Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy Versus the Wafer Procedure in the Treatment of Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:1
作者
Jung, Hyoung-Seok [1 ]
Kim, Chul-Ho [2 ]
Kim, Dong-Hyun [2 ]
Choi, Yun-Rak [3 ]
Lee, Jae -Sung [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Gwangmyeong Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 110 Deokan Ro, Gwangmyeong 14353, Gyeonggi, South Korea
[2] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Med, Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Hosp Chung Ang Univ Med, Dept Orthropaed Surg, 224-1 Heukseok Dong, Seoul 156755, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME | 2024年 / 49卷 / 05期
关键词
Meta-analysis; ulnar impaction syndrome; ulnar shortening osteotomy; wafer procedure; FIBROCARTILAGE COMPLEX DEBRIDEMENT; ULNOCARPAL ABUTMENT; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; DORSAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.08.029
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Ulnar impaction syndrome is a common cause of ulnar wrist pain. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are any differences between ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) and the wafer procedure (WP) in terms of clinical outcomes, radiologic outcome, and postoperative complication rate by means of a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for studies published before August 22, 2021, that compared USO and the WP for ulnar impaction syndrome. The pooled analysis was designed to compare the visual analog scale pain score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, modified Mayo score, postoperative ulnar variance, and complication rate between USO and WP. Results: The initial literature search yielded 72 articles. After applying our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 5 studies were eligible for the qualitative and quantitative data syntheses. Surgical indications for performing USO or WP were similar in all patients with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. There were no significant differences in the visual analog scale score (P = .73), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (P = .09), modified Mayo score (Positive outcome, P = .85/Negative outcome, P = .39), postoperative ulnar variance (P = .29), and complications, other than implant irritation (P = .42), between the USO and WP groups. However, overall complication rate was higher in patients treated with USO (P < .05). Conclusions: The WP and USO for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome achieve similar clinical and radiologic outcomes. Although overall complications are significantly more frequent in patients treated with USO, complications not including implant irritation are similar in both groups. (c) 2024 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.) Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.
引用
收藏
页码:493.e1 / 493.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure Versus Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Treatment of Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Afifi, Ahmed
    Ali, Abdelaziz Monsef
    Abdelaziz, Ashraf
    Abuomira, Ibrahim E.
    Saleh, Waleed Riad
    Yehya, Mohamed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2022, 47 (08): : 745 - 751
  • [2] Outcomes of Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy Fixed With a Dynamic Compression System
    Ahsan, Zahab S.
    Song, Yohan
    Yao, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 38A (08): : 1520 - 1523
  • [3] Ulna shortening osteotomy versus arthroscopic wafer procedure in the treatment of ulnocarpal impingement syndrome
    Auzias, P.
    Delarue, R.
    Camus, E. J.
    Van Overstraeten, L.
    [J]. HAND SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2021, 40 (02) : 156 - 161
  • [4] Ulnar shortening osteotomy in idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome
    Baek, GH
    Chung, MS
    Lee, YH
    Gong, HS
    Lee, S
    Kim, HH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (12) : 2649 - 2654
  • [5] A comparison of combined arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex debridement and arthroscopic wafer distal ulna resection versus arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex debridement and ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnocarpal abutment syndrome
    Bernstein, MA
    Nagle, DJ
    Martinez, A
    Stogin, JM
    Wiedrich, TA
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2004, 20 (04) : 392 - 401
  • [6] Meta-Analysis of Odds Ratios Current Good Practices
    Chang, Bei-Hung
    Hoaglin, David C.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2017, 55 (04) : 328 - 335
  • [7] Constantine KJ, 2000, J HAND SURG-AM, V25A, P55
  • [8] Soft Tissue Complications of Dorsal Versus Volar Plating for Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy
    Das De, Soumen
    Johnsen, Parker H.
    Wolfe, Scott W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 40 (05): : 928 - 933
  • [9] Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: Ulnar Shortening vs. Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure
    De Smet, Luc
    Vandenberghe, Lore
    Degreef, Ilse
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WRIST SURGERY, 2014, 3 (02) : 98 - 100
  • [10] FELDON P, 1992, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P124