Are there cross-cultural differences in the transformation of motivation process in close relationships?

被引:1
作者
Chen, Po-Heng [1 ,3 ]
Chittam, Phakkanun [2 ]
Williamson, Hannah C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Human Dev & Family Sci, 108 East Dean Keeton St,SEA 1-142A, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Close relationships; cross-cultural psychology; relationship maintenance; transformation of motivation; COMMUNICATION; SELF; RESPONSES; STYLES;
D O I
10.1177/02654075241255389
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
When faced with an undesirable behavior by one's partner, theories of relationship maintenance indicate that individuals must undergo a transformation of motivation in order to set aside their initial impulse to respond in a self-centered manner, and instead choose to respond in a pro-relationship manner. However, the cultural psychology literature indicates that a primary focus on one's own needs and goals is predominantly a feature of individualistic cultures, such as those in the Unites States and Western Europe which have been the setting for the vast majority of close relationships research. Thus, it is possible that people from less individualistic cultural contexts do not experience this same transformation of motivation process when faced with an undesirable behavior by their partner, because their initial impulse is less self-centered and more other- or relationship-centered. To test this hypothesis we conducted pre-registered replications of two classic studies documenting the transformation of motivation process (Yovetich & Rusbult, 1994) using a cross-cultural sample of participants from the U.S. and Thailand. The extent to which people in both cultural settings engaged in the transformation of motivation process was assessed in a correlational study (N = 187) and an experimental study (N = 328) of partnered individuals. Results indicate that participants in both cultural contexts experience a transformation of motivation process, and the magnitude of the transformation did not differ between the two countries. Exploratory analyses indicate that Thai participants engaged in more passive behaviors than U.S. participants, and U.S. participants thought passive behaviors were more harmful than active behaviors. Overall, when faced with an unpleasant behavior by one's partner, the need to set aside one's initial impulse in order to respond in a more pro-relationship manner appears universal, but the exact behaviors that are the endpoint of that process differ across cultures.
引用
收藏
页码:3172 / 3193
页数:22
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Agnew C R., 2015, The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior, P362, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195399813.013.021
[2]   More than words: Linguistic and nonlinguistic politeness in two cultures [J].
Ambady, N ;
Koo, J ;
Lee, F ;
Rosenthal, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 70 (05) :996-1011
[3]  
Arriaga X.B., 2013, The Oxford Handbook of Close Relationships, P39, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195398694.013.0003
[4]  
Boiger M., 2019, NEW DIR PSYCH, P83, DOI [10.4324/9781351136266-6, DOI 10.4324/9781351136266-6]
[5]   A systematic review of relationship sacrifices from 2002 to 2021: Moving toward inclusivity [J].
Curran, Melissa A. ;
Young, Valerie J. ;
Kayabol, Nazli Busra Akcabozan ;
Totenhagen, Casey J. .
PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2023, 30 (01) :76-112
[6]  
Fincham F.D., 2009, Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: the better angels of our nature, P347, DOI DOI 10.1037/12061-018
[7]   Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the couples satisfaction index [J].
Funk, Janette L. ;
Rogge, Ronald D. .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 21 (04) :572-583
[8]   How You Talk About It Matters: Cultural Variation in Communication Directness in Romantic Relationships [J].
Ge, Fiona ;
Park, Jiyoung ;
Pietromonaco, Paula R. .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 53 (06) :583-602
[9]   Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? [J].
Heine, SJ ;
Lehman, DR ;
Markus, HR ;
Kitayama, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 106 (04) :766-794
[10]  
Hofstede G., 1991, CULTURES ORG