Towards a Holistic Perspective on Future Transportation Systems: A Swedish Case and a Conceptual Framework

被引:1
作者
Grosse, Christine [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mid Sweden Univ, Risk & Crisis Res Ctr, Dept Informat Syst & Technol, S-85170 Sundsvall, Sweden
[2] Abo Akad Univ, Fac Social Sci Business & Econ, Turku 20100, Finland
来源
FUTURE TRANSPORTATION | 2022年 / 2卷 / 04期
关键词
transportation; transport policy; critical infrastructure; complex systems; soft systems methodology; SSM; policy process; agenda setting; public administration; governance; INFRASTRUCTURE; GOVERNANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; SPACE;
D O I
10.3390/futuretransp2040047
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Critical infrastructure systems-such as transportation-are the backbone of society. Infrastructure development can thus be acknowledged as a common societal concern in the field of governance, and its recognition as a policy problem is crucial to proper decision making. This study aims to build an in-depth understanding of the multi-level system concerned with transportation and applies a soft systems methodology to structure the investigation. The system analysis and conceptual modelling rests on publicly available documents and policies, group meetings and a workshop with stakeholders from the local, regional and national levels. The paper provides a thorough analysis of the Swedish transportation system through public policy and the perceptions of municipal officials. In addition, it proposes a novel conceptual framework of the transportation system, including a detailed discussion of stakeholders, activities and perspectives. Although transportation is vital for many stakeholders, improving only transport infrastructure does not guarantee regional growth. Therefore, the proposed framework constitutes a novel basis for constructive dialogue among concerned parties regarding improvements to transportation. Thereby, the paper provides an understanding of a society's transportation system that can be used to inform agenda setting for critical infrastructure governance. Further discussion in the scientific community and with officials entrusted with public administration could further validate and deepen the proposed understanding of the perspectives and constraints in the examined context and beyond.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 867
页数:22
相关论文
共 95 条
[11]   SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT APPRAISALS USING STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT AND MCDA [J].
Barfod, Michael Bruhn .
TRANSPORT, 2018, 33 (04) :1052-1066
[12]  
Bergvall-Kreborn B., 2002, A Multi-Modal Approach to Soft Systems Methodology: Dissertation
[13]  
Birkland TA, 2007, PUBLIC ADM PUBLIC PO, V125, P63
[14]  
Blomquist C., 2002, Drmmar om Framtiden: Beslut Kring Infrastruktur
[15]  
Cars G., 2009, Bana vg fr Infrastruktur: Effektivisering av Planeringsprocessen fr Infrastrukturprojekt
[16]  
Checkland P, 2000, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V17, pS11, DOI 10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::AID-SRES374>3.0.CO
[17]  
2-O
[18]  
Checkland P. B., 1972, Journal of Systems Engineering, V3, P87
[19]  
Checkland P, 2010, SYSTEMS APPROACHES TO MANAGING CHANGE: A PRACTICAL GUIDE, P191, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4_5
[20]   Where does flygskam come from? The role of citizens' lack of knowledge of the environmental impact of air transport in explaining the development of flight shame [J].
Chiambaretto, Paul ;
Mayenc, Elodie ;
Chappert, Herve ;
Engsig, Juliane ;
Fernandez, Anne-Sophie ;
Le Roy, Frederic .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2021, 93