers. In a previous study, the authors demonstrated a general framework using homogeneous Dynamic Bayesian Network models constructed from reanalyzed time series of empirical climate indices to compare probabilistic graphical models. Reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo is used to provide uncertainty quantification for selecting the respective network structures. The incorporation of confidence measures in structural features provided by the Bayesian approach is key to yielding informative measures of the differences between products if network-based approaches are to be used for model evaluation, particularly as point estimates alone may understate the relevant uncertainties. Here we compare models fitted from the NCEP/NCAR and JRA-55 reanalyses and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project version 5 (CMIP5) historical simulations in terms of associations for which there is high posterior confidence. Examination of differences in the posterior probabilities assigned to edges of the directed acyclic graph provides a quantitative summary of departures in the CMIP5 models from reanalyses. In general terms the climate model simulations are in better agreement with reanalyses where tropical processes dominate, and autocorrelation time scales are long. Seasonal effects are shown to be important when examining tropical-extratropical interactions with the greatest discrepancies and largest uncertainties present for the Southern Hemisphere teleconnections. Climate model biases and performance is typically assessed against observational products via systematic comparison of individual metrics, usually focused on the mean climate, over the recent historical period. We demonstrate how Bayesian structure learning can enable a systematic probabilistic framework for process-based model evaluation of both the temporal behavior of individual climate modes but also to identify and assess the teleconnections between those modes. We show that network structures can be fitted simultaneously and feasibly across a representative sample of climate model simulations affording uncertainty estimation of the robustness of differences across models and observations and robustly identify model biases between teleconnections in the climate. Bayesian structure learning is used to quantify uncertainty in estimated network structures describing climate mode teleconnections Dynamic Bayesian networks estimated from reanalyses are compared to CMIP5 model simulations over the historical period Differences in network structures between models and reanalyses quantify complex interacting biases in climate model dynamics
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 133 条
  • [1] Arnold A, 2007, KDD-2007 PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, P66
  • [2] Local Atmosphere-Ocean Predictability: Dynamical Origins, Lead Times, and Seasonality
    Bach, Eviatar
    Motesharrei, Safa
    Kalnay, Eugenia
    Ruiz-Barradas, Alfredo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2019, 32 (21) : 7507 - 7519
  • [3] Understanding causation via correlations and linear response theory
    Baldovin, Marco
    Cecconi, Fabio
    Vulpiani, Angelo
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2020, 2 (04):
  • [4] BARNSTON AG, 1987, MON WEATHER REV, V115, P1083, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<1083:CSAPOL>2.0.CO
  • [5] 2
  • [6] Response-Guided Community Detection: Application to Climate Index Discovery
    Bello, Gonzalo A.
    Angus, Michael
    Pedemane, Navya
    Harlalka, Jitendra K.
    Semazzi, Fredrick H. M.
    Kumar, Vipin
    Samatova, Nagiza F.
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY IN DATABASES, ECML PKDD 2015, PT II, 2015, 9285 : 736 - 751
  • [7] The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M - Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate
    Bentsen, M.
    Bethke, I.
    Debernard, J. B.
    Iversen, T.
    Kirkevag, A.
    Seland, O.
    Drange, H.
    Roelandt, C.
    Seierstad, I. A.
    Hoose, C.
    Kristjansson, J. E.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 6 (03) : 687 - 720
  • [8] The ACCESS coupled model: description, control climate and evaluation
    Bi, Daohua
    Dix, Martin
    Marsland, Simon J.
    O'Farrell, Siobhan
    Rashid, Harun A.
    Uotila, Petteri
    Hirst, Anthony C.
    Kowalczyk, Eva
    Golebiewski, Maciej
    Sullivan, Arnold
    Yan, Hailin
    Hannah, Nicholas
    Franklin, Charmaine
    Sun, Zhian
    Vohralik, Peter
    Watterson, Ian
    Zhou, Xiaobing
    Fiedler, Russell
    Collier, Mark
    Ma, Yimin
    Noonan, Julie
    Stevens, Lauren
    Uhe, Peter
    Zhu, Hongyan
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    Hill, Richard
    Harris, Chris
    Puri, Kamal
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEANOGRAPHIC JOURNAL, 2013, 63 (01) : 41 - 64
  • [9] BJERKNES J, 1969, MON WEATHER REV, V97, P163, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1969)097<0163:ATFTEP>2.3.CO
  • [10] 2