Complexity in low-carbon transitions: Uncertainty and policy implications

被引:2
作者
Marsiglio, Simone [1 ]
Tolotti, Marco [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Econ & Management, Via Cosimo Ridolfi 10, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Ca Foscari Venezia, Venice Sch Management, Cannaregio 873, I-30121 Venice, Italy
关键词
Complexity; Energy transition; Green technology adoption; Network; Uncertainty; DISCRETE-CHOICE; ENERGY; MODEL; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107803
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We explore the uncertain dimension induced by the complexity of energy systems, analyzing whether and under which conditions low-carbon transitions can effectively take place. By accounting for social and environmental considerations, heterogeneous single utility-maximizing agents optimally decide whether to adopt a green technology which reduces carbon emissions, allowing eventually for a green energy transition. We characterize the determinants of the success of such a transition, emphasizing that even if the favorable conditions are met the low-carbon transition may not result in long run environmental improvements due to the path-dependency and metastability phenomena which characterize the complexity arising from agents' interactions. Public policy may solve these issues by increasing the incentive for single individuals to adopt, ensuring thus the achievement of a permanent low-carbon state. By extending the analysis to a spatial network characterized by multiplexity due to the social and environmental interconnections, we show that spatial interactions negatively affect agents' adoption incentive and reduce the effectiveness of public policy by interacting in a complex way with path- dependency and metastability. In particular, spatial interactions may require a larger subsidy to support a permanent low-carbon transition, thus neglecting their effects on agents' behavior and environmental outcomes may compromise our chances to achieve a greener future.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Political Competition, Path Dependence, and the Strategy of Sustainable Energy Transitions [J].
Aklin, Michael ;
Urpelainen, Johannes .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 57 (03) :643-658
[2]   Transboundary externalities in the environmental transition hypothesis [J].
Ansuategi, A ;
Perrings, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (04) :353-373
[3]   Complexity and the economy [J].
Arthur, WB .
SCIENCE, 1999, 284 (5411) :107-109
[4]   Energy and complexity: New ways forward [J].
Bale, Catherine S. E. ;
Varga, Liz ;
Foxon, Timothy J. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 138 :150-159
[5]  
Barrat A., 2008, DYNAMICAL PROCESSES
[6]   Dynamical patterns of epidemic outbreaks in complex heterogeneous networks [J].
Barthélemy, M ;
Barrat, A ;
Pastor-Satorras, R ;
Vespignani, A .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) :275-288
[7]   NEW PRODUCT GROWTH FOR MODEL CONSUMER DURABLES [J].
BASS, FM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES A-THEORY, 1969, 15 (05) :215-227
[8]   What Makes Online Content Viral? [J].
Berger, Jonah ;
Milkman, Katherine L. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2012, 49 (02) :192-205
[9]   Assay of renewable energy transition: A systematic literature review [J].
Bhattarai, Utsav ;
Maraseni, Tek ;
Apan, Armando .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 833
[10]   Spatial-SIR with network structure and behavior: Lockdown rules and the Lucas critique [J].
Bisin, Alberto ;
Moro, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2022, 198 :370-388