What type of cluster randomized trial for which setting?

被引:4
作者
Hemming, Karla [1 ]
Copas, Andrew [2 ]
Forbes, Andrew [3 ]
Kasza, Jessica [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, England
[2] UCL, MRC Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND POPULATION HEALTH | 2024年 / 72卷 / 01期
关键词
HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeph.2024.202195
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The cluster randomized trial allows a randomized evaluation when it is either not possible to randomize the individual or randomizing individuals would put the trial at high risk of contamination across treatment arms. There are many variations of the cluster randomized design, including the parallel design with or without baseline measures, the cluster randomized cross-over design, the stepped-wedge cluster randomized design, and more recently-developed variants such as the batched stepped-wedge design and the staircase design. Once it has been clearly established that there is a need for cluster randomization, one ever important question is which form the cluster design should take. If a design in which time is split into multiple trial periods is to be adopted (e.g. as in a stepped-wedge), researchers must decide whether the same participants should be measured in multiple trial periods (cohort sampling); or if different participants should be measured in each period (continual recruitment or cross-sectional sampling). Here we outline the different possible options and weigh up the pros and cons of the different design choices, which revolve around statistical efficiency, study logistics and the assumptions required. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Community-based health intervention trials: An overview of methodological issues
    Atienza, AA
    King, AC
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2002, 24 (01) : 72 - 79
  • [2] Billot L, 2024, J Epidemiol Pop Health, V72
  • [3] Delaying and withholding interventions: ethics and the stepped wedge trial
    Binik, Ariella
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2019, 45 (10) : 662 - 667
  • [4] Caille A, 2024, J Epidemiol Popul Health, V72
  • [5] Recruitment and implementation challenges were common in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a methodological review
    Caille, Agnes
    Taljaard, Monica
    Abraham, Floriane Le Vilain
    Le Moigne, Alexis
    Copas, Andrew J.
    Tubach, Florence
    Dechartres, Agnes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 148 : 93 - 103
  • [6] The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: what it is and when it should be used
    Campbell, Michael J.
    Hemming, Karla
    Taljaard, Monica
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2019, 210 (06) : 253 - +
  • [7] Cluster randomised trials with different numbers of measurements at baseline and endline: Sample size and optimal allocation
    Copas, Andrew J.
    Hooper, Richard
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 17 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [8] Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches
    Copas, Andrew J.
    Lewis, James J.
    Thompson, Jennifer A.
    Davey, Calum
    Baio, Gianluca
    Hargreaves, James R.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [9] RANDOMIZATION BY GROUP - FORMAL ANALYSIS
    CORNFIELD, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1978, 108 (02) : 100 - 102
  • [10] Systematic review showed that stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials often did not reach their planned sample size
    Eichner, Felizitas A.
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    Grobbee, Diederick E.
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 107 : 89 - 100