Utilizing gas flux from automated head chamber systems to estimate dietary energy values for beef cattle fed a finishing diet

Dietary net energy for maintenance (NEm) and gain (NEg) can be estimated using calculations based on live performance or adjusted-final body weight, which is calculated based on carcass characteristics. These values are commonly referred to as performance-adjusted (pa) NEm (paNEm) and NEg (paNEg). The NEm and NEg of a diet can also be estimated by adding recovered energy (RE) with heat production (HP) derived from an automated head chamber system (AHCS), which we will term gas-adjusted (ga) NEm (gaNEm) and NEg (gaNEg). Furthermore, HP from the Brouwer equation requires an estimate of urinary nitrogen (UN) excretion, which can be calculated based on N intake, blood urea N, UN concentration, and urine creatinine, or it could be zeroed. Alternatively, HP can be calculated using an alternative equation based on the respiratory quotient. Demonstrating agreement between pa and ga derived dietary energy values provides an opportunity to validate using the AHCS for energetic experiments and this comparison has not been conducted previously. Accordingly, the objective of this experiment was to assess the agreement between live and carcass paNEm and paNEg with gaNEm and gaNEg, where HP was calculated using 4 different approaches. Estimates of HP were not different (P = 0.99) between the 4 approaches employed, indicating that all options investigated are appropriate. Live paNEm and paNEg had a higher agreement (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient [CCC] = 0.91) with gaNEm and gaNEg than carcass values (CCC <= 0.84). These results suggest that researchers can implement the AHCS to provide good estimates of dietary energy values in finishing beef cattle that are unrestrained. Automated head chamber systems provide researchers with the ability to estimate gas flux, heat production, and dietary energy values in finishing beef cattle. Automated head chamber systems (AHCS) implemented into beef cattle research allow estimation of gas flux, heat production (HP), and calculated gas-adjusted dietary net energy for maintenance (gaNEm) and gain (gaNEg) values when paired with recovered energy. However, a comparison between AHCS-derived values and performance-adjusted NEm (paNEm) and NEg (paNEg) from either live performance (live paNEm and paNEg) or carcass data (carcass paNEm and paNEg) has not been conducted. Accordingly, the objectives of this experiment were to evaluate the agreement between gaNEm and gaNEg, estimated using different approaches for calculating HP, with live paNEm and paNEg or carcass paNEm and paNEg. Accounting for urinary nitrogen or methane when calculating HP does not appreciably influence HP estimates or subsequent calculations to estimate dietary NEm and NEg. There was excellent agreement between live paNEm and gaNEm, and between paNEg and gaNEg. Measures of precision, accuracy, and agreement were lower for carcass than for live-derived values when compared to gaNEm and gaNEg but were still acceptable. These results suggest that researchers can implement the AHCS to provide estimates of HP, gas flux, and estimates of dietary energy values in unrestrained finishing beef cattle-fed diets ranging in crude protein content (10.8% to 12.5%). Additional research is warranted on the use of the AHCS to conduct energetic studies across varying diets and production systems, particularly grazing systems.