Integrating randomized and observational studies to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes

被引:0
作者
Batorsky, Anna [1 ]
Anstrom, Kevin J. [1 ]
Zeng, Donglin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Biostat, 135 Dauer Dr 3101 McGavran Greenberg Hall,CB 7420, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
augmentation; Back Pain Consortium; data integration; doubly robust; precision medicine; Q-learning; TREATMENT STRATEGIES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1093/biomtc/ujae046
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) are the gold standard for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs), but are costly and require a large sample size. We introduce the multi-stage augmented Q-learning estimator (MAQE) to improve efficiency of estimation of optimal DTRs by augmenting SMART data with observational data. Our motivating example comes from the Back Pain Consortium, where one of the overarching aims is to learn how to tailor treatments for chronic low back pain to individual patient phenotypes, knowledge which is lacking clinically. The Consortium-wide collaborative SMART and observational studies within the Consortium collect data on the same participant phenotypes, treatments, and outcomes at multiple time points, which can easily be integrated. Previously published single-stage augmentation methods for integration of trial and observational study (OS) data were adapted to estimate optimal DTRs from SMARTs using Q-learning. Simulation studies show the MAQE, which integrates phenotype, treatment, and outcome information from multiple studies over multiple time points, more accurately estimates the optimal DTR, and has a higher average value than a comparable Q-learning estimator without augmentation. We demonstrate this improvement is robust to a wide range of trial and OS sample sizes, addition of noise variables, and effect sizes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ambiguous Dynamic Treatment Regimes: A Reinforcement Learning Approach
    Saghafian, Soroush
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2024, 70 (09) : 5667 - 5690
  • [42] A Comparison of Variable Selection Approaches for Dynamic Treatment Regimes
    Biernot, Peter
    Moodie, Erica E. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2010, 6 (01)
  • [43] Identifying a set that contains the best dynamic treatment regimes
    Ertefaie, Ashkan
    Wu, Tianshuang
    Lynch, Kevin G.
    Nahum-Shani, Inbal
    BIOSTATISTICS, 2016, 17 (01) : 135 - 148
  • [44] A matching-based machine learning approach to estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes with time-to-event outcomes
    Wang, Xuechen
    Lee, Hyejung
    Haaland, Benjamin
    Kerrigan, Kathleen
    Puri, Sonam
    Akerley, Wallace
    Shen, Jincheng
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (05) : 794 - 806
  • [45] The use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias
    Pressler, Taylor R.
    Kaizar, Eloise E.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (20) : 3552 - 3568
  • [46] D-learning to estimate optimal individual treatment rules
    Qi, Zhengling
    Liu, Yufeng
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2018, 12 (02): : 3601 - 3638
  • [47] Constructing dynamic treatment regimes over indefinite time horizons
    Ertefaie, Ashkan
    Strawderman, Robert L.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2018, 105 (04) : 963 - 977
  • [48] Bridging observational studies and randomized experiments by embedding the former in the latter
    Bind, Marie-Abele C.
    Rubin, Donald B.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (07) : 1958 - 1978
  • [49] Randomized clinical trials and observational studies in the assessment of drug safety
    Sawchik, J.
    Hamdani, J.
    Vanhaeverbeek, M.
    REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2018, 66 (03): : 217 - 225
  • [50] Observational studies: going beyond the boundaries of randomized controlled trials
    Yang, Wenying
    Zilov, Alexey
    Soewondo, Pradana
    Bech, Ole Molskov
    Sekkal, Fawzia
    Hame, Philip D.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 88 : S3 - S9