Carbon Abatement and Socio-environmental Impacts Oriented to Government Policies and Corporate Social Responsibility

被引:1
作者
Wang, Hua [1 ]
Xie, Yanle [2 ]
Wang, Cuicui [3 ]
Huang, Weihua [4 ]
机构
[1] Shihezi Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Xinjiang 832061, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Econ & Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Yantai Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Yantai 264005, Peoples R China
[4] Hubei Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430000, Peoples R China
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Consumer subsidy; Manufacturer subsidy; Social and environmental impact; Social welfare; LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN; SUBSIDY; COORDINATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s13132-024-02117-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Under the constraint of considering corporate social responsibility (CSR), companies have to consider the impact of corporate social responsibility on their production operations and carbon abatement decisions. Therefore, we develop three decision models to explore the impact of different subsidy policies on manufacturers' carbon emission reduction under CSR, and analyze the optimal subsidy policies. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of CSR on social welfare and social environment under different subsidy policies. We find that manufacturers are more willing to reduce carbon emissions, mitigate negative environmental impacts, and improve social welfare under consumer subsidies. However, we find that social welfare and socio-environmental impacts under consumer subsidies are not necessarily better than manufacturer subsidies when the level of CSR is low. Besides, we show that manufacturer subsidies are not always beneficial for improving social welfare and reducing negative socio-environmental impacts. Moreover, we find that manufacturer subsidies may lead to worse environmental impacts and social welfare when the level of CSR is low.
引用
收藏
页码:4284 / 4308
页数:25
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   An Analysis of Price vs. Revenue Protection: Government Subsidies in the Agriculture Industry [J].
Alizamir, Saed ;
Iravani, Foad ;
Mamani, Flamed .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (01) :32-49
[2]  
Amazon, 2023, Building a Better Future Together: 2022 Amazon Sustainability Report
[3]   Green credit financing versus trade credit financing in a supply chain with carbon emission limits [J].
An, Simin ;
Li, Bo ;
Song, Dongping ;
Chen, Xue .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 292 (01) :125-142
[4]   Effects of sustainability investment and risk aversion on a two-stage supply chain coordination under a carbon tax policy [J].
Bai, Qingguo ;
Xu, Jianteng ;
Chauhan, Satyaveer S. .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 142
[5]   Manufacturer vs. Consumer Subsidy with Green Technology Investment and Environmental Concern [J].
Bian, Junsong ;
Zhang, Guoqing ;
Zhou, Guanghui .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 287 (03) :832-843
[6]   Tax or subsidy? An analysis of environmental policies in supply chains with retail competition [J].
Bian, Junsong ;
Zhao, Xuan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 283 (03) :901-914
[7]   A strategic analysis of incorporating CSR into managerial incentive design [J].
Bian, Junsong ;
Li, Kevin W. ;
Guo, Xiaolei .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2016, 86 :83-93
[8]   Supply Chain Carbon Footprinting and Climate Change Disclosures of Global Firms [J].
Blanco, Christian C. .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 30 (09) :3143-3160
[9]   Cost-reducing strategy or emission-reducing strategy? The choice of low-carbon decisions under price threshold subsidy [J].
Cheng, Fei ;
Chen, Tong ;
Chen, Qiao .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2022, 157
[10]   Crop minimum support price versus cost subsidy: Farmer and consumer welfare [J].
Chintapalli, Prashant ;
Tang, Christopher S. .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 31 (04) :1753-1769